Role of recruitment in causing differences between intertidal assemblages on seawalls and rocky shores

Following progressive urbanisation of coastal areas, artificial structures are becoming common features of landscapes in shallow waters. Despite this, few studies have focused on the ecological role of these structures or have attempted to assess the extent to which they can act as surrogates for natural habitats. This study investigated whether colonisation of space can determine the occurrence of different intertidal assemblages on rocky shores and sandstone seawalls in Sydney Harbour (New South Wales, Australia). Areas were cleared on rocky shores and seawalls at 3 different locations to test hypotheses from 2 alternative models: (1) patterns of distribution and abundance of organisms on the 2 types of structure are the direct result of different patterns of recruitment and (2) early stages of development of assemblages are the same on the 2 types of structure, but later processes (post-recruitment) differ between structures, producing different older assemblages. Furthermore, the model that assemblages developing in clearings on each structure would converge toward mature assemblages found on the same type of structure was tested. Assemblages in clearings differed between seawalls and rocky shores from the early stages of succession and differences persisted through time. Although there was variability among locations, these assemblages tended to converge toward mature assemblages on the same type of structure. These results support the model that intrinsic differences (e.g. topography, weathering, shape and extent of surfaces) between seawalls and rocky shores could affect the recruitment of algae and invertebrates, leading to the establishment of distinct assemblages. This knowledge could improve our ability to design artificial structures that more closely mimic natural habitats, potentially mitigating some effects of loss and fragmentation of coastal habitats in urban areas.

[1]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Differences Between Subtidal Epibiota on Pier Pilings and Rocky Reefs at Marinas in Sydney, Australia , 1999 .

[2]  S. Connell,et al.  Why do floating structures create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota , 2002 .

[3]  A. Dye.  Community-level analyses of long-term changes in rocky littoral fauna from South Africa , 2006 .

[4]  E. R. Hobbs.  Species richness of urban forest patches and implications for urban landscape diversity , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[5]  P. Archambault,et al.  Influence of shoreline configuration on spatial variation of meroplanktonic larvae, recruitment and diversity of benthic subtidal communities , 1999 .

[6]  M. Bertness,et al.  Snail grazing and the abundance of algal crusts on a sheltered New England rocky beach , 1983 .

[7]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[8]  J. Lubchenco,et al.  Community Development and Persistence in a Low Rocky Intertidal Zone , 1978 .

[9]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Effects of substratum on the recruitment and development of an intertidal estuarine fouling assemblage , 1994 .

[10]  J. Connell.  The consequences of variation in initial settlement vs. post-settlement mortality in rocky intertidal communities , 1985 .

[11]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Intertidal seawalls—new features of landscape in intertidal environments , 2003 .

[12]  G. Williams,et al.  Do factors influencing recruitment ultimately determine the distribution and abundance of encrusting algae on seasonal tropical shores , 1997 .

[13]  B. Menge,et al.  Algal recruitment and the maintenance of a plant mosaic in the low intertidal region on the Oregon coast , 1993 .

[14]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas , 2001 .

[15]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Experiments on factors influencing settlement, survival, and growth of two species of barnacles in new south wales , 1979 .

[16]  F. Bacchiocchi,et al.  Distribution and dynamics of epibiota on hard structures for coastal protection , 2003 .

[17]  M. Chapman,et al.  Paucity of mobile species on constructed seawalls: effects of urbanization on biodiversity , 2003 .

[18]  P. Fairweather,et al.  Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  G. Daigle,et al.  Scales of substratum heterogeneity, structural complexity, and the early establishment of a marine epibenthic community☆ , 1994 .

[20]  Frederic E. Clements,et al.  Nature and Structure of the Climax , 1936 .

[21]  M. Anderson,et al.  Effects of gastropod grazers on recruitment and succession of an estuarine assemblage: a multivariate and univariate approach , 1997, Oecologia.

[22]  R. Wenning,et al.  Sources of pollution and sediment contamination in Newark Bay, New Jersey. , 1995, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[23]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Intertidal assemblages on artificial and natural habitats in marinas on the north-west coast of Italy , 2004 .

[24]  L. Benedetti‐Cecchi.  PREDICTING DIRECT AND INDIRECT INTERACTIONS DURING SUCCESSION IN A MID-LITTORAL ROCKY SHORE ASSEMBLAGE , 2000 .

[25]  Wayne P. Sousa,et al.  Intertidal Mosaics: Patch Size, Propagule Availability, and Spatially Variable Patterns of Succession , 1984 .

[26]  P. Archambault,et al.  Scales of coastal heterogeneity and benthic intertidal species richness, diversity and abundance , 1996 .

[27]  W. Hamner,et al.  Topographically Controlled Fronts in the Ocean and Their Biological Influence , 1988, Science.

[28]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Do urban structures influence local abundance and diversity of subtidal epibiota? A case study from Sydney Harbour, Australia , 1999 .

[29]  A. Cazenave,et al.  Sea Level Rise During Past 40 Years Determined from Satellite and in Situ Observations , 2001, Science.

[30]  John S. Gray,et al.  Marine biodiversity: patterns, threats and conservation needs , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[31]  P. Dayton.  Competition, Disturbance, and Community Organization: The Provision and Subsequent Utilization of Space in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1971 .

[32]  L. Levin,et al.  Artificial armored shorelines: sites for open-coast species in a southern California bay , 2002 .

[33]  M. Chapman,et al.  Inconsistency and variation in the development of rocky intertidal algal assemblages , 1998 .

[34]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Long term effects of Ascophyllum nodosum canopy removal on mid shore community structure , 2004, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[35]  A. Abelson,et al.  Settlement of Marine Organisms in Flow , 1997 .

[36]  M. Anderson,et al.  Seasonal and temporal aspects of recruitment and succession in an intertidal estuarine fouling assemblage , 1994, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[37]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[38]  L. Draper,et al.  Has the north-east Atlantic become rougher? , 1988, Nature.

[39]  D. Schiel,et al.  Wave-related mortality in zygotes of habitat-forming algae from different exposures in southern New Zealand: the importance of ‘stickability’ , 2003 .

[40]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[41]  G. Williams,et al.  Distribution of algae on tropical rocky shores: spatial and temporal patterns of non-coralline encrusting algae in Hong Kong , 1996 .

[42]  Hugh M. Caffey,et al.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SETTLEMENT AND RECRUITMENT OF INTERTIDAL BARNACLES , 1985 .

[43]  Grazing by two species of limpets on artificial reefs in the northwest Mediterranean. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.