A probability load modeling method for the charging demand of large-scale PEVs accounting users’ charging willingness

Abstract This paper presents a new strategy in order to model the charging power demand due to large-scale plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) as realistic a fashion as possible and analyze their impact on the residential power distribution system. The strategy takes the charging willingness of PEV users into consideration, and accounts for the difference in charging frequencies among users. A detailed classification, derived from the historical data on users’ driving patterns, on PEV users is conducted in order to ensure that users in the same user set have the same charging properties. Seven probability load models for PEV charging are established for these user sets, and each model accounts the inherent randomness in the usages and recharges of PEVs. After the consideration of charging willingness, the charging demand differs among weekdays. The aggregated charging demand from a user set on each weekday is calculated based on the Law of Large Numbers, and the total charging demand from all PEVs on each weekday can be obtained by accumulating the aggregated charging demand of the user sets with charging willingness. The strategy can ensure a high utilization of the battery capacity, and the aggregated charging demand resulted is more rational and credible. The proposed charging load modeling strategy is finally applied on the electric load profile on a winter day in Manitoba.

[1]  Alstom Grid,et al.  Analysis on Dynamic Probabilistic Characteristic of Power Grid Connected With Electric Vehicle Charging Load and Wind Power , 2013 .

[2]  P Frías,et al.  Assessment of the Impact of Plug-in Electric Vehicles on Distribution Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  J. C. Gomez,et al.  Impact of EV battery chargers on the power quality of distribution systems , 2002 .

[4]  A. Maitra,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of plug-in electric vehicle loading on distribution system operations , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[5]  Shaahin Filizadeh,et al.  Profile of Charging Load on the Grid Due to Plug-in Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  B. Scrosati,et al.  Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future , 2010 .

[7]  W. M. Grady,et al.  A procedure for derating a substation transformer in the presence of widespread electric vehicle battery charging , 1997 .

[8]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  W. M. Grady,et al.  A statistical analysis of the effect of electric vehicle battery charging on distribution system harmonic voltages , 1998 .

[10]  Xu Hao,et al.  Optimal placement of charging infrastructures for large-scale integration of pure electric vehicles into grid , 2013 .

[11]  W. M. Grady,et al.  A statistical method for predicting the net harmonic currents generated by a concentration of electric vehicle battery chargers , 1997 .

[12]  A. Keane,et al.  Optimal Charging of Electric Vehicles in Low-Voltage Distribution Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Yue Yuan,et al.  Modeling of Load Demand Due to EV Battery Charging in Distribution Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.