Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables

This paper examines the question of which sources of uncertainty most strongly affect the repair cost of a building in a future earthquake. Uncertainties examined here include spectral acceleration, ground-motion details, mass, damping, structural force-deformation behavior, building-component fragility, contractor costs, and the contractor's overhead and profit. We measure the variation (or swing) of the repair cost when each basic input variable except one is taken at its median value, and the remaining variable is taken at its 10th and at its 90th percentile. We perform this study using a 1960s highrise nonductile reinforced-concrete moment-frame building. Repair costs are estimated using the assembly-based vulnerability (ABV) method. We find that the top three contributors to uncertainty are assembly capacity (the structural response at which a component exceeds some damage state), shaking intensity (measured here in terms of damped elastic spectral acceleration, Sa), and details of the ground motion with a given Sa.

[1]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[2]  Roger E. Scholl.  Seismic damage assessment for high-rise buildings , 1980 .

[3]  J. I. Ziony.  Evaluating earthquake hazards in the Los Angeles region--an earth-science perspective , 1985 .

[4]  George T. Taoka.  Damping Measurements Of Tall Structures , 1980 .

[5]  Mehdi Saiidi Movahhed,et al.  Simple and Complex Models for Nonlinear Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1979 .

[6]  Bruce Ellingwood,et al.  Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58 , 1980 .

[7]  A. D. Frankel,et al.  Seismic hazard curves and uniform hazard response spectra for the United States - A user guide , 2001 .

[8]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Performance Assessment for a Reinforced Concrete Frame Building , 2000, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes.

[9]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  New Tools to Determine Seismic Hazard and Other Seismic Parameters for the United States , 2001 .

[10]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Seismic Damage and Collapse Assessment of Composite Moment Frames , 2001 .

[11]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Assembly-Based Vulnerability of Buildings and Its Use in Performance Evaluation , 2001 .

[12]  Graeme Haynes McVerry,et al.  Frequency domain identification of structural models from earthquake records , 1979 .

[13]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Decision Support Tools for Earthquake Recovery of Businesses , 1999 .

[14]  Johannes Beck,et al.  Improving Loss Estimation for Woodframe Buildings , 2001 .

[15]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure , 2001 .

[16]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Direct Economic Losses in the Northridge Earthquake: A Three-Year Post-Event Perspective , 1998 .

[17]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[18]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity , 1997 .

[19]  James O Jirsa,et al.  Nonlinear Analyses of an Instrumented Structure Damaged in the 1994 Northridge Earthquake , 1998 .

[20]  Means.  Means assemblies cost data , 1985 .

[21]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Engineering features of the San Fernando earthquake of February 9, 1971 , 1971 .

[22]  Shigeru Kuranishi,et al.  VIBRATIONAL BEHAVIOR OF FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES WITH DYNAMIC VIBRATION ABSORBERS , 1981 .

[23]  Jose´A. Pincheira,et al.  Seismic Analysis of Older Reinforced Concrete Columns , 1999 .