A pragmatic approach to the classification of menopausal status for community-based research

Objective: The aim of this article was to describe a pragmatic approach to the menopausal status classification of clinical research study participants that allows for women who have gynecological circumstances that mask their natural menstrual pattern. Design: We demonstrate the application of an algorithm for the Health and Wellbeing After Breast Cancer study based on self-reported menstrual cycle pattern, gynecological history, presence or absence of vasomotor symptoms, and systemic hormone use to classify women with newly diagnosed breast cancer as premenopausal, perimenopausal, or postmenopausal for research purposes. Results: Within 12 months of their breast cancer diagnosis, 1,684 participants, mean ± SD age 57.4 ± 11.9 years, completed a comprehensive women's health questionnaire. Menopausal status in 71.8% of the women was classified by reported bilateral oophorectomy, age, greater than 12 months of amenorrhea, or regular menstrual cycles and absence of symptoms. Status in the remainder was classified by progression through the decision tree. Conclusions: The Health and Wellbeing After Breast Cancer study menopausal classification algorithm is a useful tool for research involving female participants that allows for the classification of women who have had a hysterectomy and/or use systemic hormonal contraception or hormone therapy.

[1]  A. Meikle Endocrine Features of Menstrual Cycles in Middle and Late Reproductive Age and the Menopausal Transition Classified According to the Staging of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) Staging System , 2008 .

[2]  K. Sutton-Tyrrell,et al.  Comparison of SWAN and WISE menopausal status classification algorithms. , 2006, Journal of women's health.

[3]  Bin Nan,et al.  Evaluation of four proposed bleeding criteria for the onset of late menopausal transition. , 2006, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[4]  J. Kulkarni,et al.  Effects of aromatase inhibition on sexual function and well-being in postmenopausal women treated with testosterone: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial , 2006, Menopause.

[5]  C. Farquhar,et al.  The association of hysterectomy and menopause: a prospective cohort study , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  P. Ho,et al.  Ovarian Changes After Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions , 2005, The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI.

[7]  K. Matthews,et al.  Physical activity and changes in weight and waist circumference in midlife women: findings from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  M. Soules,et al.  Executive summary: Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) , 2001, Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society.

[9]  F. Parazzini,et al.  Cross-sectional study of determinants of menopausal age and hormone replacement therapy use in Italian women , 2000, Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society.

[10]  N Reichek,et al.  The Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: protocol design, methodology and feasibility report. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  N. Martin,et al.  Predictive factors of age at menopause in a large Australian twin study. , 1998, Human biology.

[12]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Age at natural menopause and sociodemographic status in Finland. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.