PEM fuel cell stack testing in the framework of an EU-harmonized fuel cell testing protocol: Results for an 11 kW stack

Abstract Fuel cell testing and standardization thematic network (FCTESTNET) was a Thematic Network funded by the European Commission under the Fifth Framework Program (FP5), which was comprised of 55 European partners. The project concluded in 2006 and the main output was the collection and compilation of agreed testing procedures for different fuel cell technologies (PEM, SOFC, MCFC), applications (stationary, portable, transport), as well as balance of plant. Experimental validation of such testing procedures is the next necessary step for obtaining reliable harmonized testing procedures. The Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Energy (IE) has started the validation process on selected PEM testing procedures. One of the FCTESTNET procedures applied at JRC-IE is the polarization curve for a PEM stack. Results show that the harmonization of some parameters, such as the acquisition and equilibrium time for each value of the current density, and the control of the stack coolant temperature, is a necessary action for an objective and trustworthy comparison of the performance data.

[1]  Ping Yu,et al.  PtCo/C cathode catalyst for improved durability in PEMFCs , 2005 .

[2]  James M. Fenton,et al.  Operation of Nafion®-based PEM fuel cells with no external humidification: influence of operating conditions and gas diffusion layers , 2004 .

[3]  Nigel M. Sammes,et al.  Fuel cell technology : reaching towards commercialization , 2006 .

[4]  David P. Wilkinson,et al.  High temperature PEM fuel cells , 2006 .

[5]  Massimo Santarelli,et al.  Experimental analysis of the effects of the operating variables on the performance of a single PEMFC , 2007 .

[6]  S. Basu Recent trends in fuel cell science and technology , 2007 .

[7]  Frano Barbir,et al.  Relationship between pressure drop and cell resistance as a diagnostic tool for PEM fuel cells , 2005 .

[8]  E. Gonzalez,et al.  Influence of the operational parameters on the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with different flow fields , 2003 .

[9]  Mark W. Davis,et al.  Proposed test methodology and performance rating standard for residential fuel cell systems , 2006 .

[10]  Ay Su,et al.  Design, fabrication and performance analysis of a 200 W PEM fuel cell short stack , 2007 .

[11]  T. Springer,et al.  Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model , 1991 .

[12]  Christoph Ziegler,et al.  Enhancing liquid water transport by laser perforation of a GDL in a PEM fuel cell , 2008 .

[13]  Jesse S. Wainright,et al.  Microfabricated fuel cells , 2003 .

[14]  Héctor D. Abruña,et al.  Fabrication and preliminary testing of a planar membraneless microchannel fuel cell , 2005 .

[15]  J. C. Amphlett,et al.  A model predicting transient responses of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 1996 .

[16]  Fabio Rinaldi,et al.  Polimeric Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells: Characterization Test Under Variable Temperature and Relative Humidity Conditions , 2007 .

[17]  Frano Barbir,et al.  PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice , 2012 .

[18]  Liyan Sun,et al.  The study on transient characteristic of proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack during dynamic loading , 2007 .

[19]  R. Holze The 80th birthday of Wolf Vielstich , 2003 .

[20]  Rongzhong Jiang,et al.  Voltage–time behavior of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack at constant current discharge , 2001 .

[21]  Shogo Watanabe,et al.  Study of fuel cell structure and heating method: Development of JARI's standard single cell , 2006 .

[22]  Christopher Hebling,et al.  A PEM fuel cell for combined measurement of current and temperature distribution, and flow field flooding , 2004 .