Spatial Modeling of Biological Soil Crusts to Support Rangeland Assessment and Monitoring

Abstract Biological soil crusts are a diverse soil surface community, prevalent in semiarid regions, which function as ecosystem engineers and perform numerous important ecosystem services. Loss of crusts has been implicated as a factor leading to accelerated soil erosion and other forms of land degradation. To support assessment and monitoring efforts aimed at ensuring the sustainability of rangeland ecosystems, managers require spatially explicit information concerning potential cover and composition of biological soil crusts. We sampled low disturbance sites in Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (Utah, USA) to determine the feasibility of modeling the potential cover and composition of biological soil crusts in a large area. We used classification and regression trees to model cover of four crust types (light cyanobacterial, dark cyanobacterial, moss, lichen) and 1 cyanobacterial biomass proxy (chlorophyll a), based upon a parsimonious set of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) data layers (soil types, precipitation, and elevation). Soil type was consistently the best predictor, although elevation and precipitation were both invoked in the various models. Predicted and observed values for the dark cyanobacterial, moss, and lichen models corresponded moderately well (R2 = 0.49, 0.64, 0.55, respectively). Cover of late successional crust elements (moss + lichen + dark cyanobacterial) was also successfully modeled (R2 = 0.64). We were less successful with models of light cyanobacterial cover (R2 = 0.22) and chlorophyll a (R2 = 0.09). We believe that our difficulty modeling chlorophyll a concentration is related to a severe drought and subsequent cyanobacterial mortality during the course of the study. These models provide the necessary reference conditions to facilitate the comparison between the actual cover and composition of biological soil crusts at a given site and their potential cover and composition condition so that sites in poor condition can be identified and management actions can be taken.

[1]  S. Warren.  Biological Soil Crusts and Hydrology in North American Deserts , 2001 .

[2]  U. Karsten,et al.  Carotenoids and mycosporine-like amino acid compounds in members of the genus Microcoleus (Cyanobact , 1996 .

[3]  E. J. Dyksterhuis.  Condition and Management of Range Land Based on Quantitative Ecology. , 1949 .

[4]  B. McCune,et al.  Biotic Soil Crusts of Oregon's Shrub Steppe: Community Composition in Relation to Soil Chemistry, Climate, and Livestock Activity , 2000 .

[5]  J. Klopatek.  Cryptogamic Crusts as Potential Indicators of Disturbance in Semi-Arid Landscapes , 1992 .

[6]  W. Lauenroth,et al.  Secondary Succession and the Evaluation of Rangeland Condition , 1989 .

[7]  Jason C. Neff,et al.  MULTI-DECADAL IMPACTS OF GRAZING ON SOIL PHYSICAL AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES IN SOUTHEAST UTAH , 2005 .

[8]  K. Harper,et al.  A role for nonvascular plants in management of arid and semiarid rangelands , 1988 .

[9]  D. Eldridge,et al.  Monitoring Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function: Grasslands, Deserts, and Steppe , 2002 .

[10]  Patrick L. Shaver,et al.  Rangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment. , 2002 .

[11]  Jayne Belnap,et al.  Disturbance and Recovery of Biological Soil Crusts , 2001 .

[12]  R. Türk,et al.  Biological Soil Crusts of the Subalpine, Alpine, and Nival Areas in the Alps , 2001 .

[13]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Terrestrial ecoregions of North America : a conservation assessment , 1999 .

[14]  Jayne Belnap,et al.  Surface disturbances: Their role in accelerating desertification , 1995, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[15]  D. Eldridge.  Distribution and Floristics of Terricolous Lichens in Soil Crusts in Arid and Semi-Arid New South Wales, Australia , 1996 .

[16]  A. Page.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. , 1982 .

[17]  G. Kidron,et al.  The role of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides in structuring desert microbial crusts , 1996 .

[18]  J. Klopatek,et al.  Effects of grazing on the vegetation of the blackbrush association. , 1987 .

[19]  J. Belnap.  Soil surface disturbances in cold deserts: effects on nitrogenase activity in cyanobacterial-lichen soil crusts , 1996, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[20]  Christian Floret,et al.  Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Ecosystems in Arid and Semi‐Arid Lands. I. A View from the South , 1993 .

[21]  R. J. Beymer,et al.  Potential contribution of carbon by microphytic crusts in pinyon‐juniper woodlands , 1991 .

[22]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  A break in the nitrogen cycle in aridlands? Evidence from δp15N of soils , 1993, Oecologia.

[23]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  The Biogeochemistry of Phosphorus Cycling and Phosphorus Availability Along a Desert Soil Chronosequence , 1988 .

[24]  Patrick L. Shaver,et al.  Interpreting indicators of rangeland health , 2005 .

[25]  Jayne Belnap,et al.  Recovery rates of cryptobiotic crusts: inoculant use and assessment methods , 1993 .

[26]  F. Maestre,et al.  Insights into Ecosystem Composition and Function in a Sequence of Degraded Semiarid Steppes , 2004 .

[27]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[28]  J. Belnap,et al.  Biological Soil Crusts of North America , 2001 .

[29]  R. A. Evans,et al.  The Step-Point Method of Sampling-A Practical Tool in Range Research. , 1957 .

[30]  A. Danin,et al.  Trapping of airborne dust by mosses in the Negev Desert, Israel , 1991 .

[31]  J. Belnap,et al.  Aeolian dust in Colorado Plateau soils: Nutrient inputs and recent change in source , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  C. Stokes,et al.  Stress, disturbance and change in rangeland ecosystems , 2000 .

[33]  D. Tongway,et al.  Soil surface features as indicators of rangeland site productivity. , 1989 .

[34]  J. Belnap,et al.  Correlates of biological soil crust abundance across a continuum of spatial scales: support for a hierarchical conceptual model , 2006 .

[35]  J. Belnap,et al.  Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management , 2003, Ecological Studies.

[36]  Frederic E. Clements,et al.  Nature and Structure of the Climax , 1936 .

[37]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Water and nitrogen dynamics in an arid woodland , 1994, Oecologia.

[38]  K. Price,et al.  Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  F. Nachtergaele.  Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[40]  J. Lawton,et al.  POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF ORGANISMS AS PHYSICAL ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERS , 1997 .

[41]  J. Belnap,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR MICRONUTRIENT LIMITATION OF BIOLOGICAL SOIL CRUSTS: IMPORTANCE TO ARID-LANDS RESTORATION , 2005 .

[42]  T. H. Nash,et al.  Lichen and Moss Distribution and Biomass in Hot Desert Ecosystems , 1977 .

[43]  J. Belnap,et al.  Influence of Biological Soil Crusts on Soil Environments and Vascular Plants , 2001 .

[44]  S. Reed,et al.  Temporal Variation in Community Composition, Pigmentation, and Fv/Fm of Desert Cyanobacterial Soil Crusts , 2002, Microbial Ecology.

[45]  D. Tongway,et al.  Assessing rangeland capability in Iran using landscape function indices based on soil surface attributes , 2006 .

[46]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .