Nonprofit Performance

Performance is a key concern for nonprofits providing human services. Yet our understanding of what drives performance remains incomplete. Existing outcome measurement systems track the programmatic activities staff complete and the extent to which participants respond in programmatically intended ways. However, clients do not just receive services and respond as intended and staff do not simply complete program activities. Drawing on a data set of 47 interviews with frontline staff in eight human service nonprofits, we show how frontline staff work in a partnership with clients to set an agenda for change and achieve desired results. We call this co-determination work and argue that it represents a critical and often neglected dimension of nonprofit performance.

[1]  Johan Vamstad,et al.  Co-production and Service Quality: The Case of Cooperative Childcare in Sweden , 2012 .

[2]  Huey-tsyh Chen Theory-driven evaluations , 1990 .

[3]  P. Corrigan Impact of consumer-operated services on empowerment and recovery of people with psychiatric disabilities. , 2006, Psychiatric services.

[4]  Bram Verschuere,et al.  Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda , 2012, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.

[5]  D. A. Campbell Is Constituent Feedback Living up to Its Promise? Provider Perceptions of Feedback Practices in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations , 2010 .

[6]  Alan Keith-Lucas Giving and taking help , 1972 .

[7]  Michael J. Austin,et al.  Performance Measurement Challenges in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations , 2014 .

[8]  Gordon P. Whitaker Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery , 1980 .

[9]  J. C. Thomas Citizen, Customer, Partner: Rethinking the Place of the Public in Public Management , 2013 .

[10]  Kimberly A. Fredericks,et al.  Nonprofits and evaluation: Empirical evidence from the field , 2008 .

[11]  J. Alford,et al.  Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-Production , 2009 .

[12]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector , 2009 .

[13]  Kris Smock Democracy in Action: Community Organizing and Urban Change , 2004 .

[14]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Does Local Community Control of Police make a Difference? Some Preliminary Findings , 1973 .

[15]  Steven Rathgeb Smith,et al.  Nonprofits and Public Administration Reconciling Performance Management and Citizen Engagement , 2010 .

[16]  M. Lipsky,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service , 1983 .

[17]  Lehn M. Benjamin The Potential of Outcome Measurement for Strengthening Nonprofits’ Accountability to Beneficiaries , 2013 .

[18]  Alnoor Ebrahim,et al.  NGOs and Organizational Change: Discourse, Reporting, and Learning , 2003 .

[19]  W. Shadish,et al.  Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice , 1990 .

[20]  L. Schorr,et al.  EXPANDING THE EVIDENCE UNIVERSE : Doing Better By Knowing More , 2014 .

[21]  L. Lein,et al.  The private safety net: The role of charitable organizations in the lives of the poor , 1998 .

[22]  E. Brodkin,et al.  Accountability in Street-Level Organizations , 2008 .

[23]  Steven Maynard-Moody,et al.  Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service , 2003 .

[24]  Ernest Allen,et al.  Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America , 1986 .

[25]  Lehn M. Benjamin Bearing More Risk for Results , 2008 .

[26]  Y. Hasenfeld Human Services as Complex Organizations , 2009 .

[27]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[28]  Tony Bovaird,et al.  From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value , 2012 .

[29]  J. Brudney,et al.  Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept , 1983 .

[30]  Simon Calmar Andersen,et al.  Coproduction and Equity in Public Service Delivery , 2013 .

[31]  Paul Hager,et al.  Know‐How and Workplace Practical Judgement , 2000 .