Discrimination of binary coherent states using a homodyne detector and a photon number resolving detector

We investigate quantum measurement strategies capable of discriminating two coherent states probabilistically with significantly smaller error probabilities than can be obtained using nonprobabilistic state discrimination. We apply a postselection strategy to the measurement data of a homodyne detector as well as a photon number resolving detector in order to lower the error probability. We compare the two different receivers with an optimal intermediate measurement scheme where the error rate is minimized for a fixed rate of inconclusive results. The photon number resolving (PNR) receiver is experimentally demonstrated and compared to an experimental realization of a homodyne receiver with postselection. In the comparison, it becomes clear that the performance of the PNR receiver surpasses the performance of the homodyne receiver, which we prove to be optimal within any Gaussian operations and conditional dynamics.

[1]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement , 2007, Nature.

[2]  Masahide Sasaki,et al.  Demonstration of near-optimal discrimination of optical coherent states. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[3]  M. Dušek,et al.  Programmable discriminator of coherent states: Experimental realization , 2007, 0711.4712.

[4]  J. Cirac,et al.  Characterization of Gaussian operations and distillation of Gaussian states , 2002, quant-ph/0204085.

[5]  Jaromír Fiurásek,et al.  Experimental demonstration of continuous variable purification of squeezed States. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[6]  Gerd Leuchs,et al.  Continuous-variable quantum key distribution using polarization encoding and post selection , 2004, quant-ph/0403064.

[7]  J. Fiurášek.  Gaussian transformations and distillation of entangled Gaussian states. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[8]  Sasaki,et al.  Optimum decision scheme with a unitary control process for binary quantum-state signals. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[9]  Masahide Sasaki,et al.  Implementation of projective measurements with linear optics and continuous photon counting , 2005 .

[10]  C. Helstrom.  Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1969 .

[11]  Masahide Sasaki,et al.  Sub-shot-noise-limit discrimination of on-off keyed coherent signals via a quantum receiver with a superconducting transition edge sensor. , 2010, Optics express.

[12]  Masahiro Takeoka,et al.  Demonstration of coherent-state discrimination using a displacement-controlled photon-number-resolving detector. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[13]  G Leuchs,et al.  Continuous variable quantum cryptography: beating the 3 dB loss limit. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[14]  Philippe Grangier,et al.  Generation of optical ‘Schrödinger cats’ from photon number states , 2007, Nature.

[15]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[16]  Shin‐Tson Wu,et al.  Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics , 2012 .

[17]  S. Olivares,et al.  Gaussian states in continuous variable quantum information , 2005, quant-ph/0503237.

[18]  Konrad Banaszek.  Optimal receiver for quantum cryptography with two coherent states , 1999 .

[19]  Vikram Sharma,et al.  No-switching quantum key distribution using broadband modulated coherent light. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[20]  Resources for universal quantum-state manipulation and engineering , 2009, 0908.1476.

[21]  Matteo G. A. Paris,et al.  Binary optical communication in single-mode and entangled quantum noisy channels , 2003 .

[22]  Masahide Sasaki,et al.  Discrimination of the binary coherent signal: Gaussian-operation limit and simple non-Gaussian near-optimal receivers , 2007, 0706.1038.

[23]  Gisin,et al.  Quantum cryptography with coherent states. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[24]  G Leuchs,et al.  Distillation of squeezing from non-Gaussian quantum states. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[25]  D. Dieks.  Overlap and distinguishability of quantum states , 1988 .

[26]  S. A. Babichev,et al.  Remote preparation of a single-mode photonic qubit by measuring field quadrature noise. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[27]  N. Cerf,et al.  Quantum key distribution using gaussian-modulated coherent states , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Jaromir Fiurasek,et al.  Preparation of distilled and purified continuous-variable entangled states , 2008, 0812.0738.

[29]  I. Walmsley,et al.  Absolute efficiency estimation of photon-number-resolving detectors using twin beams. , 2009, Optics express.

[30]  J Eisert,et al.  Distilling Gaussian states with Gaussian operations is impossible. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[31]  J. Fiurášek,et al.  Optimal discrimination of mixed quantum states involving inconclusive results , 2002, quant-ph/0208126.

[32]  H. Lo,et al.  Quantum key distribution with dual detectors , 2006, quant-ph/0611044.

[33]  Ou,et al.  Probability distribution of photoelectric currents in photodetection processes and its connection to the measurement of a quantum state. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[34]  K. Willcox,et al.  Research Laboratory of Electronics , 2005 .

[35]  I. D. Ivanović.  How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states , 1987 .

[36]  K. Banaszek,et al.  Direct measurement of the Wigner function by photon counting , 1999 .

[37]  T. Ralph,et al.  Quantum-state engineering with continuous-variable postselection , 2005, quant-ph/0512094.

[38]  Radim Filip,et al.  Experimental entanglement distillation of mesoscopic quantum states , 2008, 0812.0709.

[39]  JM Geremia.  Distinguishing between optical coherent states with imperfect detection (9 pages) , 2004 .

[40]  A. Shimony,et al.  Optimal distinction between two non-orthogonal quantum states , 1995 .

[41]  S. Barnett,et al.  Strategies for discriminating between non-orthogonal quantum states , 1998 .

[42]  N. Lutkenhaus,et al.  Efficiency of coherent-state quantum cryptography in the presence of loss: Influence of realistic error correction , 2005, quant-ph/0512013.

[43]  R. Schnabel,et al.  Experimentally feasible purification of continuous-variable entanglement , 2007 .

[44]  A. Peres.  How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states , 1988 .