WITHIN‐HOST POPULATION DYNAMICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF MICROPARASITES IN A HETEROGENEOUS HOST POPULATION

Abstract Why do parasites harm their hosts? The general understanding is that if the transmission rate and virulence of a parasite are linked, then the parasite must harm its host to maximize its transmission. The exact nature of such trade‐offs remains largely unclear, but for vertebrate hosts it probably involves interactions between a microparasite and the host immune system. Previous results have suggested that in a homogeneous host population in the absence of super‐ or coinfection, within‐host dynamics lead to selection of the parasite with an intermediate growth rate that is just being controlled by the immune system before it kills the host (Antia et al. 1994). In this paper, we examine how this result changes when heterogeneity is introduced to the host population. We incorporate the simplest form of heterogeneity–random heterogeneity in the parameters describing the size of the initial parasite inoculum, the immune response of the host, and the lethal density at which the parasite kills the host. We find that the general conclusion of the previous model holds: parasites evolve some intermediate growth rate. However, in contrast with the generally accepted view, we find that virulence (measured by the case mortality or the rate of parasite‐induced host mortality) increases with heterogeneity. Finally, we link the within‐host and between‐host dynamics of parasites. We show how the parameters for epidemiological spread of the disease can be estimated from the within‐host dynamics, and in doing so examine the way in which trade‐offs between these epidemiological parameters arise as a consequence of the interaction of the parasite and the immune response of the host.

[1]  Steven A. Frank,et al.  Models of Parasite Virulence , 1996, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[2]  N. Ling The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its applications , 1978 .

[3]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  Mathematical models of parasite responses to host immune defences , 1997, Parasitology.

[4]  P. Thrall,et al.  The cost of resistance and the maintenance of genetic polymorphism in host—pathogen systems , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  M. Woolhouse,et al.  Parasite―host coevolution and geographic patterns of parasite infectivity and host susceptibility , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. Schulman Effects of immunity on transmission of influenza: experimental studies. , 1970, Progress in medical virology. Fortschritte der medizinischen Virusforschung. Progres en virologie medicale.

[7]  H J Bremermann,et al.  A competitive exclusion principle for pathogen virulence , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[8]  W. Welch,et al.  How cells respond to stress. , 1993, Scientific American.

[9]  D. Ebert,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF HOST DEMOGRAPHY ON THE EVOLUTION OF VIRULENCE OF A MICROSPORIDIAN GUT PARASITE , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Sex against virulence: the coevolution of parasitic diseases. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  J. Bull,et al.  MOLECULAR GENETICS OF ADAPTATION IN AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF COOPERATION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  D. Ebert Virulence and Local Adaptation of a Horizontally Transmitted Parasite , 1994, Science.

[13]  E. Traub THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF LYMPHOCYTIC CHORIOMENINGITIS IN WHITE MICE , 1936, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  M. Nowak,et al.  HOST POPULATION STRUCTURE AND THE EVOLUTION OF VIRULENCE: A “LAW OF DIMINISHING RETURNS” , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  D. Ebert Experimental evolution of parasites. , 1998, Science.

[16]  P. Ewald,et al.  Evolution of virulence , 2004, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America.

[17]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Transmission bottlenecks as determinants of virulence in rapidly evolving pathogens. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Zhong,et al.  Heligmosomoides polygyrus: resistance in inbred, outbred, and selected mice. , 1996, Experimental parasitology.

[19]  Alexander Grey,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and Its Applications , 1977 .

[20]  Maurice W. Sabelis,et al.  The Dynamics of Multiple Infection and the Evolution of Virulence , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[21]  S. Frank A kin selection model for the evolution of virulence , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  J. Bull,et al.  Short-sighted evolution and the virulence of pathogenic microorganisms. , 1994, Trends in microbiology.

[23]  J. Bull,et al.  Virulence evolution in a virus obeys a trade off , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  S. Levin,et al.  Selection of Intermediate Rates of Increase in Parasite-Host Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Rustom Antia,et al.  Within-Host Population Dynamics and the Evolution and Maintenance of Microparasite Virulence , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[26]  R M May,et al.  Epidemiology and genetics in the coevolution of parasites and hosts , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  D. Ebert,et al.  The evolution of parasitic diseases. , 1996, Parasitology today.

[28]  R M May,et al.  Coevolution of hosts and parasites , 1982, Parasitology.

[29]  M. van Baalen Coevolution of recovery ability and virulence. , 1998, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[30]  Sunetra Gupta,et al.  Dynamic interactions in malaria: host heterogeneity meets parasite polymorphism , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  V. Jansen,et al.  HOST LIFE HISTORY AND THE EVOLUTION OF PARASITE VIRULENCE , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  C. Dye,et al.  Heterogeneities in the transmission of infectious agents: implications for the design of control programs. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Schulman Jl Effects of immunity on transmission of influenza: experimental studies. , 1970 .

[34]  F R Adler,et al.  Evolution of virulence: a unified framework for coinfection and superinfection. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  P. Kaye Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[36]  M A Nowak,et al.  Intra-host versus inter-host selection: viral strategies of immune function impairment. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  S. Frank,et al.  Recognition and polymorphism in host-parasite genetics. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[38]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  The evolution of virulence , 1993, Nature.

[39]  M A Nowak,et al.  Superinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence. , 1994, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[40]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Coinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  M. Nowak,et al.  EVOLUTION OF VIRULENCE IN A HETEROGENEOUS HOST POPULATION , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Mutation and the evolution of virulence , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  S. Gandon,et al.  Evolution of parasite virulence against qualitative or quantitative host resistance , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  A. Read,et al.  GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PARASITE VIRULENCE AND TRANSMISSION IN THE RODENT MALARIA PLASMODIUM CHABAUDI , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  M. Nowak,et al.  The population dynamics of vertically and horizontally transmitted parasites , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.