EORTC Radiation Oncology Group quality assurance platform: establishment of a digital central review facility.

OBJECTIVE Quality assurance (QA) in clinical trials is essential to ensure treatment is safely and effectively delivered. As QA requirements have increased in complexity in parallel with evolution of radiation therapy (RT) delivery, a need to facilitate digital data exchange emerged. Our objective is to present the platform developed for the integration and standardization of QART activities across all EORTC trials involving RT. METHODS The following essential requirements were identified: secure and easy access without on-site software installation; integration within the existing EORTC clinical remote data capture system; and the ability to both customize the platform to specific studies and adapt to future needs. After retrospective testing within several clinical trials, the platform was introduced in phases to participating sites and QART study reviewers. RESULTS The resulting QA platform, integrating RT analysis software installed at EORTC Headquarters, permits timely, secure, and fully digital central DICOM-RT based data review. Participating sites submit data through a standard secure upload webpage. Supplemental information is submitted in parallel through web-based forms. An internal quality check by the QART office verifies data consistency, formatting, and anonymization. QART reviewers have remote access through a terminal server. Reviewers evaluate submissions for protocol compliance through an online evaluation matrix. Comments are collected by the coordinating centre and institutions are informed of the results. CONCLUSIONS This web-based central review platform facilitates rapid, extensive, and prospective QART review. This reduces the risk that trial outcomes are compromised through inadequate radiotherapy and facilitates correlation of results with clinical outcomes.

[1]  C. Fiorino,et al.  Contouring variability of the penile bulb on CT images: quantitative assessment using a generalized concordance index. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  P. Lambin,et al.  Design of and technical challenges involved in a framework for multicentric radiotherapy treatment planning studies. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  D. Thwaites,et al.  Vorsprung durch Technik: evolution, implementation, QA and safety of new technology in radiotherapy. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  James A Purdy,et al.  Quality assurance issues in conducting multi-institutional advanced technology clinical trials. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M. Bolla,et al.  Quality assurance of the 22961 EORTC trial. A phase III study of the optimal combination of hormonal adjuvant treatment by LHRH analogue and radiation therapy for the management of locally advanced prostate cancer: the dummy run. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Steve Webb,et al.  Evaluating the relationship between erectile dysfunction and dose received by the penile bulb: using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397). , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  James E Lingeman,et al.  Internet based multi-institutional clinical research: a convenient and secure option. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Sydes,et al.  Implementing the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) RT01 trial (ISRCTN 47772397): methods and practicalities of a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in men with localised prostate cancer. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Analysis of outcomes in radiation oncology: an integrated computational platform. , 2009, Medical physics.

[10]  W. F. Van den Bogaert,et al.  A glance on quality assurance in EORTC study 22922 evaluating techniques for internal mammary and medial supraclavicular lymph node chain irradiation in breast cancer. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Damien C Weber,et al.  Dummy run and conformity indices in the ongoing EORTC low-grade glioma trial 22033-26033: First evaluation of quality of radiotherapy planning. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  E. Yorke,et al.  Improving normal tissue complication probability models: the need to adopt a "data-pooling" culture. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. , 2003, Medical physics.

[14]  L. Collette,et al.  EORTC 22972-26991/MRC BR10 trial: fractionated stereotactic boost following conventional radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. Clinical and quality-assurance results of the stereotactic boost arm. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Richard Hanusik,et al.  Processes for quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  D. Olsen,et al.  Telemedicine in radiotherapy treatment planning: requirements and applications. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  E. Rutgers,et al.  Quality assurance of axillary radiotherapy in the EORTC AMAROS trial 10981/22023: the dummy run. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Standardizing naming conventions in radiation oncology. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  N. Spry,et al.  Detailed review and analysis of complex radiotherapy clinical trial planning data: evaluation and initial experience with the SWAN software system. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  H. Eich,et al.  Initiation of a teleradiotherapeutic network for patients in German lymphoma studies. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  V. Kouloulias Quality assurance in radiotherapy. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[22]  Günter Schreier,et al.  Development of an electronic database for quality assurance of radiotherapy in the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (Europe) high risk neuroblastoma study. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Bill J. Salter,et al.  WE‐C‐214‐07: A Global Digital Benchmark and QA Data Center for Radiotherapy Quality Assurance , 2011 .

[24]  K. Haustermans,et al.  173 oral PROCARE /RT PART/: IMPROVING CARE OF RECTAL CANCER IN BELGIUM BY STANDARDIZING CTV DELINEATION , 2011 .

[25]  P. Lambin,et al.  393 poster AD-HOC DATA SHARING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR RADIOTHERAPY RESEARCH COLLABORATION: A TOOL FOR MULTICENTRIC CLINICAL RESEARCH , 2011 .

[26]  Jean-Yves Giraud,et al.  Quality assurance of the EORTC trial 22911. A phase III study of post-operative external radiotherapy in pathological stage T3N0 prostatic carcinoma: the dummy run. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[27]  Damien C Weber,et al.  Quality assurance for prospective EORTC radiation oncology trials: the challenges of advanced technology in a multicenter international setting. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  A Dusserre,et al.  Quality assurance of the EORTC radiotherapy trial 22863 for prostatic cancer: the dummy run. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Quality assurance of the EORTC radiotherapy trial 22931 for head and neck carcinomas: the dummy run. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  M. Piérart,et al.  Quality assurance in the EORTC 22921 trial on preoperative radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: evaluation of the individual case review procedure. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[31]  D. Huyskens,et al.  Quality assurance of EORTC trial 22922/10925 investigating the role of internal mammary--medial supraclavicular irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer: the individual case review. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[32]  W. Curran,et al.  1011 : A Review of the Activities of the ITC in Support of RTOG Advanced Technology Clinical Trials , 2006 .

[33]  Jean-Yves Giraud,et al.  Quality assurance in the 22991 EORTC ROG trial in localized prostate cancer: dummy run and individual case review. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[34]  Walter J Curran,et al.  Redesigning radiotherapy quality assurance: opportunities to develop an efficient, evidence-based system to support clinical trials--report of the National Cancer Institute Work Group on Radiotherapy Quality Assurance. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  H. Bartelink,et al.  Quality assurance of the EORTC trial 22881/10882: "assessment of the role of the booster dose in breast conserving therapy": the Dummy Run. EORTC Radiotherapy Cooperative Group. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.