Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation: Effects on brain resting state oscillatory and network activity

Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation (tcDCS) can offer new insights into the cerebellar function and disorders, by modulating noninvasively the activity of cerebellar networks. Taking into account the functional interplay between the cerebellum and the cerebral cortex, we addressed the effects of unilateral tcDCS (active electrode positioned over the right cerebellar hemisphere) on the electroencephalographic (EEG) oscillatory activity and on the cortical network organization at resting state. Effects on spectral (de)synchronizations and functional connectivity after anodal and cathodal stimulation were assessed with respect to a sham condition. A lateralized synchronization over the sensorimotor area in gamma band, as well as an increase of the network segregation in sensory-motor rhythms and a higher communication between hemispheres in gamma band, were detected after anodal stimulation. The same measures after cathodal tcDCS returned responses similar to the sham condition.

[1]  Alberto Priori,et al.  Cerebellar tDCS: How to Do It , 2014, The Cerebellum.

[2]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  EEG Resting-State Brain Topological Reorganization as a Function of Age , 2016, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[3]  K. Sameshima,et al.  Connectivity Inference between Neural Structures via Partial Directed Coherence , 2007 .

[4]  K. Walsh.  The Cerebellum: Brain for an Implicit Self , 2012 .

[5]  Luca Faes,et al.  Critical Comments on EEG Sensor Space Dynamical Connectivity Analysis , 2016, Brain Topography.

[6]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high‐resolution EEG recordings , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[8]  M. Cotelli,et al.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with ataxia: A double‐blind, randomized, sham‐controlled study , 2015, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[9]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Investigating statistical differences in connectivity patterns properties at single subject level: A new resampling approach , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Sara Marceglia,et al.  Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Impairs the Practice-dependent Proficiency Increase in Working Memory , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Peter Mariën,et al.  tDCS of the Cerebellum: Where Do We Stand in 2016? Technical Issues and Critical Review of the Literature , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[14]  Sangeetha Madhavan,et al.  Polarity Independent Effects of Cerebellar tDCS on Short Term Ankle Visuomotor Learning , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[15]  P. Celnik,et al.  Modulation of Cerebellar Excitability by Polarity-Specific Noninvasive Direct Current Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Catherine J. Stoodley,et al.  Cerebellar tDCS as a novel treatment for aphasia? Evidence from behavioral and resting-state functional connectivity data in healthy adults. , 2016, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.