Action potential duration restitution kinetics in human atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES We undertook this study to determine whether human atrial fibrillation (AF) relates to steeply sloped action potential duration restitution (APDR) kinetics and whether the spatial nonuniformity of APDR promotes persistence of AF. BACKGROUND A steeply sloped APDR curve is known to be an important determinant of the induction of more complex action potential duration (APD) dynamics and fibrillation. METHODS Patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) (n = 18), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (n = 14) and normal control subjects (n = 9) were studied. The monophasic action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD(90)) and the effective refractory period (ERP) were measured at six sites in the right atrium. After AF was electrically converted, APDR was assessed by delivering a single extrastimulus after a train of stimuli at a cycle length of 600 ms (S(1)S(2)) at six different sites of the right atrium, as well as rapid pacing at cycle lengths that induced APD alternans. RESULTS The APD(90) and ERP in patients with CAF were shorter than those in patients with PAF and control subjects (p < 0.05); however, the dispersions of APD(90) and ERP in each group were similar. The maximal slopes of APDR by S(1)S(2) and rapid pacing in patients with CAF (1.2 +/- 0.4 and 1.7 +/- 0.2) and PAF (1.1 +/- 0.4 and 1.3 +/- 0.4) were higher than those in control subjects (0.5 +/- 0.3 and 0.8 +/- 0.2, respectively; p < 0.01). The maximal slope obtained by S(1)S(2) did not differ from that obtained by rapid pacing in any group. The inter-regional difference of the maximal slope in patients with CAF (1.6 +/- 0.4, p < 0.05) was greater than that in patients with PAF (1.2 +/- 0.3, p = NS vs. control) and control subjects (0.4 +/- 0.2). CONCLUSIONS Atrial fibrillation was related to steeply sloped (>1) APDR kinetics. The spatial dispersion of APDR in patients with chronic AF was greater than that of patients with paroxysmal AF and control subjects, indicating that the heterogeneity of APDR of the atrium plays an important role in the persistence of AF.

[1]  M. Simson,et al.  Oscillations of conduction, action potential duration, and refractoriness. A mechanism for spontaneous termination of reentrant tachycardias. , 1988, Circulation.

[2]  Marc Courtemanche,et al.  Complex spiral wave dynamics in a spatially distributed ionic model of cardiac electrical activity. , 1996, Chaos.

[3]  A. Michelucci,et al.  Wavelength Index at Three Atrial Sites in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  M. Franz,et al.  Cycle length dependence of human action potential duration in vivo. Effects of single extrastimuli, sudden sustained rate acceleration and deceleration, and different steady-state frequencies. , 1988, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  H. Karagueuzian,et al.  Mechanism of procainamide-induced prevention of spontaneous wave break during ventricular fibrillation. Insight into the maintenance of fibrillation wave fronts. , 1999, Circulation.

[6]  C. Lau,et al.  Heterogeneous Changes in Electrophysiologic Properties in the Paroxysmal and Chronically Fibrillating Human Atrium , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  S. Olsson,et al.  Monophasic action potential and sinus rhythm stability after conversion of atrial fibrillation. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[8]  G. Salama,et al.  Enhanced dispersion of repolarization and refractoriness in transgenic mouse hearts promotes reentrant ventricular tachycardia. , 2000, Circulation research.

[9]  M R Franz,et al.  Electrical remodeling of the human atrium: similar effects in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Allessie,et al.  Circus Movement in Rabbit Atrial Muscle as a Mechanism of Tachycardia: II. The Role of Nonuniform Recovery of Excitability in the Occurrence of Unidirectional Block, as Studied with Multiple Microelectrodes , 1976, Circulation research.

[11]  P. Coumel,et al.  Failure in the rate adaptation of the atrial refractory period: its relationship to vulnerability. , 1982, International journal of cardiology.

[12]  A. Garfinkel,et al.  Preventing ventricular fibrillation by flattening cardiac restitution. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  A. Garfinkel,et al.  Chaos and the transition to ventricular fibrillation: a new approach to antiarrhythmic drug evaluation. , 1999, Circulation.

[14]  M. Allessie,et al.  Circus Movement in Rabbit Atrial Muscle as a Mechanism of Tachycardia , 1973, Circulation research.

[15]  熊谷 浩一郎.  Electrophysiological properties in chronic lone atrial fibrillation , 1992 .

[16]  S Nattel,et al.  Ionic remodeling underlying action potential changes in a canine model of atrial fibrillation. , 1997, Circulation research.

[17]  A Garfinkel,et al.  Spatiotemporal complexity of ventricular fibrillation revealed by tissue mass reduction in isolated swine right ventricle. Further evidence for the quasiperiodic route to chaos hypothesis. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  F. Cosío,et al.  Electrophysiologic studies in atrial fibrillation , 1983 .

[19]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Chronic rapid atrial pacing. Structural, functional, and electrophysiological characteristics of a new model of sustained atrial fibrillation. , 1995, Circulation.

[20]  J M de Bakker,et al.  Increased dispersion of "refractoriness" in patients with idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  A. Karma.  Electrical alternans and spiral wave breakup in cardiac tissue. , 1994, Chaos.

[22]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Modulated dispersion explains changes in arrhythmia vulnerability during premature stimulation of the heart. , 1998, Circulation.

[23]  M. Allessie,et al.  Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. , 1995, Circulation.

[24]  C. Pandozi,et al.  Electrophysiological characteristics of the human atria after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. , 1998, Circulation.

[25]  M. Rosen,et al.  Steady-state and nonsteady-state action potentials in fibrillating canine atrium: abnormal rate adaptation and its possible mechanisms. , 1999, Cardiovascular research.

[26]  G. Moe,et al.  Nonuniform Recovery of Excitability in Ventricular Muscle , 1964, Circulation research.

[27]  S. Nattel,et al.  Importance of refractoriness heterogeneity in the enhanced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation induction caused by tachycardia-induced atrial electrical remodeling. , 1998, Circulation.

[28]  R. Gilmour,et al.  Dynamic restitution of action potential duration during electrical alternans and ventricular fibrillation. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[29]  M. Josephson,et al.  Atrial conduction: effects of extrastimuli with and without atrial dysrhythmias. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  A Garfinkel,et al.  Cardiac electrical restitution properties and stability of reentrant spiral waves: a simulation study. , 1999, The American journal of physiology.