Modal analysis of assumed-mode models of a flexible slewing beam

This paper compares the performances of different shape function-based models with respect to their ability to accurately represent the dynamic and the static behaviour of a flexible rotating beam. Several assumed-modes are compared, namely, the eigenfunctions of a rotating beam, the eigenfunctions of a clamped-payload beam, the eigenfunctions of a clamped-free beam, the polynomial functions, the cubic splines and the cubic B-splines. A systematic and detailed comparison of the eigenvalues, the eigenmodes and their derivatives and the static deformations and their derivatives is performed on a slewing beam in the vertical plane. Load parameters are changed from their nominal values to test for the sensitivity of the shape functions based models. The comparisons show that: (1) clamped-free eigenfunctions are mostly inadequate; (2) clamped-payload eigenfunctions are good candidates even when the payload parameters are changed; (3) compared to the clamped-payload eigenfunctions, the additional complexity of the rotating beam eigenfunctions does not improve the results; (4) polynomial functions are very attractive but are too sensitive to system parameters variations and (5) overall, the cubic splines using curvatures as generalised coordinates offer the best compromise between good precision and low calculation complexity.

[1]  J.-C. Piedbœuf,et al.  Estimation of endpoint position and orientation of a flexible link using strain gauges , 1994 .

[2]  Inna Sharf,et al.  Comparison and Validation of Dynamics Simulation Models for a Structurally Flexible Manipulator , 1998 .

[3]  Jean-Claude Piedboeuf Six methods to model a flexible beam rotating in the vertical plane , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[4]  Youdan Kim,et al.  Introduction to Dynamics and Control of Flexible Structures , 1993 .

[5]  Jian-Shiang Chen,et al.  Experiments on the payload-adaptation of a flexible one-link manipulation with unknown payload , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  David S. Watkins,et al.  Fundamentals of matrix computations , 1991 .

[7]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Convergence of the classical Rayleigh-Ritz method and the finite element method , 1990 .

[8]  Ouassima Akhrif,et al.  Robust noncollocated passive models of a flexible link with uncertain payload and joint inertia , 2000, ICECS 2000. 7th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.00EX445).

[9]  Wayne J. Book,et al.  A linear dynamic model for flexible robotic manipulators , 1987 .

[10]  Ashitava Ghosal,et al.  Comparison of the Assumed Modes and Finite Element Models for Flexible Multilink Manipulators , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Paolo Valigi,et al.  Dynamic modelling of a two link flexible robot experimental validation * and , 1996 .

[12]  T. R. Parks,et al.  Effect of Payload on the Dynamics of a Flexible Manipulator—Modeling for Control , 1991 .

[13]  Curtis F. Gerald,et al.  APPLIED NUMERICAL ANALYSIS , 1972, The Mathematical Gazette.

[14]  L. Meirovitch Analytical Methods in Vibrations , 1967 .

[15]  M. O. Tokhi,et al.  Finite element approach to dynamic modelling of a flexible robot manipulator: Performance evaluation and computational requirements , 1999 .

[16]  Rajnikant V. Patel,et al.  Nonlinear tip-position tracking control of a flexible-link manipulator: theory and experiments , 2001, Autom..

[17]  Jorge Angeles,et al.  On the controllability and observability of flexible beams under rigid-body motion , 1991, Proceedings IECON '91: 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation.

[18]  E. Barbieri,et al.  Unconstrained and Constrained Mode Expansions for a Flexible Slewing Link , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[19]  Two bracketing theorems characterizing the eigensolution for theh-version of the finite element method , 1983 .

[20]  Sabri Cetinkunt,et al.  Closed-Loop Behavior of a Feedback-Controlled Flexible Arm: A Comparative Study , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[21]  Wayne J. Book,et al.  Practical models for practical flexible arms , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[22]  Keith W. Buffinton,et al.  A Comparative Study of Simple Dynamic Models and Control Schemes for Elastic Manipulators , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[23]  Andrew A. Goldenberg,et al.  Dynamic modeling and mode analysis of flexible-link, flexible-joint robots , 1998 .