Quantification of uncertainty in modelled partitioning and removal of heavy metals (Cu, Zn) in a stormwater retention pond and a biofilter.

Strategies for reduction of micropollutant (MP) discharges from stormwater drainage systems require accurate estimation of the potential MP removal in stormwater treatment systems. However, the high uncertainty commonly affecting stormwater runoff quality modelling also influences stormwater treatment models. This study identified the major sources of uncertainty when estimating the removal of copper and zinc in a retention pond and a biofilter by using a conceptual dynamic model which estimates MP partitioning between the dissolved and particulate phases as well as environmental fate based on substance-inherent properties. The two systems differ in their main removal processes (settling and filtration/sorption, respectively) and in the time resolution of the available measurements (composite samples and pollutographs). The most sensitive model factors, identified by using Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA), were related to the physical characteristics of the simulated systems (flow and water losses) and to the fate processes related to Total Suspended Solids (TSS). The model prediction bounds were estimated by using the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) technique. Composite samples and pollutographs produced similar prediction bounds for the pond and the biofilter, suggesting a limited influence of the temporal resolution of samples on the model prediction bounds. GLUE highlighted model structural uncertainty when modelling the biofilter, due to disregard of plant-driven evapotranspiration, underestimation of sorption and neglect of oversaturation with respect to minerals/salts. The results of this study however illustrate the potential for the application of conceptual dynamic fate models base on substance-inherent properties, in combination with available datasets and statistical methods, to estimate the MP removal in different stormwater treatment systems and compare with environmental quality standards targeting the dissolved MP fraction.

[1]  Ana Deletic,et al.  Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale , 2009 .

[2]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Ghassan Chebbo,et al.  Partition of pollution between dissolved and particulate phases: what about emerging substances in urban stormwater catchments? , 2011, Water research.

[4]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[5]  Luca Vezzaro,et al.  Modelling the fate of organic micropollutants in stormwater ponds. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Parameter and modeling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model , 2010 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[9]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Modelling urban stormwater treatment—A unified approach , 2006 .

[10]  E Lindblom,et al.  How uncertain is model-based prediction of copper loads in stormwater runoff? , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  J. B. Ellis,et al.  A pollutant removal prediction tool for stormwater derived diffuse pollution. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  Gilles Pujol,et al.  Simplex-based screening designs for estimating metamodels , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Eric D. Stein,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices Using Dynamic Modeling , 2008 .

[14]  B. De Baets,et al.  Combining multimedia models with integrated urban water system models for micropollutants. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling , 2008 .

[16]  J. Stedinger,et al.  Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method , 2008 .

[17]  M. Kayhanian,et al.  Toxicity of urban highway runoff with respect to storm duration. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  G. Freni,et al.  Uncertainty in water quality modelling: The applicability of Variance Decomposition Approach , 2010 .

[19]  E Lindblom,et al.  Comparative uncertainty analysis of copper loads in stormwater systems using GLUE and grey-box modeling. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  D. L. Parkhurst,et al.  User's guide to PHREEQC (Version 2)-a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations , 1999 .

[21]  Michael Matthies,et al.  Chemodynamics and Environmental Modeling: An Introduction , 1997 .

[22]  Peter Steen Mikkelsen,et al.  Risk assessment of xenobiotics in stormwater discharged to Harrestrup Å, Denmark , 2007 .

[23]  B E Hatt,et al.  Pollutant removal performance of field-scale stormwater biofiltration systems. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  K. Beven.  Environmental Modelling , 2007 .

[25]  L. Shawn Matott,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: A review of concepts and tools , 2009 .

[26]  T. M. Parchure,et al.  Erosion of soft cohesive sediment deposits , 1985 .

[27]  Keith Beven,et al.  Informal likelihood measures in model assessment: Theoretic development and investigation , 2008 .

[28]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[29]  J. B. Ellis,et al.  A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutant removal potentials. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Variance‐Based Methods , 2008 .

[31]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Urban runoff modelling uncertainty: Comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[32]  Jean-Luc Bertrand-Krajewski,et al.  Stormwater pollutant loads modelling: epistemological aspects and case studies on the influence of field data sets on calibration and verification. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[33]  W. Hogland,et al.  The impact of storm water runoff on a small urban stream , 2009 .

[34]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models. , 2008 .

[35]  M. Shafer,et al.  Physical and kinetic speciation of copper and zinc in three geochemically contrasting marine estuaries. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Calculating first-order sensitivity measures: A benchmark of some recent methodologies , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  C. Pinazo,et al.  Field and laboratory measurements of sediment erodibility: A comparison , 2003 .

[38]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[39]  T. Bentzen,et al.  Heavy Metal and PAH Concentrations in Highway Runoff Deposits Fractionated on Settling Velocities , 2009 .

[40]  P. S. Mikkelsen,et al.  Dynamic stormwater treatment unit model for micropollutants (STUMP) based on substance inherent properties. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[41]  E Lindblom,et al.  Uncertainty-based calibration and prediction with a stormwater surface accumulation-washoff model based on coverage of sampled Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd field data. , 2011, Water research.

[42]  P. Willems.  Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling. , 2008, Water research.

[43]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[44]  Mi-Hyun Park,et al.  Accuracy and precision of the volume-concentration method for urban stormwater modeling. , 2009, Water research.

[45]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[46]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters , 2002 .

[47]  P S Mikkelsen,et al.  Selected stormwater priority pollutants: a European perspective. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  L. Vezzaro.  Source-Flux-Fate Modelling of Priority Pollutants in Stormwater Systems , 2011 .

[49]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[50]  Tony Hoong Fatt Wong,et al.  Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds , 1999 .

[51]  J. Winterwerp,et al.  Turbulent exchange of fine sediments in a tidal channel in the Ems/Dollard estuary. Part II. Analysis with a 1DV numerical model , 2001 .

[52]  V. Singh,et al.  Evaluation of the subjective factors of the GLUE method and comparison with the formal Bayesian method in uncertainty assessment of hydrological models , 2010 .