Two-Lesion Kinetic Model of Double-Strand Break Rejoining and Cell Killing

Abstract Stewart, R. D. Two-Lesion Kinetic Model of Double-Strand Break Rejoining and Cell Killing. Radiat. Res. 156, 365–378 (2001). Radiobiological models, such as the lethal and potentially lethal (LPL) model and the repair-misrepair (RMR) model, have been reasonably successful at explaining the cell killing effects of radiation. However, the models have been less successful at relating cell killing to the formation, repair and misrepair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are widely accepted as the main type of DNA damage responsible for radiation-induced cell killing. A fully satisfactory model should be capable of predicting cell killing for a wide range of exposure conditions using a single set of model parameters. Moreover, these same parameters should give realistic estimates for the initial DSB yield, the DSB rejoining rate, and the residual number of unrepaired DSBs after all repair is complete. To better link biochemical processing of the DSB to cell killing, a two-lesion kinetic (TLK) model is proposed. In the TLK model, the family of all possible DSBs is subdivided into simple and complex DSBs, and each kind of DSB may have its own repair characteristics. A unique aspect of the TLK model is that break ends associated with both kinds of DSBs are allowed to interact in pairwise fashion to form irreversible lethal and nonlethal damages. To test the performance of the TLK model, nonlinear optimization methods are used to calibrate the model based on data for the survival of CHO cells for an extensive set of single-dose and split-dose exposure conditions. Then some of the postulated mechanisms of action are tested by comparing measured and predicted estimates of the initial DSB yield and the rate of DSB rejoining. The predictions of the TLK model for CHO cell survival and the initial DSB yield and rejoining rate are all shown to be in good agreement with the measured data. Studies suggest a yield of about 25 DSBs Gy−1 cell−1. About 20 DSBs Gy−1 cell−1 are rejoined quickly (15-min repair half-time), and 4 to 6 DSBs Gy−1 cell−1 are rejoined very slowly (10- to 15-h repair half-time). Both the slowly and fast-rejoining DSBs make substantial contributions to the killing of CHO cells by radiation. Although the TLK model provides a much more satisfactory formalism to relate biochemical processing of DSBs to cell killing than did the earlier kinetic models, some small differences among the measured and predicted CHO cell survival and DSB rejoining data suggest that additional factors and processes not considered in the present work may affect biochemical processing of DSBs and hence cell killing.

[1]  J. Schwartz Alterations in chromosome structure and variations in the inherent radiation sensitivity of human cells. , 1998, Radiation research.

[2]  G. Iliakis,et al.  Comparison of DNA double-strand break rejoining as measured by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, neutral sucrose gradient centrifugation and non-unwinding filter elution in irradiated plateau-phase CHO cells. , 1991, International journal of radiation biology.

[3]  J. Bedford,et al.  An ionizing radiation-sensitive mutant of CHO cells: irs-20. II. Dose-rate effects and cellular recovery processes. , 1993, Radiation research.

[4]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[5]  P. Bryant,et al.  Higher-order chromatin structure-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks: modeling the elution of DNA from nucleoids. , 1997, Radiation research.

[6]  P. Hanawalt Genomic instability: environmental invasion and the enemies within. , 1997, Mutation research.

[7]  R K Sachs,et al.  The linear-quadratic model and most other common radiobiological models result in similar predictions of time-dose relationships. , 1998, Radiation research.

[8]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[9]  P. Jeggo Identification of genes involved in repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. , 1998, Radiation research.

[10]  J. Bedford,et al.  An ionizing radiation-sensitive mutant of CHO cells: irs-20. III. Chromosome aberrations, DNA breaks and mitotic delay. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[11]  E. Dikomey Induction and repair of DNA strand breaks in X-irradiated proliferating and quiescent CHO cells. , 1990, International journal of radiation biology.

[12]  R K Sachs,et al.  Underprediction of visibly complex chromosome aberrations by a recombinational-repair ('one-hit') model. , 2000, International journal of radiation biology.

[13]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Kinetics of DSB rejoining and formation of simple chromosome exchange aberrations. , 2000, International journal of radiation biology.

[14]  Lawrence F. Shampine,et al.  A User’s View of Solving Stiff Ordinary Differential Equations , 1979 .

[15]  H. Dertinger,et al.  The DNA content of some mammalian cells measured by flow cytometry and its influence on radiation sensitivity. , 1990, International journal of radiation biology.

[16]  S B Curtis,et al.  Lethal and potentially lethal lesions induced by radiation--a unified repair model. , 1986, Radiation research.

[17]  P. Hahnfeldt,et al.  Recent data obtained by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis suggest two types of double-strand breaks. , 1998, Radiation research.

[18]  P. Gill,et al.  Model Building and Practical Aspects of Nonlinear Programming , 1985 .

[19]  J. Phillips,et al.  Analysis of restriction enzyme-induced DNA double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster ovary cells by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: implications for chromosome damage. , 1991, Radiation research.

[20]  J. Dahm-Daphi,et al.  Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in X-irradiated CHO cells studied by constant- and graded-field gel electrophoresis. , 1996, International journal of radiation biology.

