The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry

We measured binocular rivalry between dichoptic, orthogonal, sinusoidal gratings both having spatial frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16 c deg-1 in fields ranging from 0.5 to 8 deg of visual angle in diameter. Total time that one or the other grating was exclusively visible had an inverted U-shaped relationship with spatial frequency, with the peak shifting to coarser spatial frequencies as the field size increased. We computed for each spatial frequency the maximum field size over which a criterion duration of exclusive visibility would spread. When expressed as areas, these sizes were inversely proportional to spatial frequency. This dependence of rivalry on spatial frequency is similar to those for stereopsis and fusion, consistent with the notion that all three binocular phenomena have a common mechanism.

[1]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[2]  R Blake,et al.  Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  C. Schor,et al.  Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis , 1984, Vision Research.

[4]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  R. V. Abadi,et al.  Induction masking—a study of some inhibitory interactions during dichoptic viewing , 1976, Vision Research.

[6]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Fusion under Scotopic Luminances , 1994, Perception.

[7]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  The spatial properties of binocular suppression zone , 1994, Vision Research.

[8]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[9]  M. Hollins,et al.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Hess,et al.  D max for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content , 1995, Vision Research.