Assessment of Progressive Collapse Capacity of Earthquake-ResistantSteel Moment Frames Using Pushdown Analysis

The study investigates the progressive collapse resisting capacity of earthquake-resistant steel moment-resisting frames subjected to column failure. The aim is to investigate whether these structures are able to resist progressive collapse after column removal, that may represent a situation where an extreme event may cause a critical column to suddenly lose its load bearing capacity. Since the response to this abnormal loading condition is most likely to be dynamic and nonlinear, both nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The vertical pushover analysis (also called pushdown) is applied with two different procedures. The first one is the traditional procedure generally accepted in current guidelines that increases the load incrementally to a specified level after column has been removed. The second procedure tries to reproduce the timing of progressive collapse and, for this reason, gravity loads are applied to the undamaged structure before column removal. The load-displacement relationships obtained from pushdown analyses are compared with the results of incremental nonlinear dynamic analyses. The effect of various design variables, such as number of stories, number of bays, level of seismic design load, is investigated. The results are eventually used to evaluate the dynamic amplification factor to be applied in pushdown analysis for a more accurate estimation of the collapse

[1]  Taewan Kim,et al.  Investigation of Progressive Collapse-Resisting Capability of Steel Moment Frames Using Push-Down Analysis , 2009 .

[2]  Feng Fu,et al.  3-D nonlinear dynamic progressive collapse analysis of multi-storey steel composite frame buildings — Parametric study , 2010 .

[3]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of steel buildings subjected to column loss , 2011 .

[4]  Guoqing Xu,et al.  An energy-based partial pushdown analysis procedure for assessment of disproportionate collapse potential , 2011 .

[5]  Shalva Marjanishvili,et al.  COMPARISON OF VARIOUS PROCEDURES FOR PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ANALYSIS , 2006 .

[6]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Assessment of progressive collapse-resisting capacity of steel moment frames , 2009 .

[7]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 1990 .

[8]  Gary C. Hart,et al.  The structural design of tall and special buildings , 2005 .

[9]  Young-Ho Lee,et al.  Progressive collapse resisting capacity of braced frames , 2008 .

[10]  Eric B. Williamson,et al.  Static Equivalency in Progressive Collapse Alternate Path Analysis: Reducing Conservatism While Retaining Structural Integrity , 2006 .

[11]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Progressive collapse resisting capacity of moment frames with viscous dampers , 2010 .

[12]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss — Part I: Simplified assessment framework , 2008 .

[13]  Charalampos Baniotopoulos,et al.  Steel moment frames column loss analysis: The influence of time step size , 2011 .

[14]  Massimiliano Ferraioli,et al.  Progressive collapse of seismic resistant multistory frame buildings , 2012 .

[15]  Massimiliano Ferraioli,et al.  Behaviour Factor of code-designed steel moment-resisting frames , 2014 .

[16]  Leslaw Kwasniewski,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic simulations of progressive collapse for a multistory building , 2010 .