1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy

Background The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to detect and localize prostate cancer has increased in recent years. In 2010, the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) published guidelines for mpMRI and introduced the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for scoring the different parameters. Purpose To evaluate the reliability and diagnostic performance of endorectal 1.5-T mpMRI using the PI-RADS to localize the index tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy. Material and Methods This institutional review board IRB-approved, retrospective study included 63 patients (mean age, 60.7 years, median PSA, 8.0). Three observers read mpMRI parameters (T2W, DWI, and DCE) using the PI-RADS, which were compared with the results from whole-mount histopathology that analyzed 27 regions of interest. Inter-observer agreement was calculated as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) by dichotomizing the PI-RADS criteria scores ≥3. A receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was performed for the different MR parameters and overall score. Results Inter-observer agreement on the overall score was 0.41. The overall score in the peripheral zone achieved sensitivities of 0.41, 0.60, and 0.55 with an NPV of 0.80, 0.84, and 0.83, and in the transitional zone, sensitivities of 0.26, 0.15, and 0.19 with an NPV of 0.92, 0.91, and 0.92 for Observers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The ROC analysis showed a significantly increased area under the curve (AUC) for the overall score when compared to T2W alone for two of the three observers. Conclusion 1.5 T mpMRI using the PI-RADS to localize the index tumor achieved moderate reliability and diagnostic performance.

[1]  Martin Biermann,et al.  A simple versatile solution for collecting multidimensional clinical data based on the CakePHP web application framework , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[2]  J. Bomers,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Prostate Transition Zone: Histopathological Validation Using Magnetic Resonance–Guided Biopsy Specimens , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[3]  J. Babb,et al.  Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  C. Jilg,et al.  3 Tesla multiparametric MRI for GTV-definition of Dominant Intraprostatic Lesions in patients with Prostate Cancer – an interobserver variability study , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[5]  P. Albers,et al.  Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard , 2013, European Radiology.

[6]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer by using diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy at 3 T. , 2013, Radiology.

[7]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[8]  Emilie Niaf,et al.  Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study , 2013, European Radiology.

[9]  Fang-Ming Deng,et al.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MRI for index lesion localization--a multiple-reader study. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[11]  Yousef Mazaheri,et al.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2011, Radiology.

[12]  B. Carey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. , 2011, European urology.

[13]  P Abel,et al.  Histological characteristics of the index lesion in whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens: implications for focal therapy , 2011, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[14]  Lars Egevad,et al.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume , 2010, Modern Pathology.

[15]  P. Choyke,et al.  Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation. , 2010, Radiology.

[16]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Urology.

[17]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Description of magnetic resonance imaging‐derived enhancement variables in pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and normal peripheral zone regions , 2009, BJU international.

[18]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Computerized analysis of prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. , 2008, Medical physics.

[19]  Byung Kwan Park,et al.  Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Location at 3T Using a Phased-Array Coil: Preliminary Results , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[20]  M. Kattan,et al.  The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis , 2007, BJU international.

[21]  A. Villers,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[22]  H. Huisman,et al.  Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[23]  Evis Sala,et al.  Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[24]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in normal and abnormal prostate tissues as defined by biopsy, MRI, and 3D MRSI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  T. Stamey,et al.  Prognostic factors for multifocal prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of significance of secondary cancers. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[26]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  G S Karczmar,et al.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: Input functions derived from reference tissues , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Estimation of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens in routine clinical practice. , 1997, American journal of clinical pathology.

[29]  P. Walsh,et al.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. , 1994, JAMA.

[30]  D. Collett Modelling Binary Data , 1991 .

[31]  T. Stamey,et al.  Zonal Distribution of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Histologic Pattern and Direction of Spread , 1988, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[32]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[33]  B. Margolin,et al.  An Analysis of Variance for Categorical Data , 1971 .

[34]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. , 2014, European urology.

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  M. Reiser,et al.  Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Prediction of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: incremental value of adding endorectal MR imaging to the Kattan nomogram. , 2007, Radiology.