The impact of low-Z and high-Z metal implants in IMRT: a Monte Carlo study of dose inaccuracies in commercial dose algorithms.

PURPOSE The aim of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of low-Z and high-Z metallic implants on IMRT plans. METHODS Computed tomography (CT) scans of three patients were analyzed to study effects due to the presence of Titanium (low-Z), Platinum and Gold (high-Z) inserts. To eliminate artifacts in CT images, a sinogram-based metal artifact reduction algorithm was applied. IMRT dose calculations were performed on both the uncorrected and corrected images using a commercial planning system (convolution/superposition algorithm) and an in-house Monte Carlo platform. Dose differences between uncorrected and corrected datasets were computed and analyzed using gamma index (Pγ<1) and setting 2 mm and 2% as distance to agreement and dose difference criteria, respectively. Beam specific depth dose profiles across the metal were also examined. RESULTS Dose discrepancies between corrected and uncorrected datasets were not significant for low-Z material. High-Z materials caused under-dosage of 20%-25% in the region surrounding the metal and over dosage of 10%-15% downstream of the hardware. Gamma index test yielded Pγ<1>99% for all low-Z cases; while for high-Z cases it returned 91% < Pγ<1< 99%. Analysis of the depth dose curve of a single beam for low-Z cases revealed that, although the dose attenuation is altered inside the metal, it does not differ downstream of the insert. However, for high-Z metal implants the dose is increased up to 10%-12% around the insert. In addition, Monte Carlo method was more sensitive to the presence of metal inserts than superposition/convolution algorithm. CONCLUSIONS The reduction in terms of dose of metal artifacts in CT images is relevant for high-Z implants. In this case, dose distribution should be calculated using Monte Carlo algorithms, given their superior accuracy in dose modeling in and around the metal. In addition, the knowledge of the composition of metal inserts improves the accuracy of the Monte Carlo dose calculation significantly.

[1]  J. Verburg,et al.  CT metal artifact reduction method correcting for beam hardening and missing projections , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Jikun Wei,et al.  Dosimetric impact of a CT metal artefact suppression algorithm for proton, electron and photon therapies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Wolfgang A. Tomé,et al.  On the radiobiological impact of metal artifacts in head-and-neck IMRT in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  Baudouin Maldague,et al.  Multi-detector CT imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient with metal hardware. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Joao Seco,et al.  Conversion of CT numbers into tissue parameters for Monte Carlo dose calculations: a multi-centre study , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A. Wakhloo,et al.  Complex-Shaped Platinum Coils for Brain Aneurysms: Higher Packing Density, Improved Biomechanical Stability, and Midterm Angiographic Outcome , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  Osama Mawlawi,et al.  PET/CT imaging artifacts. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[8]  P. Keall,et al.  Dosimetric considerations for patients with HIP prostheses undergoing pelvic irradiation. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 63. , 2003, Medical physics.

[9]  Joao Seco,et al.  Dosimetric impact of motion in free-breathing and gated lung radiotherapy: a 4D Monte Carlo study of intrafraction and interfraction effects. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  The influence of metal artefacts on the range of ion beams , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J. Hsieh.  Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive x-ray photon noise. , 1998, Medical physics.

[12]  Joao Seco,et al.  Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[13]  Mehran Yazdi,et al.  An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Eriko Tsukamoto,et al.  PET/CT today: System and its impact on cancer diagnosis , 2006, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[15]  Luc Beaulieu,et al.  Correction of CT artifacts and its influence on Monte Carlo dose calculations. , 2007, Medical physics.

[16]  C Coolens,et al.  Calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning of patients with metallic hip prostheses: the use of the extended CT-scale. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Pei-Jan Paul Lin,et al.  A review of factors that affect artifact from metallic hardware on multi-row detector computed tomography. , 2010, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[18]  Todd R McNutt,et al.  The impact of dental metal artifacts on head and neck IMRT dose distributions. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  Gregory C Sharp,et al.  Numerical solutions of the γ-index in two and three dimensions , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Reduction of computed tomography metal artifacts due to the Fletcher-Suit applicator in gynecology patients receiving intracavitary brachytherapy. , 2003, Brachytherapy.

[21]  Jikun Wei,et al.  X-ray CT high-density artefact suppression in the presence of bones , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Segmentation-aided adaptive filtering for metal artifact reduction in radio-therapeutic CT images , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.