Understanding the structural characteristics of a firm’s whole buyer–supplier network and its impact on international business performance

[1]  Gabriel R. G. Benito,et al.  Domestic alliance networks and regional strategies of MNEs: A structural embeddedness perspective , 2018, Journal of International Business Studies.

[2]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  A data-analytics approach to identifying hidden critical suppliers in supply networks: Development of nexus supplier index , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Liena Kano Global value chain governance: A relational perspective , 2018 .

[4]  Ekaterina Turkina,et al.  Global connectedness and local innovation in industrial clusters , 2018 .

[5]  Katsuki Aoki,et al.  The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer-Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case , 2017, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Jan Johanson,et al.  From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years , 2017 .

[7]  Alok R. Saboo,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Customer Concentration on Initial Public Offering and Balance Sheet–Based Outcomes , 2017 .

[8]  Dries Faems,et al.  Alliance Concentration in Multinational Companies: Examining Alliance Portfolios, Firm Structure, and Firm Performance , 2017 .

[9]  Guangzhi Shang,et al.  Impact of supply base structural complexity on financial performance: Roles of visible and not‐so‐visible characteristics , 2017 .

[10]  Ian Wilkinson,et al.  Firm Internationalization from a Network-Centric Complex-Systems Perspective , 2017 .

[11]  Jan‐Erik Vahlne,et al.  Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): Case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA , 2017 .

[12]  Sudarshan Iyengar,et al.  Privacy Preserving Network Analysis of Distributed Social Networks , 2016, ICISS.

[13]  M. Forsgren A note on the revisited Uppsala internationalization process model – the implications of business networks and entrepreneurship , 2016 .

[14]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐ and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research , 2016 .

[15]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  If It Takes a Village to Foster Innovation, Success Depends on the Neighbors: The Effects of Global and Ego Networks on New Product Launches , 2016 .

[16]  Minyoung Kim Geographic scope, isolating mechanisms, and value appropriation , 2016 .

[17]  Rahul C. Basole Topological analysis and visualization of interfirm collaboration networks in the electronics industry , 2016, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Assessing Performance Outcomes in Marketing , 2016 .

[19]  V. Swaminathan,et al.  What Goes around Comes around: The Impact of Marketing Alliances on Firm Risk and the Moderating Role of Network Density , 2015 .

[20]  Peter Zemsky,et al.  Value creation and value capture under moral hazard: Exploring the micro‐foundations of buyer– supplier relationships , 2015 .

[21]  Suleika Bort,et al.  SME internationalization modes in the German biotechnology industry: The influence of imitation, network position, and international experience , 2015 .

[22]  Carsten Zimmermann,et al.  Linking strategic flexibility and operational efficiency: the mediating role of ambidextrous operational capabilities , 2014 .

[23]  Andrea Vinelli,et al.  The green bullwhip effect: Transferring environmental requirements along a supply chain , 2014 .

[24]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Customer Orientation Structure for Internet-Based Business-to-Business Platform Firms , 2014 .

[25]  Marcus A. Bellamy,et al.  The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation , 2014 .

[26]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  A Theory of the Nexus Supplier: A Critical Supplier from a Network Perspective , 2014 .

[27]  Dong-Young Kim,et al.  Understanding supplier structural embeddedness: A social network perspective , 2014 .

[28]  S. Benoit,et al.  Chain liability in multitier supply chains? Responsibility attributions for unsustainable supplier behavior , 2014 .

[29]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Beating Competitors to International Markets: The Value of Geographically Balanced Networks for Innovation , 2014 .

[30]  Xin Li Can Yin-Yang Guide Chinese Indigenous Management Research? , 2014, Management and Organization Review.

[31]  Adam M. Kleinbaum,et al.  RESPONSIVENESS : THE SOCIAL STRUCTURAL MICROFOUNDATIONS OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES , 2014 .

[32]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[33]  Sameer Kumar,et al.  Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of ‘Energy Fuels’, 2009–2011 , 2013, Scientometrics.

[34]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Network analysis of supply chain systems: A systematic review and future research , 2013, Syst. Eng..

[35]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Clusters, Connectivity and Catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the Global Economy , 2013 .

[36]  Charles Dhanaraj,et al.  Home-region orientation in international expansion strategies , 2013 .

[37]  Chia-Wen Hsu,et al.  International ambidexterity and firm performance in small emerging economies , 2013 .

[38]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Supplier Innovation Generation in Customer-Supplier Relationships: The Role of Power-Dependence , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[39]  Amanda P. Cowen An Expanded Model of Status Dynamics: The Effects of Status Transfer and Interfirm Coordination , 2012 .

[40]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Social Network Research in Organizational Contexts , 2012 .

[41]  Christoph Stadtfeld,et al.  Events in Social Networks: A Stochastic Actor-oriented Framework for Dynamic Event Processes in Social Networks , 2012 .

[42]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity , 2012 .

[43]  A. Young Mostly Harmless Econometrics , 2012 .

[44]  U. Zander,et al.  Knowledge and Strategy Creation in Multinational Companies , 2011 .

[45]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆ , 2011 .

[46]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Network Theory , 2013 .

[47]  B. A. Gilbert,et al.  Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures , 2011 .

[48]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach , 2011 .

