Emended descriptions of Prevotella denticola, Prevotella loescheii, Prevotella veroralis, and Prevotella melaninogenica.

During studies of human periodontal disease, a number of bacterial strains were encountered that, on the basis of results of standard biochemical tests, appeared to be Prevotella buccalis, Prevotella denticola, Prevotella melaninogenica, or Prevotella loescheii. However, use of the standard biochemical tests, cellular fatty acid analyses, and the polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis patterns of soluble proteins resulted in conflicting identifications of these strains. The results of tests for cellobiose fermentation, inulin fermentation, and pigment production were responsible for most of the discordant results. Cellular fatty acid analyses in which the Microbial Identification System was used did not differentiate these strains from validly described species, even though separate library entries were created for them. DNA reassociation determinations in which the S1 nuclease procedure was used showed that cellobiose fermentation and pigment production are variable among strains of P. melaninogenica and P. denticola and that fermentation of xylan is not a reliable characteristic for differentiating P. buccalis from Prevotella veroralis. In contrast to previous indications, most strains of P. veroralis do not ferment xylan. These species can be differentiated by DNA-DNA reassociation and by cellular fatty acid analysis, using the Microbial Identification System, but differentiation by currently described phenotypic characteristics is not reliable. Similarly, P. loescheii and the genetically distinct (but closely related) D1C-20 group cannot be distinguished reliably from each other or from P. veroralis, P. denticola, and P. melaninogenica on the basis of currently described phenotypic tests other than cellular fatty acid composition or, for some species, electrophoretic patterns of soluble whole-cell proteins.

[1]  W. Moore,et al.  Comparative bacteriology of juvenile periodontitis , 1985, Infection and immunity.

[2]  R. Jorgensen,et al.  Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  John L. Johnson,et al.  Description of Bacteroides loescheii sp. nov. and Emendation of the Descriptions of Bacteroides melaninogenicus (Oliver and Wherry) Roy and Kelly 1939 and Bacteroides denticola Shah and Collins 1981 , 1982 .

[4]  M. Collins,et al.  Bacteroides buccalis, sp. nov., Bacteroides denticola, sp. nov., and Bacteroides pentosaceus, sp. nov., new species of the genus Bacteroides from the oral cavity , 1981 .

[5]  W. Moore,et al.  Polyacrylamide Slab Gel Electrophoresis of Soluble Proteins for Studies of Bacterial Floras , 1980, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[6]  P Berg,et al.  Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  T. Thiel,et al.  Modified Broth-Disk Method for Testing the Antibiotic Susceptibility of Anaerobic Bacteria , 1973, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[8]  J. Johnson,et al.  Taxonomy of the Clostridia: Wall Composition and DNA Homologies in Clostridium butyricum and Other Butyric Acid-producing Clostridia , 1971 .

[9]  John L. Johnson 2 DNA Reassociation and RNA Hybridisation of Bacterial Nucleic Acids , 1985 .

[10]  Y. Benno,et al.  Taxonomic Study of Bacteroides oralis and Related Organisms and Proposal of Bacteroides veroralis sp. nov. , 1983 .

[11]  Lillian V. Holdeman,et al.  Anaerobe Laboratory manual , 1977 .

[12]  J. H. Parish Principles and practice of experiments with nucleic acids , 1972 .