Sampling theory and automated simulations for vertical sections, applied to human brain

In recent years, there have been substantial developments in both magnetic resonance imaging techniques and automatic image analysis software. The purpose of this paper is to develop stereological image sampling theory (i.e. unbiased sampling rules) that can be used by image analysts for estimating geometric quantities such as surface area and volume, and to illustrate its implementation. The methods will ideally be applied automatically on segmented, properly sampled 2D images – although convenient manual application is always an option – and they are of wide applicability in many disciplines. In particular, the vertical sections design to estimate surface area is described in detail and applied to estimate the area of the pial surface and of the boundary between cortex and underlying white matter (i.e. subcortical surface area). For completeness, cortical volume and mean cortical thickness are also estimated. The aforementioned surfaces were triangulated in 3D with the aid of FreeSurfer software, which provided accurate surface area measures that served as gold standards. Furthermore, a software was developed to produce digitized trace curves of the triangulated target surfaces automatically from virtual sections. From such traces, a new method (called the ‘lambda method’) is presented to estimate surface area automatically. In addition, with the new software, intersections could be counted automatically between the relevant surface traces and a cycloid test grid for the classical design. This capability, together with the aforementioned gold standard, enabled us to thoroughly check the performance and the variability of the different estimators by Monte Carlo simulations for studying the human brain. In particular, new methods are offered to split the total error variance into the orientations, sectioning and cycloid components. The latter prediction was hitherto unavailable – one is proposed here and checked by way of simulations on a given set of digitized vertical sections with automatically superimposed cycloid grids of three different sizes. Concrete and detailed recommendations are given to implement the methods.

[1]  Bente Pakkenberg,et al.  Comparison of MR imaging against physical sectioning to estimate the volume of human cerebral compartments , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  Stereology for Statisticians , 2004 .

[3]  T M Mayhew,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and model-free estimates of brain volume determined using the Cavalieri principle. , 1991, Journal of anatomy.

[4]  Jacques Istas,et al.  Precision of systematic sampling and transitive methods , 1999 .

[5]  G. Matheron Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation : une application de la théorie de fonctions aléatoires aux sciences de la nature , 1965 .

[6]  N Roberts,et al.  Estimation of brain compartment volume from MR Cavalieri slices. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  E B V Jensen,et al.  On semiautomatic estimation of surface area , 2013, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  L. Santaló Integral geometry and geometric probability , 1976 .

[9]  Luis M. Cruz-Orive Variance predictors for isotropic geometric sampling, with applications in forestry , 2013, Stat. Methods Appl..

[10]  Luis M. Cruz-Orive,et al.  La estereología como herramienta de cuantificación del volumen y la atrofia cortical en el cerebro del anciano con demencia , 2008 .

[11]  Ricardo Insausti,et al.  A case study from neuroscience involving stereology and multivariate analysis , 2004 .

[12]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Estimation of surface area from vertical sections , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  E. H. Lockwood,et al.  A Book of Curves , 1963, The Mathematical Gazette.

[14]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Stereology of isolated objects with the invariator , 2010, Journal of microscopy.

[15]  Kiên Kiêu,et al.  Precision of stereological planar area predictors , 2006, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Precision of circular systematic sampling , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  Cruz Orive,et al.  Stereology: meeting point of integral geometry, probability, and statistics. In memory of Professor Luis A. Santaló (1911-2001) , 2002 .

[18]  Konrad Sandau,et al.  Unbiased Stereology. Three‐Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy. , 1999 .

[19]  R. Ambartzumian Stochastic and integral geometry , 1987 .

[20]  J. Thornton,et al.  Quantitative MRI: a reliable protocol for measurement of cerebral gyrification using stereology. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  Bente Pakkenberg,et al.  Application of stereological methods to estimate post-mortem brain surface area using 3T MRI. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  H J Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction * , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[23]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  A general variance predictor for Cavalieri slices , 2006, Journal of microscopy.

[24]  H. Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology — reconsidered , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[25]  M J Puddephat,et al.  The benefit of stereology for quantitative radiology. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[26]  Marta García-Fiñana,et al.  Improved variance prediction for systematic sampling on ℝ , 2004 .

[27]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Application of the Cavalieri principle and vertical sections method to lung: estimation of volume and pleural surface area , 1988, Journal of microscopy.

[28]  J R Nyengaard,et al.  The semi‐automatic nucleator , 2011, Journal of microscopy.

[29]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Precision of Cavalieri sections and slices with local errors , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[30]  T. Mattfeldt Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .