The Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST): A scoping review of empirical studies

The evaluation of telemedicine can be achieved using different evaluation models or theoretical frameworks. This paper presents a scoping review of published studies which have applied the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST). MAST includes pre-implementation assessment (e.g. by use of participatory design), followed by multidisciplinary assessment, including description of the patients and the application and assessment of safety, clinical effectiveness, patient perspectives, economic aspects organisational aspects and socio-cultural, legal and ethical aspects. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. In this article, research design and methods used in the multidisciplinary assessment are described, strengths and weaknesses are analysed, and recommendations for future research are presented.

[1]  Jane Clemensen,et al.  Telemedical treatment at home of diabetic foot ulcers , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[2]  Mickael Bech,et al.  A MODEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF TELEMEDICINE APPLICATIONS: MAST , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[3]  A. Stewart,et al.  Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach , 1992 .

[4]  Andrea Manca,et al.  Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: Recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[5]  H. Mistry Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years , 2012, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  Jane Clemensen,et al.  Participatory design methods in telemedicine research , 2016, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  Caroline Sanders,et al.  The Contradictions of Telehealth User Experience in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  Kjeld Møller Pedersen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring of diabetic foot ulcer patients , 2018, Health Informatics J..

[9]  H. Mistry,et al.  Critical appraisal of published systematic reviews assessing the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine studies. , 2014, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[10]  Anne Moen,et al.  Evaluation of Ambient Assisted Living Interventions - Which Tool to Choose? , 2014, Nursing Informatics.

[11]  Albert Alonso,et al.  Integrated care services: lessons learned from the deployment of the NEXES project , 2015, International journal of integrated care.

[12]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[13]  J. Clemensen,et al.  Telemedicine in Neonatal Home Care: Identifying Parental Needs Through Participatory Design , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[14]  Niilo Saranummi,et al.  Telemonitoring and Mobile Phone-Based Health Coaching Among Finnish Diabetic and Heart Disease Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  John Hansen,et al.  Development and Testing of the Intelligent Bed for Heart Failure Patients: A Feasibility Study , 2015 .

[16]  D. B. Danbjørg,et al.  Do families after early postnatal discharge need new ways to communicate with the hospital? A feasibilility study. , 2014, Midwifery.

[17]  Tomas Hellström,et al.  Transferability and Naturalistic Generalization: New Generalizability Concepts for Social Science or Old Wine in New Bottles? , 2008 .

[18]  S. Evans,et al.  Application and Results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (Mansa) , 1999, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[19]  Alison Bowes,et al.  Early telemedicine training and counselling after hospitalization in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a feasibility study , 2015, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[20]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[21]  Claudio Dario,et al.  Large Controlled Observational Study on Remote Monitoring of Pacemakers and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators: A Clinical, Economic, and Organizational Evaluation , 2016, Interactive journal of medical research.

[22]  Caroline Sanders,et al.  Quantifying beliefs regarding telehealth: Development of the Whole Systems Demonstrator Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  Claudio Dario,et al.  Telemonitoring of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Italy. , 2017, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[24]  Dorthe Boe Danbjørg,et al.  Designing, Developing, and Testing an App for Parents Being Discharged Early Postnatally , 2014 .

[25]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[26]  Finn Børlum Kristensen,et al.  The HTA Core Model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[27]  P. Jones,et al.  A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[28]  M. Bech,et al.  The effect of real-time teleconsultations between hospital-based nurses and patients with severe COPD discharged after an exacerbation , 2013, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[29]  D. Ebert,et al.  Implementing and up-scaling evidence-based eMental health in Europe: The study protocol for the MasterMind project , 2015 .

[30]  Kristian Kidholm,et al.  Validity of the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine: A Delphi study , 2016, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[31]  Dirkje S Postma,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2003 .

[32]  Victoria Wade,et al.  Theoretical frameworks in telemedicine research , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[33]  I. Durand-zaleski,et al.  Efficacy and cost effectiveness of telemedicine for improving access to care in the Paris region: study protocols for eight trials , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.

[34]  MistryHema,et al.  Critical Appraisal of Published Systematic Reviews Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine Studies , 2014 .

[35]  Claudia Hildebrand,et al.  Modular ICT-based patient empowerment framework for self-management of diabetes: Design perspectives and validation results , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[36]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: a retrospective , 2013 .

[37]  C. Clifford Attkisson,et al.  The UCSF Client Satisfaction Scales: I. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. , 1999 .

[38]  S. Toubro,et al.  Long-Term Effect of Interactive Online Dietician Weight Loss Advice in General Practice (LIVA) Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, International journal of family medicine.

[39]  D. B. Danbjørg,et al.  Intervention among new parents followed up by an interview study exploring their experiences of telemedicine after early postnatal discharge. , 2015, Midwifery.

[40]  Knud Bonnet Yderstraede,et al.  A qualitative study of the key factors in implementing telemedical monitoring of diabetic foot ulcer patients , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[41]  Victoria Wade,et al.  Mixed methods for telehealth research , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[42]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[43]  B. Espehaug,et al.  Telemedicine Versus Standard Follow-Up Care for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial (DiaFOTo) , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[44]  Alison Bowes,et al.  Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[45]  Jens Lauritsen,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Telemedical and Standard Outpatient Monitoring of Diabetic Foot Ulcers , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[46]  Albert Alonso,et al.  An adaptive case management system to support integrated care services: Lessons learned from the NEXES project , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[47]  S. Newman,et al.  Assessment of Patients’ Perception of Telemedicine Services Using the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire , 2016, International journal of integrated care.

[48]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach , 1997 .

[49]  J. Clemensen,et al.  “If only had I known”: a qualitative study investigating a treatment of patients with a hip fracture with short time stay in hospital , 2017, International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being.

[50]  Milada Cvancarova Småstuen,et al.  A Low-Intensity Mobile Health Intervention With and Without Health Counseling for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 1: Baseline and Short-Term Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Norwegian Part of RENEWING HEALTH , 2014, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.