An analysis and design methodology for belief sharing in large groups

Many applications require that a group of agents share a coherent distributed picture of the world given communication constraints. This paper describes an analysis and design methodology for coordination algorithms for extremely large groups of agents maintaining a distributed belief. This design methodology creates a probability distribution which relates global properties of the system to agent interaction dynamics using the tools of statistical mechanics. Using this probability distribution we show that this system undergoes a rapid phase transition between low divergence and high divergence in the distributed belief at a critical value of system temperature. We also show empirically that at the critical system temperature the number of messages passed and belief divergence between agents is optimal. Finally, we use this fact to develop an algorithm using system temperature as a local decision parameter for an agent.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  C. A. García Canal,et al.  Ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism in the Potts model in (1 + 1) and (2 + 1) dimensions , 1982 .

[3]  Luiz Chaimowicz,et al.  Aerial Shepherds: Coordination among UAVs and Swarms of Robots , 2004, DARS.

[4]  Hugh Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Communication In General Decentralised Filters And The Coordinated Search Strategy , 2004 .

[5]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  The Phase Transition in Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problems: Fist Results , 2000, CP.

[6]  R. B. Potts Some generalized order-disorder transformations , 1952, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[7]  Régis Vincent,et al.  Task inference and distributed task management in the Centibots robotic system , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[8]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[9]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Agent Architectures for Flexible, Practical Teamwork , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[10]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Comparing Situation Awareness for Two Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Human Interface Approaches , 2006 .

[11]  Sai-Ping Li,et al.  Taming the Gerrymander—Statistical physics approach to Political Districting Problem , 2005, physics/0511237.

[12]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Decentralized Sensor Fusion with Distributed Particle Filters , 2002, UAI.

[13]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Coordinated control for networked multi-agent systems , 2007 .

[14]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[15]  E. Koonin,et al.  Scale-free networks in biology: new insights into the fundamentals of evolution? , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[16]  Ben Grocholsky,et al.  Information-Theoretic Control of Multiple Sensor Platforms , 2002 .

[17]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Decentralized Bayesian negotiation for cooperative search , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[18]  Yang Xu,et al.  An integrated token-based algorithm for scalable coordination , 2005, AAMAS '05.