The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading

A series of multiple regression analyses was conducted on a corpus of eye movement data to examine whether the influence of properties of words n-1 and n+1 on the time spent fixating word n changes as a function of whether word n is associated with a punctuation mark (i.e., whether or not a punctuation mark separates word n from either word n-1 or word n+1). The results suggest that distributed processing is not significantly impaired. However, punctuation marks also carry word class information and word classes are not evenly distributed across positions relative to punctuation marks. Word class probability does modulate parafoveal-on-foveal effects.

[1]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[3]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Alan Kennedy.  On keeping word order straight , 2003 .

[5]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[6]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[7]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Chapter 22 – Commas and Spaces: Effects of Punctuation on Eye Movements and Sentence Parsing , 2000 .

[9]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal Processing in Word Recognition , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  K. Rayner.  Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Visual Search, and Scene Perception , 1995 .

[13]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  David A. Balota.  Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[15]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[16]  G. Underwood.  Cognitive processes in eye guidance , 2005 .

[17]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[18]  David A. Balota,et al.  Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (A Travel Update) , 2006 .

[19]  K. Rayner,et al.  Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements , 2006 .

[20]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Foveal Load and Parafoveal Processing , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  Adam Reeves,et al.  Color as a factor analytic approximation to Nature , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[25]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading , 1998 .

[26]  K. Rayner,et al.  Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .

[27]  A. Kennedy,et al.  An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French , 2006, Vision Research.

[28]  Wayne S. Murray.  Commentary on Section 4 – Sentence Processing: Issues and Measures , 2000 .

[29]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2005, Vision Research.

[30]  Keith Rayner,et al.  On the Processing of Meaning from Parafoveal Vision During Eye Fixations in Reading , 2003 .

[31]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  The mind's eye : cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2003 .

[33]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Eye movement research : mechanisms, processes and applications , 1995 .

[35]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990 .