Non-human Looking Robot Arms Induce Illusion of Embodiment

We examine whether non-human looking humanoid robot arms can be perceived as part of one’s own body. In two subsequent experiments, participants experienced high levels of embodiment of a robotic arm that had a blue end effector with no fingers (Experiment 1) and of a robotic arm that ended with a gripper (Experiment 2) when it was stroked synchronously with the real arm. Levels of embodiment were significantly higher than the corresponding asynchronous condition and similar to those reported for a human-looking arm. Additionally, we found that visuo-movement synchronization also induced embodiment of the robot arm and that embodiment was even partially maintained when the robot hand was covered with a blue plastic cover. We conclude that humans are able to experience a strong sense of embodiment towards non-human looking robot arms. The results have important implications for the domains related to robotic embodiment.

[1]  Olivier Stasse,et al.  A versatile Generalized Inverted Kinematics implementation for collaborative working humanoid robots: The Stack Of Tasks , 2009, ICAR.

[2]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  Self awareness and the body image. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Causal reasoning with forces , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  G. Ganesh,et al.  The role of functionality in the body model for self-attribution , 2016, Neuroscience Research.

[6]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human–Robot Interaction , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[7]  T. Metzinger,et al.  Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Francesco Ferrari,et al.  Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[9]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Humanlike robot hands controlled by brain activity arouse illusion of ownership in operators , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[10]  F. Pavani,et al.  The Role of Hand Size in the Fake-Hand Illusion Paradigm , 2007, Perception.

[11]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Embodiment of a humanoid robot is preserved during partial and delayed control , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[12]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[13]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality , 2012, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[14]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[16]  Charles Spence,et al.  Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  What is embodiment? A psychometric approach , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  A. Greenwald.  Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? , 1976 .

[20]  René F. Kizilcec,et al.  The Relationship between Virtual Self Similarity and Social Anxiety , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  An integrated framework for humanoid embodiment with a BCI , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[23]  J. Davidson,et al.  Mini‐SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder , 2001, Depression and anxiety.

[24]  Veronica J. Santos,et al.  A Robot Hand Testbed Designed for Enhancing Embodiment and Functional Neurorehabilitation of Body Schema in Subjects with Upper Limb Impairment or Loss , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Virtual Hand Illusion Induced by Visuomotor Correlations , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  Jun'ichiro Seyama,et al.  The Uncanny Valley: Effect of Realism on the Impression of Artificial Human Faces , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[27]  J. Hohwy,et al.  Explaining Away the Body: Experiences of Supernaturally Caused Touch and Touch on Non-Hand Objects within the Rubber Hand Illusion , 2010, PloS one.

[28]  R. Rapee,et al.  Psychometric properties of the mini-social phobia inventory. , 2009, Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[29]  M. Slater,et al.  The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  The second me: Seeing the real body during humanoid robot embodiment produces an illusion of bi-location , 2016, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[32]  Peter Brugger,et al.  The robot hand illusion: Inducing proprioceptive drift through visuo-motor congruency , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  D. Sackett.  Bias in analytic research. , 1979, Journal of chronic diseases.

[34]  D. Lloyd.  Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  Laura Aymerich-Franch,et al.  Presence and Emotions in Playing a Group Game in a Virtual Environment: The Influence of Body Participation , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  Fumio Kanehiro,et al.  Humanoid robot HRP-2 , 2008, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.