This study attempts to better understand a limited segment of the drug-abusing population, especially individuals who repeatedly use crack and other drugs. This article addresses the methodological strategies and underlying paradigms informing the recruitment of hard-to-reach and ill-defined subpopulations of crack abusers and noncrack drug abusers. Subjects were recruited from diverse social contexts: streets or communities where most drug users do their business, arrested persons who were released, jail inmates, probationers and parolees, prison inmates, and treatment settings. A systematic comparison of subject attributes across recruitment locales and with other, similar target groups is presented. The utility and external comparability of the recruitment techniques are supported by the findings.
[1]
Terry Williams,et al.
PERSONAL SAFETY IN DANGEROUS PLACES
,
1992,
Journal of contemporary ethnography.
[2]
E. Dunlap,et al.
The setting for the crack era: macro forces, micro consequences (1960-1992).
,
1992,
Journal of psychoactive drugs.
[3]
J. Fagan,et al.
Criminal Justice Responses to Crack
,
1991
.
[4]
C. Holden.
Street-wise crack research.
,
1989,
Science.
[5]
D. Lipton,et al.
Taking Care of Business: The Economics of Crime by Heroin Abusers.
,
1986
.