Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for fluency-based recognition memory

Two experiments investigated the influence of perceptual fluency on recognition memory. Words were studied using a shallow encoding task to decrease the contribution of recollection on recognition. Fluency was manipulated by blurring half of the test probes. Clarity varied randomly across trials in one experiment and was grouped into two blocks (clear and blurry) in the other experiment. Clarity did not influence recognition judgments or the ERP correlate of familiarity (FN400) when clarity was blocked across trials, but fluent probes (old and clear) elicited a more negative ERP than less fluent probes 280-400 ms at parietal electrode sites. Random variations in clarity produced the opposite pattern of results because recognition judgments and FN400 amplitudes varied, whereas the early ERPs did not differ. The results are interpreted as evidence that blocking clarity across trials led to recognition that was based on repetition fluency differences (i.e., old more fluent than new), which was associated with an early (280-400 ms) ERP at parietal electrodes in the absence of FN400 differences. Randomly varying clarity across trials created a situation where repetition fluency and perceptual fluency (i.e., probe clarity) interacted and led recognition to be based on familiarity/conceptual implicit memory that was associated with FN400 amplitudes in the absence of early ERP differences. The behavioral and ERP differences suggest that perceptual fluency, by itself, is capable of supporting recognition in some contexts and that, in other contexts, fluency can combine with other memory trace information to support recognition.

[1]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  The impact of fluency on explicit memory tasks in amnesia , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[2]  T. Curran,et al.  Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  Event-related Potentials Associated with Masked Priming of Test Cues Reveal Multiple Potential Contributions to Recognition Memory , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Brian P. Kurilla,et al.  An ERP investigation into the strategic regulation of the fluency heuristic during recognition memory , 2012, Brain Research.

[6]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming Famous Overnight: Limits on the Ability to Avoid Unconscious Influences of the Past , 1989 .

[9]  Julie Y. Huang,et al.  Smooth Trajectories Travel Farther into the Future: Perceptual Fluency Effects on Prediction of Trend Continuation. , 2011, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[10]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality , 1990 .

[11]  Brian P. Kurilla,et al.  Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Jeremy K. Miller,et al.  Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Validating neural correlates of familiarity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007). , 2007, Psychological review.

[15]  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. , 2001 .

[16]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[17]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[18]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection , 2012, NeuroImage.

[19]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Response to Paller et al.: the role of familiarity in making inferences about unknown quantities , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  J. Wixted.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[23]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[24]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Assuming too much from ‘familiar’ brain potentials , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[26]  Jeremy K. Miller,et al.  The attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: the role of expectation , 2002 .

[27]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[28]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[29]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[30]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  D. Westerman.  Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences the Porous Boundaries between Explicit and Implicit Memory: Behavioral and Neural Evidence , 2022 .

[34]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[35]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[36]  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. , 2001 .

[37]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  B. W. Whittlesea.  Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[39]  T. Curran,et al.  Event-related potential (ERP) correlates of memory blocking and priming during a word fragment test. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[40]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Real-Time Neural Signals of Perceptual Priming with Unfamiliar Geometric Shapes , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.