Effects of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine on Hemodynamic Variables Following Direct Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Elective Surgery Patients

Background Laryngoscopy and intubation incur hemodynamic changes like increase in heart rate, arterial blood pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, wedge capillary pressure and arrhythmias. Anesthesiologists are continually in search of ways to alleviate such complications. Several medicinal methods have been suggested that serve the purpose including the administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate to minimize these unfavorable responses. This study compares the effects of intravenous administration of lidocaine and magnesium sulfate on unwanted hemodynamic responses following laryngoscopy and intubation in elective surgery candidates. Materials and Methods This randomized double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 60 ASA-I and ASA-II candidates who received 60 mg/kg (based on Lean Body Mass) magnesium sulfate or lidocaine randomly before intubation. Values of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were recorded for both groups during the 5 minutes following administration, and compared with baseline values. Results In both groups, systolic blood pressure increased compared to the baseline value. However, there was a significant difference between the two groups as this increase occurred within the first 3 minutes in the lidocaine group, while within the first minute in the magnesium sulfate group. The increase in diastolic blood pressure was not significant. But there was a significant difference in the mean arterial pressure increase between the two groups since in the magnesium sulfate group this increase occurred in the first minute whereas in the lidocaine group it occurred during the first two minutes. There was no significant difference in the heart rates after intubation between the two groups. Conclusion Magnesium sulfate is more effective than lidocaine in controlling hemodynamics, although it may increase the heart rate.

[1]  Y. Shin,et al.  Evaluation of dose effects of magnesium sulfate on rocuronium injection pain and hemodynamic changes by laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation , 2011, Korean journal of anesthesiology.

[2]  J. Min,et al.  Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction: remifentanil vs. lidocaine with esmolol. , 2010, Minerva anestesiologica.

[3]  M. Kawaguchi,et al.  The Efficacy of Landiolol for Suppressing the Hyperdynamic Response following Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review , 2009, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[4]  N. Turan,et al.  The use of esmolol and magnesium to prevent haemodynamic responses to extubation after coronary artery grafting , 2007, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[5]  K. Montazeri,et al.  A DOSE – RESPONSE STUDY OF MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN SUPPRESSING CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSES TO LARYNGOSCOPY & ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION , 2005 .

[6]  B. Sibai Magnesium sulfate prophylaxis in preeclampsia: Lessons learned from recent trials. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  E. Figueredo,et al.  Assessment of the efficacy of esmolol on the haemodynamic changes induced by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  L. Yeh,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of rocuronium-hypnotic sequence for rapid-sequence induction. , 2001, Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica.

[9]  D. Rowbotham,et al.  Comparison of effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  J. L. Atlee,et al.  The Use of Esmolol, Nicardipine, or Their Combination to Blunt Hemodynamic Changes After Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  W. Fawcett,et al.  Magnesium: physiology and pharmacology. , 1999, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  R. K. Suri,et al.  The Effect of Magnesium Sulphate on Hemodynamics and Its Efficacy in Attenuating the Response to Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  A. Kovac Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. , 1996, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[14]  R. Collins,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of oral captopril, of oral isosorbide mononitrate and of intravenous magnesium sulphate started early in acute myocardial infarction: safety and haemodynamic effects. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Pilot Study Investigators. , 1994, European heart journal.

[15]  M. Nieminen,et al.  The influence of intravenous magnesium sulphate on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery by-pass operation. , 1993, European heart journal.

[16]  F. Cervenko,et al.  Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in geriatric patients: effects of fentanyl, lidocaine and thiopentone , 1989, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.