[21]  C. W. Gear,et al.  Numerical initial value problem~ in ordinary differential eqttations , 1971 .

[22]  G. Moschini,et al.  DNA DSB induction and rejoining in V79 cells irradiated with light ions: a constant field gel electrophoresis study. , 2000, International journal of radiation biology.

[23]  L. Braby,et al.  Multiple components of split-dose repair in plateau-phase mammalian cells: a new challenge for phenomenological modelers. , 1990, Radiation research.

[24]  W. Dewey,et al.  Erratum: Methods for the quantification of DNA double-strand breaks determined from the distribution of DNA fragment sizes measured by pulsed- field gel electrophoresis (Radiation Research (1995) 143:1 (8-16)) , 1995 .

[25]  K. Prise,et al.  The role of higher-order chromatin structure in the yield and distribution of DNA double-strand breaks in cells irradiated with X-rays or alpha-particles. , 2000, International journal of radiation biology.

[26]  B. Rydberg,et al.  Clusters of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. II. Experimental detection. , 1996, Radiation research.

[27]  R. Mortimer,et al.  A quantitative model of DNA fragments generated by ionizing radiation, and possible experimental applications. , 1991, Radiation research.

[28]  D. T. Goodhead,et al.  Quantitative modelling of DNA damage using Monte Carlo track structure method , 1999, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[29]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[30]  J. Savage The transmission of FISH-painted patterns derived from complex chromosome exchanges. , 1995, Mutation research.

[31]  R G Dale,et al.  The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[32]  G. Kraft,et al.  The formation of radiation-induced DNA breaks: the ratio of double-strand breaks to single-strand breaks. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  C A Tobias,et al.  The repair-misrepair model in radiobiology: comparison to other models. , 1985, Radiation research. Supplement.

[34]  P. Deschavanne,et al.  A benchmark of cell survival models using survival curves for human cells after completion of repair of potentially lethal damage. , 1994, Radiation research.

[35]  J R Savage,et al.  A brief survey of aberration origin theories. , 1998, Mutation research.

[36]  M. Frankenberg-Schwager Induction, repair and biological relevance of radiation-induced DNA lesions in eukaryotic cells , 1990, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[37]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing.@@@Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. , 1994 .

[38]  R K Sachs,et al.  The link between low-LET dose-response relations and the underlying kinetics of damage production/repair/misrepair. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[39]  N. Oleinick,et al.  Nuclear and chromatin structures and their influence on the radiosensitivity of DNA , 1994 .

[40]  M. Frankenberg-Schwager,et al.  DNA double-strand breaks: their repair and relationship to cell killing in yeast. , 1990, International journal of radiation biology.

[41]  R. Hawkins,et al.  A microdosimetric-kinetic model of cell death from exposure to ionizing radiation of any LET, with experimental and clinical applications. , 1996, International journal of radiation biology.

[42]  R. Fishel,et al.  Genomic instability: first step to carcinogenesis. , 1999, Anticancer research.

[43]  P. Olive,et al.  The role of DNA single- and double-strand breaks in cell killing by ionizing radiation. , 1998, Radiation research.

[44]  J. Bedford Sublethal damage, potentially lethal damage, and chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells exposed to ionizing radiations. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[45]  Aloke Chatterjee,et al.  Clusters of DNA Damage Induced by Ionizing Radiation: Formation of Short DNA Fragments. I. Theoretical Modeling , 1996 .

[46]  G. Barendsen,et al.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[47]  P. J. Mayer,et al.  Tests of the double-strand break, lethal-potentially lethal and repair-misrepair models for mammalian cell survival using data for survival as a function of delayed-plating interval for log-phase Chinese hamster V79 cells. , 1997, Radiation research.

[48]  J. Ostashevsky Cell recovery kinetics for split-dose, multifractionated and continuous irradiation in the DSB model. , 1993, International journal of radiation biology.

[49]  H. Thames,et al.  A generalized formulation of the 'incomplete-repair' model for cell survival and tissue response to fractionated low dose-rate irradiation. , 1990, International journal of radiation biology.

[50]  W. Coleman,et al.  Multiple mechanisms account for genomic instability and molecular mutation in neoplastic transformation. , 1995, Clinical chemistry.

[51]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム(マルス)における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[52]  W. Sontag,et al.  Comparison of six different models describing survival of mammalian cells after irradiation , 1990, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[53]  C. Badie,et al.  Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks and interphase chromosome breaks after exposure to X rays in one normal and two hypersensitive human fibroblast cell lines. , 1995, Radiation research.

[54]  R. Mortimer,et al.  Analysis of DNA double strand breakage and repair using orthogonal field alternation gel electrophoresis , 1987, Yeast.

[55]  D T Goodhead Saturable repair models of radiation action in mammalian cells. , 1985, Radiation research. Supplement.

[56]  J. Ostashevsky A model relating cell survival to DNA fragment loss and unrepaired double-strand breaks. , 1989, Radiation research.

[57]  W. Dewey,et al.  Methods for the quantification of DNA double-strand breaks determined from the distribution of DNA fragment sizes measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. , 1995, Radiation research.

[58]  M. Resnick,et al.  Tying up loose ends: nonhomologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Mutation research.