Utilizing Instructional Consultations to Enhance the Teaching Performance of Engineering Faculty

Although many kinds of data can be used to guide instructional consultations, research comparing the efficacy of such data is scant, especially in engineering. In this study, multiple modes of assessment were used to evaluate the impact of consultations informed by different kinds of data. This study illuminates two key aspects of instructional consultations: (1) their efficacy varies depending on the kind of data used to guide them, with student feedback from a Small Group Instructional Diagnosis (SGID) having the largest positive impact, and (2) the instructional consultant plays a key role in helping both interpret the available data and identify strategies for improvement. These findings suggest three implications for practice: (1) whenever possible, SGID-based consultations should be offered systematically and proactively for engineering faculty, (2) data for other kinds of consultations should be tailored to the needs of the individual instructor, and (3) instructional consultants should be available to collaborate with faculty to enhance their teaching, thereby building an engineering culture that actively supports teaching and learning.

[1]  B. Keller,et al.  Effects of Student-Centered Teaching on Student Evaluations in Calculus , 1999 .

[2]  Robert T. Blackburn,et al.  Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction , 1995 .

[3]  H. Marsh,et al.  Multidimensional Students' Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness: A Profile Analysis. , 1993 .

[4]  Kathleen T. Brinko Instructional Consultation with Feedback in Higher Education. , 1990 .

[5]  Peter A. Cohen,et al.  Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings , 1980 .

[6]  M. R. Diamond,et al.  The usefulness of structured mid-term feedback as a catalyst for change in higher education classes , 2004 .

[7]  Kathleen T. Brinko,et al.  Using Video Recall forImproving ProfessionalCompetency in InstructionalConsultation , 1989 .

[8]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[9]  R. Menges,et al.  Improving College Teaching: A Critical Review of Research , 1979 .

[10]  Maryellen Weimer,et al.  Improving College Teaching: Strategies for Developing Instructional Effectiveness. The Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series. , 1990 .

[11]  R. C. Wilson Improving Faculty Teaching: Effective Use of Student Evaluations and Consultants. , 1986 .

[12]  M. D. Sorcinelli Research findings on the seven principles , 1991 .

[13]  Mark V. Redmond,et al.  Small Group Instructional Diagnosis: Final Report. , 1982 .

[14]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  College Teaching , 1961 .

[15]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The Use of Students’ Evaluations and an Individually Structured Intervention to Enhance University Teaching Effectiveness , 1993 .

[16]  H. G. Murray,et al.  Classroom teaching behaviors related to college teaching effectiveness , 1985 .

[17]  William E. Cashin,et al.  Do College Teachers Who Voluntarily Have Courses Evaluated Receive Higher Student Ratings , 1983 .

[18]  William E. Cashin Student Ratings of Teaching: The Research Revisited , 1982 .

[19]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Toward an Integrated Approach to Instructional Consultation , 1999 .

[20]  William E. Cashin Students do rate different academic fields differently , 1990 .

[21]  Kathleen T. Brinko The Practice of Giving Feedback to Improve Teaching: What Is Effective?. , 1993 .

[22]  Kathleen T. Brinko,et al.  Effects of Student Evaluation Feedback: A Meta-Analysis of Higher Education Research. , 1986 .

[23]  Beverly Black Using the SGID Method for a Variety of Purposes , 1998 .

[24]  H. Marsh Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness , 1984 .

[25]  Owen Hicks A Conceptual Framework for Instructional Consultation. , 1999 .

[26]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[27]  How Individual Consultation Affects Teaching , 1999 .

[28]  S. Piccinin,et al.  The impact of individual consultation on the teaching of younger versus older faculty , 2002 .

[29]  L. M. Aleamoni Student Rating Myths Versus Research Facts from 1924 to 1998 , 1999 .

[30]  Kathleen T. Brinko,et al.  Methodological explanations for the modest effects of feedback from student ratings. , 1990 .

[31]  P. Cranton,et al.  Reconsidering the Unit of Analysis: A Model of Student Ratings of Instruction. , 1990 .

[32]  Carolina Cristi,et al.  The impact of individual consultation on student ratings of teaching , 1999 .

[33]  Charles A. Burdsal,et al.  The Relative Merits of Different Types of Overall Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness , 2004 .

[34]  Glenn R. Erickson,et al.  Improving College Teaching: An Evaluation of a Teaching Consultation Procedure , 1979 .