Linking product functionality to historic failures to improve failure analysis in design

Prior research has shown that similar failure modes occur within products (or components) with similar functionality. To capitalize on this finding, a knowledge base-driven failure analysis tool, the function-failure design method (FFDM), has been developed to allow designers to perform failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) during conceptual design. The FFDM can offer substantial improvements to the design process since it enhances failure analysis thus giving it the ability to reduce the number of necessary redesigns. The FFDM, however, is only as good as the knowledge base that it draws from, and one fundamental question that arises in using the FFDM is: at what level of detail should functional descriptions of components be encoded? This paper explores two approaches to populating a knowledge base with actual failure occurrence information from Bell 206 helicopters. Results indicate that encoding failure data using more detailed functional models allows for a more robust knowledge base. Interestingly however, when applying FFDM, high level descriptions continue to produce useful results when using the knowledge base generated from the detailed functional models.

[1]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR CREATING A FUNCTION-BASED DESIGN TOOL FOR FAILURE MODE IDENTIFICATION , 2002 .

[2]  P. Schaefer,et al.  Using causal reasoning for automated failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) , 1992, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1992 Proceedings.

[3]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Experimental studies assessing the repeatability of a functional modeling derivation method , 2003 .

[4]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  A Computational Approach to Conceptual Design , 2002 .

[5]  J. A. Collins,et al.  The Failure-Experience Matrix—A Useful Design Tool , 1976 .

[6]  John E. Hunt,et al.  Failure mode effects analysis: A practical application of functional modeling , 1995, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[7]  Rüdiger Wirth,et al.  Knowledge-based support of system analysis for the analysis of Failure modes and effects , 1996 .

[8]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[9]  Manish Verma,et al.  Functional Modeling, Reverse Engineering, and Design Reuse , 2002 .

[10]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  REQUIREMENTS FOR A FAILURE MODE TAXONOMY FOR USE IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN , 2003 .

[11]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Mapping function to failure mode during component development , 2003 .

[12]  Chris Price Effortless incremental design FMEA , 1996, Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[13]  Manish Verma,et al.  Functional Modeling: Toward a Common Language for Design and Reverse Engineering , 2003 .

[14]  H. Schneider Failure mode and effect analysis : FMEA from theory to execution , 1996 .

[15]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Going Back in Time to Improve Design: The Elemental Function-Failure Design Method , 2003 .

[16]  S. Bednarz,et al.  Efficient analysis for FMEA (Space Shuttle reliability) , 1988, 1988. Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium,.

[17]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  ADVANCED FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX PROCESSES , 1999 .

[18]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Deriving Function-Failure Similarity Information for Failure-Free Rotorcraft Component Design , 2002 .

[19]  B. T. McKinney FMECA, the right way , 1991, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1991 Proceedings.