All LODs are not created equal.

Article is free to read on publisher website In recent years, the development of new methodology and/or the improvement of existing methodology in gene mapping, specifically that which is targeted toward the localization of genes underlying complex disorders, have led to a proliferation of linkage analysis techniques, most of which have been implemented in user-friendly programs and have been made freely available to the genetics community. A scan through genetic epidemiological journals reveals the almost immediate embracement of these techniques; however, user interpretation regarding the statistical properties of these tests is often insubstantial and occasionally is incorrect. To assist in this interpretation, this review provides both an overview of the underlying hypotheses and an explanation of the different statistical properties of the most-popular techniques. Furthermore, accepted thresholds for genomewide significance and appropriate corrections for multiple testing are discussed.

[1]  S. Folstein,et al.  An autosomal genomic screen for autism. , 1999, American journal of medical genetics.

[2]  J. Ott,et al.  Statistical approaches to gene mapping. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  Daniel F. Gudbjartsson,et al.  Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis , 2000, Nature genetics.

[4]  S. Folstein,et al.  An autosomal genomic screen for autism. Collaborative linkage study of autism. , 1999, American journal of medical genetics.

[5]  V. Vieland,et al.  Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  N J Cox,et al.  Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  S E Hodge,et al.  Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: a simulation study. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  P. Sham Statistics in human genetics , 1997 .

[9]  A S Whittemore,et al.  Genome scanning for linkage: an overview. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  L Kruglyak,et al.  Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  N. Risch,et al.  Affected‐sib‐pair interval mapping and exclusion for complex genetic traits: Sampling considerations , 1996, Genetic epidemiology.

[12]  D. Clayton,et al.  Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[14]  J. Todd,et al.  An extension of the Maximum Lod Score method to X‐linked loci , 1995, Annals of human genetics.

[15]  E. Lander,et al.  Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  Jurg Ott,et al.  Handbook of Human Genetic Linkage , 1994 .

[17]  A. Whittemore,et al.  A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members. , 1994, Biometrics.

[18]  S A Seuchter,et al.  Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 2: Relationship between affected sib-pair tests and lod score analysis. , 1994, Human heredity.

[19]  E Feingold,et al.  Gaussian models for genetic linkage analysis using complete high-resolution maps of identity by descent. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  P. Holmans,et al.  Asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage analysis. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  J. Faraway Improved sib‐pair linkage test for disease susceptibility loci , 1993, Genetic epidemiology.

[22]  V. Vieland,et al.  Adequacy of single‐locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits , 1992, Genetic epidemiology.

[23]  N. Risch,et al.  Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  N. Risch Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[25]  N. Risch Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  D. Greenberg,et al.  Inferring mode of inheritance by comparison of lod scores. , 1989, American journal of medical genetics.

[27]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[28]  K. Lange,et al.  The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. , 1988, American journal of human genetics.

[29]  E. Lander,et al.  Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Blackwelder Wc,et al.  A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci , 1985 .

[31]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[32]  J. James,et al.  Frequency in relatives for an all‐or‐none trait , 1971, Annals of human genetics.

[33]  N. Morton Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. , 1955, American journal of human genetics.