Preparation and comparative study of a new porous polyethylene ocular implant using powder printing technology

In this study, polyethylene (PE) was fabricated with porosity greater than 60% and 140—830 µm pore sizes which is suitable for fibrovascularization. The process involved three-dimensional printing of PE particles with water soluble adhesive powders followed by two-stepped heat treatment at 145°C with binder leaching between steps. Spherical ocular implants were fabricated by this process that had pore size, shaping and suturing ability comparable to commercially available porous PE (Medpor®), but had lower density, higher porosity, and antibiotic uptake, as well as, more uniform pore interconnectivity and lower needle exertion force for suturing.

[1]  M. K. Sinha,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of porous hydroxyapatite ocular implant followed by anin vivo study in dogs , 2004 .

[2]  L. Poole-Warren,et al.  Porous orbital implants in enucleation: a systematic review. , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[3]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  A new approach for the Young's modulus-porosity correlation of ceramic materials , 1997 .

[4]  Casey K. Chan,et al.  In Vitro and In Vivo Behaviors of the Three-layered Nanocarbonated Hydroxyapatite/Collagen/PLGA Composite , 2010 .

[5]  K. Phani,et al.  Strength and elastic modulus of a porous brittle solid: An acousto-ultrasonic study , 1986 .

[6]  M. Aly Effect of pore size on the tensile behavior of open-cell Ti foams: Experimental results , 2010 .

[7]  C. Rimnac,et al.  Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene: mechanics, morphology, and clinical behavior. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[8]  J. Suwanprateeb,et al.  Three-dimensional printing of porous polyethylene structure using water-based binders. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[9]  R. Petersen,et al.  Perspective on orbital enucleation implants. , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[10]  Julia Will,et al.  Porous ceramic bone scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue regeneration , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[11]  J. Suwanprateeb,et al.  Fabrication of Porous Polyethylene by Two-Stepped Heat Treatment and Powder Printing Technique , 2010 .

[12]  Tongkui Cui,et al.  Rapid Prototyping a Double-layer Polyurethane—collagen Conduit and its Schwann Cell Compatibility , 2009 .

[13]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[14]  Sang Woo Park,et al.  Magnetic resonance evaluation of fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene orbital implant. , 2003, Clinical imaging.

[15]  Hassan. A. Abd El-Rehima Hemodialysis Membranes Based on Functionalized High-density Polyethylene , 2005 .

[16]  Peng Lu,et al.  Maximum packing densities of basic 3D objects , 2010 .

[17]  Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip,et al.  3D printing of hydroxyapatite: Effect of binder concentration in pre-coated particle on part strength , 2007 .

[18]  Young Ha Kim,et al.  Histological Behavior of HDPE Scaffolds Fabricated by the “Press-and-Baking” Method , 2005 .

[19]  W. Brostow,et al.  Hydroxyapatite spheres with controlled porosity for eye ball prosthesis: processing and characterization , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[20]  Had,et al.  Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction , 2012 .

[21]  T Aste,et al.  Geometrical structure of disordered sphere packings. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  J. Olver,et al.  Clinicopathologic reports, case reports, and small case series: fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene orbital floor implants in humans. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  P. Rubin,et al.  Orbital reconstruction using porous polyethylene sheets. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[24]  E. D. Rekow,et al.  Performance of hydroxyapatite bone repair scaffolds created via three-dimensional fabrication techniques. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[25]  Q. Lu,et al.  Growth of fibroblast and vascular smooth muscle cells in fibroin/collagen scaffold , 2009 .

[26]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[27]  H. Takita,et al.  Geometry of Carriers Controlling Phenotypic Expression in BMP-Induced Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  D. Stephenson,et al.  The porosity dependence of flexural modulus and strength for capsule-free hot isostatically pressed porous alumina , 2000 .

[29]  T. Xi,et al.  In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Bacterial Cellulose Scaffolds Used for Tissue-engineered Bone , 2009 .

[30]  Jintamai Suwanprateeb,et al.  Improvement in mechanical properties of three‐dimensional printing parts made from natural polymers reinforced by acrylate resin for biomedical applications: a double infiltration approach , 2006 .

[31]  K. Leong,et al.  Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[32]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffold development using 3D printing with a starch-based polymer , 2002 .

[33]  E. D. Rekow,et al.  Engineered cellular response to scaffold architecture in a rabbit trephine defect. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[34]  M. Dujovny,et al.  Biomechanical properties of high-density polyethylene for pterional prosthesis , 2002, Neurological research.

[35]  Eun-Ah Kim,et al.  Fibrovascularization of intraorbital hydroxyapatite-coated alumina sphere in rabbits. , 2005, Korean Journal of Ophthalmology.

[36]  A. Edidin,et al.  Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[37]  W. Suwanpreuk,et al.  Fabrication of bioactive hydroxyapatite/bis-GMA based composite via three dimensional printing , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[38]  Namju Kim,et al.  Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene anophthalmic socket implants. , 2005, Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO.

[39]  Xin Chen,et al.  Silk fibroin modified porous poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold for human fibroblast culture in vitro , 2004 .

[40]  E. D. Rekow,et al.  Performance of degradable composite bone repair products made via three-dimensional fabrication techniques. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[41]  R. W. Curran,et al.  Fibrovascular ingrowth in porous ocular implants: the effect of material composition, porosity, growth factors, and coatings. , 1999, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[42]  J. Bilyk,et al.  Comparison of Fibrovascular Ingrowth into Hydroxyapatite and Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants , 1994, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[43]  J. Suwanprateeb,et al.  Mechanical and in vitro performance of apatite–wollastonite glass ceramic reinforced hydroxyapatite composite fabricated by 3D-printing , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.