The ‘no loser’ principle in Hong Kong’s education reform: Does it apply to ethnic minority students?

An important feature of Hong Kong’s education reform over the past decade has been the articulation of the ‘no loser principle.’ It was meant to signal that all students are valuable and will benefit from both basic and senior secondary education. Yet barriers remain for the 2.9% of students under age 15 who can be classified as ethnic minorities. There is a declining participating rate as students move from primary to tertiary level, the medium of instruction remains alien to most of these students, and there are no curriculum provisions to meet their special needs. This paper will examine both the policy context in which provisions for ethnic minority students have been made in Hong Kong schools and also classroom practice that operationalises this policy on a daily basis. The purpose is to make an assessment of the extent to which the ‘no loser principle’ can be said to apply to ethnic minority students. 1 The research to be reported here is drawn from the General Research Fund project, Exploring Cultural Diversity in Chinese Classrooms: Can Assessment Environments Cater for the Needs of Ethnic Minority Students in Hong Kong, [GRF-HKIEd840809] funded by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council. The views expressed here are those of the author.

[1]  A. Hargreaves,et al.  Student Diversity and Secondary School Change in a Context of Increasingly Standardized Reform , 2008 .

[2]  Gavin T. L. Brown,et al.  Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes , 2008 .

[3]  Egon Schwelb,et al.  The International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination , 1966, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[4]  B. Carrington,et al.  Education, racism, and reform , 1990 .

[5]  Ronald R. Edmonds Effective Schools for the Urban Poor , 1979 .

[6]  Jennifer Yang Hui,et al.  REPORT ON A CONFERENCE ORGANIZED BY THE CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY (CENS) AT THE S. RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (RSIS), , 2009 .

[7]  H. Satoh REPORT OF A CONFERENCE ORGANIZED BY THE CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY (CENS) AT THE S. RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (RSIS) , 2008 .

[8]  Gavin T. L. Brown,et al.  Students' Conceptions of Assessment and Mathematics: Self-Regulation Raises Achievement. , 2007 .

[9]  W. Kymlicka,et al.  Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity , 2009 .

[10]  Will Kymlicka,et al.  Multiculturalism in Asia , 2005 .

[11]  A. Kassenaar,et al.  Opening address , 2005, Pharmaceutisch Weekblad.

[12]  Gloria J. Ladson-Billings,et al.  The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Multicultural Education , 2004 .

[13]  W. Kymlicka Multicultural Citizenship , 2020, The New Social Theory Reader.

[14]  D. McInerney Cross‐cultural insights into school motivation and decision making , 1992 .