Economic Feasibility of a New Method to Estimate Mortality in Crisis-Affected and Resource-Poor Settings

Introduction Mortality data provide essential evidence on the health status of populations in crisis-affected and resource-poor settings and to guide and assess relief operations. Retrospective surveys are commonly used to collect mortality data in such populations, but require substantial resources and have important methodological limitations. We evaluated the feasibility of an alternative method for rapidly quantifying mortality (the informant method). The study objective was to assess the economic feasibility of the informant method. Methods The informant method captures deaths through an exhaustive search for all deaths occurring in a population over a defined and recent recall period, using key community informants and next-of-kin of decedents. Between July and October 2008, we implemented and evaluated the informant method in: Kabul, Afghanistan; Mae La camp for Karen refugees, Thai-Burma border; Chiradzulu District, Malawi; and Lugufu and Mtabila refugee camps, Tanzania. We documented the time and cost inputs for the informant method in each site, and compared these with projections for hypothetical retrospective mortality surveys implemented in the same site with a 6 month recall period and with a 30 day recall period. Findings The informant method was estimated to require an average of 29% less time inputs and 33% less monetary inputs across all four study sites when compared with retrospective surveys with a 6 month recall period, and 88% less time inputs and 86% less monetary inputs when compared with retrospective surveys with a 1 month recall period. Verbal autopsy questionnaires were feasible and efficient, constituting only 4% of total person-time for the informant method's implementation in Chiradzulu District. Conclusions The informant method requires fewer resources and incurs less respondent burden. The method's generally impressive feasibility and the near real-time mortality data it provides warrant further work to develop the method given the importance of mortality measurement in such settings.

[1]  P. Nyasulu,et al.  Rates and causes of death in Chiradzulu District, Malawi, 2008: a key informant study , 2011, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[2]  P. Nyasulu,et al.  A new method to estimate mortality in crisis-affected and resource-poor settings: validation study , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  R. Grais,et al.  Learning lessons from field surveys in humanitarian contexts: a case study of field surveys conducted in North Kivu, DRC 2006-2008 , 2009, Conflict and health.

[4]  C. Mathers,et al.  Violence-related mortality in Iraq from 2002 to 2006. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  H. Aiga Bombarding people with questions: a reconsideration of survey ethics. , 2007, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[6]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Setting international standards for verbal autopsy. , 2007, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[7]  P. Spiegel,et al.  A review of methodology and analysis of nutrition and mortality surveys conducted in humanitarian emergencies from October 1993 to April 2004 , 2007, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[8]  P. Spiegel Who should be undertaking population-based surveys in humanitarian emergencies? , 2007, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[9]  F. Checchi,et al.  Wanted: studies on mortality estimation methods for humanitarian emergencies, suggestions for future research , 2007, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[10]  F. Checchi,et al.  HPN Network Paper 52: Interpreting and using mortality data in humanitarian emergencies: a primer for non-epidemiologists , 2005 .