Development of size constancy in children: A test of the metacognitive theory

Two studies investigated children’s abilities to estimate the sizes of distant objects. Each included a size estimation task and a size-distance knowledge test, which assessed children’s understanding of the effects of distance on objects’ image sizes and perceived sizes. In Study 1 (N=79, age range=5–10 years), high-knowledge children (those with above-median size-distance knowledge scores) made nearly accurate size estimates from a distance of 61 m and often reported using deliberate strategies to estimate size, whereas low-knowledge children underestimated size at this distance and typically reported no strategy use. In Study 2 (N=60, age range=6–11 years), high-knowledge children made nearly accurate size estimates from 61 m when given objectivesize instructions and underestimated size when given apparent-size instructions. Low-knowledge children underestimated size in response to both instruction sets. The results suggest that age-related changes in size estimation accuracy result from the development of cognitive abilities necessary for using deliberate strategies to supplement perception.

[1]  A. S. Gilinsky,et al.  The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  W. Epstein Attitudes of judgment and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1963 .

[3]  The effect of separation between test and comparison objects on size constancy at various age-levels. , 1970, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  V. R. Carlson Underestimation in Size-Constancy Judgments , 1960 .

[5]  I. Rock,et al.  An introduction to perception , 1975 .

[6]  J. Flavell,et al.  Young children's knowledge about visual perception: projective size and shape. , 1986, Child development.

[7]  V. R. Carlson,et al.  Size-constancy judgments and perceptual compromise. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  C. Granrud,et al.  Development of size constancy in children: A test of the proximal mode sensitivity hypothesis , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  C. Woolger,et al.  Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (wisc-iii) , 2001 .

[10]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[11]  L O Harvey,et al.  Effect of instructions, environment, and type of test object on matched size. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Monocular and binocular size-matching as a function of distance at various age-levels. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Apparent visual size as a function of distance for children and adults. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  J. Wohlwill The Development of “Overconstancy” in Space Perception , 1964 .

[15]  William W. Cohen,et al.  Size judgment at different distances as a function of age level. , 1958, Child development.

[16]  I Rock,et al.  Size Constancy in Children: A New Interpretation , 1988, Perception.

[17]  Carlson Vr,et al.  Size-constancy judgments and perceptual compromise. , 1962 .

[18]  L O Harvey,et al.  Size matching as a function of instructions in a naturalistic environment. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.