The pJan25 vector series: an enhancement of the Gateway-compatible vector pGWB533 for broader promoter testing applications.

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants has enhanced our ability to progress more rapidly in plant genetic engineering. Development of binary vectors for Agrobacterium has played a major role in advancing plant biology. Here, we report new features added to the Gateway-compatible vector pGWB533 for promoter testing with the reporter gene encoding β-glucuronidase (GUS). The original vector contains the spectinomycin/streptomycin adenylyltransferase (aadA) gene for bacterial selection and the hygromycin phosphotransferase gene (hpt) for transformed plant selection. However, some bacterial strains used to transform plants, such as Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain K599, have elevated tolerance to spectinomycin and streptomycin, thus making bacterial selection of pGWB533 inefficient. Although pGWB533 confers chemical selection for transgenic plants using hygromycin resistance, the plasmid has no visual marker that enables visual selection of transformed plants or transgenic tissue. In this regard, adding a gene to constitutively express green fluorescent protein (eGFP) makes it easier to visually select the transformed tissue and trim out the non-transformed. In this report we describe a series of vectors, pJan25S (NCBI: KC416200), pJan25T (NCBI: KC416201) and pJan25X (NCBI: KC416202), that are enhancements of pGWB533 for promoter testing. All three vectors contain the gene encoding eGFP as a visual marker for transformed tissue. However, in pJan25S and pJan25T, eGFP is controlled by the rolD promoter for root-specific expression, while in pJan25X it is controlled by the CaMV35S promoter for constitutive expression in all plant tissues. Spectinomycin and streptomycin resistance remains in pJan25S for bacterial selection; however, pJan25T and pJan25X contain the gene encoding tetracycline resistance (tet) for bacterial selection. These changes resulted in enhanced vectors with better visual and chemical selection that should have broad application in promoter studies.

[1]  B. Matthews,et al.  Post-transcriptional gene silencing of root-knot nematode in transformed soybean roots. , 2011, Experimental parasitology.

[2]  D. Tepfer Transformation of several species of higher plants by agrobacterium rhizogenes: Sexual transmission of the transformed genotype and phenotype , 1984, Cell.

[3]  B. Fuchs,et al.  Ex vitro composite plants: an inexpensive, rapid method for root biology. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[4]  Peter Hajdukiewicz,et al.  The small, versatilepPZP family ofAgrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation , 1994, Plant Molecular Biology.

[5]  K. Maeo,et al.  Improved Gateway Binary Vectors: High-Performance Vectors for Creation of Fusion Constructs in Transgenic Analysis of Plants , 2007, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[6]  M. Bevan,et al.  GUS fusions: beta‐glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[7]  D. Prasher,et al.  Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis plants brightly. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Seong-Kon Lee,et al.  A correlation between host-mediated expression of parasite genes as tandem inverted repeats and abrogation of development of female Heterodera glycines cyst formation during infection of Glycine max , 2009, Planta.

[9]  I. Maiti,et al.  Analysis of cis-sequence of subgenomic transcript promoter from the Figwort mosaic virus and comparison of promoter activity with the cauliflower mosaic virus promoters in monocot and dicot cells. , 2002, Virus research.

[10]  J. Sanford Biolistic plant transformation , 1990 .

[11]  Bingyu Zhao,et al.  A novel Gateway®-compatible binary vector allows direct selection of recombinant clones in Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 2011, Plant Methods.

[12]  S. Ishiguro,et al.  Development of Gateway Binary Vectors, R4L1pGWBs, for Promoter Analysis in Higher Plants , 2009, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[13]  F. White,et al.  Molecular and genetic analysis of the transferred DNA regions of the root-inducing plasmid of Agrobacterium rhizogenes , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  T. Elmayan,et al.  Evaluation in tobacco of the organ specificity and strength of therolD promoter, domain A of the 35S promoter and the 35S2 promoter , 1995, Transgenic Research.

[15]  K. Livak,et al.  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  S. Korban,et al.  Soybean (Glycine max) transformation using immature cotyledon explants. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.