[49]  R. Kauffman,et al.  The inside story of relationship development: power asymmetry in a buyer-supplier relationship , 2011 .

[50]  P. Ellis,et al.  Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization , 2011 .

[51]  Darcy K. Fudge Kamal,et al.  Creating trust in piranha-infested waters: The confluence of buyer, supplier and host country contexts , 2011 .

[52]  Changsu Kim,et al.  The Global Research-and-Development Network and Its Effect on Innovation , 2010 .

[53]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  Does Accommodating a Self-Serving Partner in an International Marketing Alliance Pay Off? , 2010 .

[54]  Ahmet H. Kirca,et al.  A Multilevel Examination of the Drivers of Firm Multinationality: A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[55]  A. Roth,et al.  The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance , 2010 .

[56]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Multivariate Behavioral Research Quantifying and Testing Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models When the Constituent Paths Are Nonlinear , 2022 .

[57]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[58]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  Home Country Networks and Foreign Expansion: Evidence from the Venture Capital Industry , 2010 .

[59]  Zhiang Lin,et al.  A multilevel framework of firm boundaries: Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes , 2010 .

[60]  A. Zaheer,et al.  It's the Connections: The Network Perspective in Interorganizational Research , 2010 .

[61]  K. Train,et al.  A Control Function Approach to Endogeneity in Consumer Choice Models , 2010 .

[62]  H. Milanov,et al.  The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication , 2010 .

[63]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership , 2009 .

[64]  Yadong Luo,et al.  An Ambidexterity Perspective Toward Multinational Enterprises From Emerging Economies , 2009 .

[65]  C. Moorman,et al.  Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation , 2009 .

[66]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  The Two Faces of Control: Network Closure and Individual Performance among Knowledge Workers , 2009 .

[67]  Zeki Simsek Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[68]  S. Borgatti,et al.  On Social Network Analysis in a Supply Chain Context , 2009 .

[69]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations , 2009 .

[70]  Ramkumar Janakiraman,et al.  How Customer Portfolio Affects New Product Development in Technology-Based Entrepreneurial Firms , 2008 .

[71]  Arun Rai,et al.  Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[72]  James R. Brown,et al.  On what makes a significant contribution to the retailing literature , 2008 .

[73]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research , 2008 .

[74]  S. Lazzarini,et al.  Buyer–Supplier and Supplier–Supplier Alliances: Do They Reinforce or Undermine One Another? , 2008 .

[75]  Alan M. Rugman,et al.  The regional nature of Japanese multinational business , 2008 .

[76]  Michael Jensen,et al.  Staging Exchange Partner Choices: When Do Status and Reputation Matter? , 2008 .

[77]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[78]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[79]  Jun Dong,et al.  Understanding network concepts in modules , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[80]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[81]  Justin W. Webb,et al.  A multi‐theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains , 2007 .

[82]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[83]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The Supply Base and Its Complexity: Implications For Transaction Costs, Risks, Responsiveness, and Innovation , 2006 .

[84]  N. Coviello The network dynamics of international new ventures , 2006 .

[85]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[86]  I. Geyskens,et al.  The Formation of Buyer–Supplier Relationships: Detailed Contract Drafting and Close Partner Selection , 2005 .

[87]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[88]  Mark S. Granovetter The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes Social Networks and Economic Outcomes: Core Principles , 2022 .

[89]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[90]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Edge vulnerability in neural and metabolic networks , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[91]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[92]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  The evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory , 2003 .

[93]  J. Spencer,et al.  Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure: a longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge-diffusion networks , 2003 .

[94]  M. Kotabe,et al.  The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms , 2003 .

[95]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[96]  A. Rugman,et al.  Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: internalization and strategic management perspectives , 2003 .

[97]  R. Jacobson,et al.  Trading off between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis , 2003 .

[98]  C. Hardy,et al.  Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields , 2002 .

[99]  Kentaro Nobeoka,et al.  The Influence of Customer Scope on Supplier Learning and Performance in the Japanese Automobile Industry , 2002 .

[100]  D. Ernst,et al.  Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion and Local Capability Formation , 2002 .

[101]  David Knoke,et al.  How Organizational Field Networks Shape Interorganizational Tie-Formation Rates , 2002 .

[102]  Wenpin Tsai Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[103]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[104]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[105]  A. Rugman,et al.  Subsidiary‐specific advantages in multinational enterprises , 2001 .

[106]  Rodney C. Shrader Collaboration and Performance in Foreign Markets: The Case of Young High-Technology Manufacturing Firms , 2001 .

[107]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[108]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[109]  Shane R. Thye A Status Value Theory of Power in Exchange Relations , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[110]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[111]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Organizational Evolution in the interorganizational Environment: Incentives and Constraints on International Expansion Strategy , 1998 .

[112]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[113]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[114]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  International Risk and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: The Dimensionality and Internal Consistency of Miller's Measure , 1996 .

[115]  K. Provan,et al.  A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems , 1995 .

[116]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Dependence and Control as Predictors of Opportunism in Dealer-Supplier Relations , 1989 .

[117]  J.-C. Spender,et al.  Industry recipes : an enquiry into the nature and sources of managerial judgement , 1989 .

[118]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[119]  B. Wellman Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. , 1988 .

[120]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[121]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[122]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[123]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[124]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .