A comparison of national open data policies: lessons learned

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive cross-national comparative framework to compare open data policies from different countries and to derive lessons for developing open data policies. Open data policies guide the opening and stimulate the usage of public data. However, some countries have no or less developed open data policies, in this way missing the opportunity to reap the benefits of open data. Design/methodology/approach – Literature review and case studies were conducted to extend an existing comparison framework, and the framework was used to compare open data policies of the UK, the USA, The Netherlands, Kenya and Indonesia. Findings – The comparison of open data policies highlighted several lessons that can be learned, including actions regarding a robust legal framework, generic operational policies, data providers and data users, data quality, designated agencies or taskforces and initiatives and incentives for stimulating demand for data. National policies should...

[1]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies' open data publication: A study in Taiwan , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda , 2016, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[3]  Elizabeth Julia Andini Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Dalam Pengelolaan APBN di Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik , 2015 .

[4]  Peter Parycek,et al.  Special Issue on Transparency and Open Data Policies: Guest Editors' Introduction , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[5]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  Legal and Institutional Challenges for Opening Data across Public Sectors: Towards Common Policy Solutions , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[6]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Analysing challenges, barriers and CSF of egov adoption , 2013 .

[8]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  B. Lundqvist “Turning Government Data Into Gold”: The Interface Between EU Competition Law and the Public Sector Information Directive—With Some Comments on the Compass Case , 2013 .

[10]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Issues and Guiding Principles for Opening Governmental Judicial Research Data , 2012, International Conference on Electronic Government.

[11]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[12]  N. Huijboom,et al.  Open data: An International comparison of strategies , 2011 .

[13]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  C. Hampden-Turner,et al.  Riding the waves of culture , 2009 .

[15]  Lauri Frank,et al.  Does strategy matter? A comparison of broadband rollout policies in Finland and Sweden , 2008 .

[16]  W. Huang,et al.  E-Government Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries: An Implementation Framework and Case Study , 2006, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[18]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Current practices of leading e-government countries , 2005, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[20]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Environment and Policy Factors Shaping Global E-Commerce Diffusion: A Cross-Country Comparison , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[21]  C. Demchak,et al.  Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web , 2002 .

[22]  Joseph Stewart,et al.  Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach , 1996 .

[23]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .