Joint optimization of collimator and reconstruction parameters in SPECT imaging for lesion quantification

Obtaining the best possible task performance using reconstructed SPECT images requires optimization of both the collimator and reconstruction parameters. The goal of this study is to determine how to perform this optimization, namely whether the collimator parameters can be optimized solely from projection data, or whether reconstruction parameters should also be considered. In order to answer this question, and to determine the optimal collimation, a digital phantom representing a human torso with 16 mm diameter hot lesions (activity ratio 8:1) was generated and used to simulate clinical SPECT studies with parallel-hole collimation. Two approaches to optimizing the SPECT system were then compared in a lesion quantification task: sequential optimization, where collimation was optimized on projection data using the Cramer–Rao bound, and joint optimization, which simultaneously optimized collimator and reconstruction parameters. For every condition, quantification performance in reconstructed images was evaluated using the root-mean-squared-error of 400 estimates of lesion activity. Compared to the joint-optimization approach, the sequential-optimization approach favoured a poorer resolution collimator, which, under some conditions, resulted in sub-optimal estimation performance. This implies that inclusion of the reconstruction parameters in the optimization procedure is important in obtaining the best possible task performance; in this study, this was achieved with a collimator resolution similar to that of a general-purpose (LEGP) collimator. This collimator was found to outperform the more commonly used high-resolution (LEHR) collimator, in agreement with other task-based studies, using both quantification and detection tasks.

[1]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I , 1968 .

[2]  C E Metz,et al.  A comparison of optimum detector spatial resolution in nuclear imaging based on statistical theory and on observer performance. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Gengsheng L. Zeng,et al.  A channelized hotelling trace collimator design method based on reconstruction rather than projections , 2001 .

[4]  Georges El Fakhri,et al.  Collimator optimization for detection and quantitation tasks: application to gallium-67 imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Bin Liu,et al.  Strategies to jointly optimize spect collimator and reconstruction parameters for a detection task , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[6]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  Michael Ljungberg,et al.  Dopamine D2 receptor SPECT with (123)I-IBZM: evaluation of collimator and post-filtering when using model-based compensation-a Monte Carlo study. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Factors influencing lesion detection in medical imaging. , 1990 .

[9]  M F Kijewski,et al.  Collimator optimization for lesion detection incorporating prior information about lesion size. , 1995, Medical physics.

[10]  M F Kijewski,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation: a mathematical model for quantitation in nuclear medicine. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[12]  C E Metz,et al.  Optimum detector spatial resolution for discriminating between tumour uptake distributions in scintigraphy. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Adaptive SPECT , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Gene Gindi,et al.  Collimator optimization in SPECT based on a joint detection and localization task. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  R. Huesman A new fast algorithm for the evaluation of regions of interest and statistical uncertainty in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Raymond F. Muzic,et al.  A method to correct for scatter, spillover, and partial volume effects in region of interest analysis in PET , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  E. L. Keller,et al.  Optimum dimensions of parallel-hole, multi-aperture collimators for gamma-ray cameras. , 1968, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Bin Zhang,et al.  High-Resolution Versus High-Sensitivity SPECT Imaging With Geometric Blurring Compensation for Various Parallel-Hole Collimation Geometries , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[20]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Choice of collimator for cardiac SPET when resolution compensation is included in iterative reconstruction , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Freek J. Beekman,et al.  Influence of collimator hole dimensions on parallel and cone-beam brain SPECT , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[22]  Eric Clarkson,et al.  Estimating random signal parameters from noisy images with nuisance parameters: linear and scanning-linear methods. , 2008, Optics express.

[23]  Robert N. Beck,et al.  Collimator Design Using Ray-Tracing Techniques , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.