Evolution of a typical ion‐scale magnetic flux rope caused by thermal pressure enhancement

With high time‐resolution field and plasma measurements by the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft, interior fine structures of two ion‐scale magnetic flux ropes (~5 and ~11 ion inertial length radius) separated by ~14 s are resolved. These two ion‐scale flux ropes (FR1 and FR2) show non‐frozen‐in ion behavior and consist of a strong axial magnetic field at the reversal of the negative‐then‐positive bipolar field component. The negative bipolar field component of the FR2 is found to be depressed, where magnetic pressure and total pressure decrease, but ion and electron thermal pressures increase, a feature akin to a crater‐like flux rope. The pressure enhancement is due to the magnetosheath plasma feeding into the flux rope along the field lines. Magnetic field draping and energetic electrons are also observed in the trailing part of the FR2. The ratio of perpendicular and parallel currents indicates that the FR1 appears force‐free but the FR2 seems not. Moreover, the FR2 is time‐dependent as a result of a low correlation coefficient (CC = 0.75) for the derivation of the deHoffmann‐Teller frame using the direct measured electric fields, while the FR1 is in quasi‐steady conditions (CC = 0.94). It is concluded that the crater formation within the FR2 can be interpreted by the analytical flux rope simulation as the evolution of typical flux rope to crater‐like one due to the thermal pressure enhancement, which could be induced by the depression of transverse magnetic fields of the flux rope.

[1]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  Force balance at the magnetopause determined with MMS: Application to flux transfer events , 2016 .

[2]  D. Gershman,et al.  The substructure of a flux transfer event observed by the MMS spacecraft , 2016 .

[3]  P. Lindqvist,et al.  Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission observations and non‐force free modeling of a flux transfer event immersed in a super‐Alfvénic flow , 2016 .

[4]  C. Russell,et al.  Ion‐scale secondary flux ropes generated by magnetopause reconnection as resolved by MMS , 2016, Geophysical research letters.

[5]  U. Gliese,et al.  Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale , 2016 .

[6]  Thomas E. Moore,et al.  Magnetospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives , 2016 .

[7]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers , 2016 .

[8]  P. Lindqvist,et al.  The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS , 2016 .

[9]  R. Nakamura,et al.  Coalescence of magnetic flux ropes in the ion diffusion region of magnetic reconnection , 2015, Nature Physics.

[10]  M. Abdullah,et al.  On the evolution of a magnetic flux rope: Two‐dimensional MHD simulation results , 2015 .

[11]  H. Karimabadi,et al.  Correlation of core field polarity of magnetotail flux ropes with the IMF By: Reconnection guide field dependency , 2014 .

[12]  M. Kivelson,et al.  Evidence that crater flux transfer events are initial stages of typical flux transfer events , 2010 .

[13]  S. Schwartz Shock and Discontinuity Normals, Mach Numbers, and Related Parameters , 1998 .

[14]  A. Khrabrov,et al.  DeHoffmann-Teller Analysis , 1998 .

[15]  C. Farrugia,et al.  A multi‐instrument study of flux transfer event structure , 1988 .

[16]  I. Papamastorakis,et al.  Plasma and magnetic field characteristics of magnetic flux transfer events , 1982 .