Assessing Online Learning Ability From a Social Exchange Perspective: A Survey of Virtual Teams Within Business Organizations

Drawing on social exchange theory, this study proposes a model by postulating critical antecedents and mediators as the key drivers of online learning ability. In the model, online learning ability is affected indirectly by trust via 3 mediators simultaneously, including team commitment, task conflict, and relationship conflict, whereas trust is impacted directly by expressiveness interdependence, outcome interdependence, and task interdependence. Empirical testing of this model, by investigating the personnel of virtual teams from information technology organizations, confirms the applicability of social exchange theory in understanding online learning ability. This study contributes to the virtual team learning literature by extending social exchange theory to the rarely explored area of online learning ability of organizational teams and validating idiosyncratic drivers of online learning ability. Last, this article provides managerial implications and limitations of the research.

[1]  Michael Stefanone,et al.  The Effects of Wireless Computing in Collaborative Learning Environments , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PROPORTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT COMPOSITION ON TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[3]  B. Emans,et al.  Motivating Effects of Task and Outcome Interdependence in Work Teams , 1998 .

[4]  Chieh-Peng Lin.  To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents , 2007 .

[5]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[6]  David Coleman,et al.  Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANs and Intranets , 1997 .

[7]  K. R. Moore,et al.  Social exchange behavior in logistics relationships: a shipper perspective , 1999 .

[8]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[9]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[10]  John P. Manzer,et al.  "Teach Us to Learn": Multivariate Analysis of Perception of Success in Team Learning , 2005 .

[11]  R. Slavin.  Research on Cooperative Learning: Consensus and Controversy. , 1990 .

[12]  Angeliki Poulymenakou,et al.  Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for e-Learning Applications: Beyond Functional Usability , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[14]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION CONTEXT: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEAM LEARNING AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[15]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Investigation of the Use of Navigation Tools in Web-Based Learning: A Data Mining Approach , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[17]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[18]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[19]  Christoph Schierz,et al.  The Effect of the Interface on Learning Style in a Simulation-Based Learning Situation , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Shankar Ganesan.  Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1994 .

[21]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[22]  M. Ruijters,et al.  Forum for organisational learning: combining learning at work, organisational learning and training in new ways , 2003 .

[23]  Lillian T. Eby,et al.  PROTÉGÉS NEGATIVE MENTORING EXPERIENCES: CONSTRUCT DEVELOPMENT AND NOMOLOGICAL VALIDATION , 2004 .

[24]  James A. Narus,et al.  A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships , 1990 .

[25]  Chieh-Peng Lin.  Examination of Gender Differences in Modeling OCBs and Their Antecedents in Business Organizations in Taiwan , 2008 .

[26]  P. Drucker,et al.  Looking ahead: implications of the present. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[27]  C. Heckler.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS™ System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1996 .

[28]  S. Hunt,et al.  Salesperson cooperation: The influence of relational, task, organizational, and personal factors , 2001 .

[29]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  Social exchange and union commitment: a comparison of union instrumentality and union support perceptions , 1995 .

[30]  van der Geert Vegt,et al.  Effects of Interdependencies in Project Teams , 1999 .

[31]  R. Liden,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective , 1997 .

[32]  Timo Lainema,et al.  Advancing Acquisition of Business Know-How , 2007 .

[33]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Intranets and Organizational Learning: A Research and Development Agenda , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Jixia Yang,et al.  Decoupling task and relationship conflict: the role of intragroup emotional processing , 2004 .

[35]  Ramsey F. Hamade,et al.  Learning Theory as Applied to Mechanical CAD Training of Novices , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[36]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[37]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Strategic Management of Technological Innovation , 2004 .

[38]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[39]  Minou Ella Mebane,et al.  Evaluation of the Efficacy of Affective Education Online Training in Promoting Academic and Professional Learning and Social Capital , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[40]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Cognitive Modeling of Student Learning in Web-Based Instructional Programs , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  The Value of Reciprocity , 2007, Social Psychology Quarterly.

[42]  Lone Dirckinck-Holmfeld,et al.  Dialogue Design-With Mutual Learning as Guiding Principle , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[44]  M. Neubert,et al.  The role of conscientiousness and extraversion in affecting the relationship between perceptions of group potency and volunteer group member selling behavior: An interactionist perspective , 2006 .

[45]  R. Golembiewski,et al.  The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes , 1975 .

[46]  Bodo B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  Pre-Testing in Questionnaire Design: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Further Research , 1993 .