Prediction of Human Femoral Bone Strength Using Ultrasound Velocity and BMD: An In Vitro Study

Abstract: The stiffness and strength of cancellous bone are important in the management of skeletal diseases such as osteoporosis. These properties are a function not only of bone density but also of bone architecture, some measure of which can be provided by quantitative ultrasound. The ability of quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density (BMD) to predict stiffness and strength of human femoral heads removed from live subjects during hip replacement was assessed. Stiffness and strength were measured using a uniaxial compression test. Ultrasound velocity was measured using the pulse-submersion technique (McClue CUBAResearch) and BMD using DXA (Lunar DPX-L). Ultrasound velocity (quantitative ultrasound) and stiffness varied with the three orthogonal directions, the highest significance being between the proximo-distal (PD) and antero-posterior (AP) directions (p < 0.0001) for stiffness and p = 0.0003 for velocity). Ultrasound velocity was significantly correlated with compressive bone strength (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001) and stiffness (r = 0.79–0.83, p < 0.0001). BMD was also significantly correlated with compressive strength (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) and stiffness (r = 0.66–0.81, p < 0.001). Using multiple regression analysis both BMD and velocity were significant predictors of strength (r = 0.88, p = 0.0004 and 0.0054 respectively) and stiffness r = 0.92, p = 0.0001 and 0.0003 respectively). BMD and velocity were still independent significant predictors of both stiffness (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001 and 0.0001 respectively) and strength (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001 and 0.02) when they combined as a product (BMDn*Vm). This suggests that BMD measured using DXA, if used in conjunction with ultrasound velocity, may be able to improve osteoporosis risk assessment. The information about femur anisotropy may also be important for hip prosthesis and in vivo modelling.

[1]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  A M Schott,et al.  Ultrasonic assessment of bone: a review. , 1993, The European journal of medicine.

[3]  G. Breart,et al.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.

[4]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  C H Turner,et al.  Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. , 1993, Bone.

[6]  T A Einhorn,et al.  Ultrasound assessment of bone. , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Ultrasound velocity and attenuation at different skeletal sites compared with bone mineral density measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  R Van Audekercke,et al.  The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  K. Singer,et al.  Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength: correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region. , 1995, Bone.

[12]  J Dequeker,et al.  Inverse relationship osteoarthritis-osteoporosis: what is the evidence? What are the consequences? , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[13]  C M Langton,et al.  A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone. , 1990, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[14]  P. Armitage,et al.  Statistical methods in medical research. , 1972 .

[15]  John B. Selby,et al.  The Evaluation of Osteoporosis: Dual Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry in Clinical Practice By Heinz W. Wahner, Ignac Fogelman, Martin Dunitz, Ltd, London, 1994 , 1994 .

[16]  Thomas A. Einhorn,et al.  Perspectives: Ultrasound assessment of bone , 1993 .

[17]  H. Wahner,et al.  The evaluation of osteoporosis : dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice , 1994 .

[18]  C F Njeh,et al.  Orthogonal relationships between ultrasonic velocity and material properties of bovine cancellous bone. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  J. A. Evans,et al.  The effect of bone structure on ultrasonic attenuation and velocity. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[20]  C. Njeh The dependence of ultrasound velocity and attenuation on the material properties of cancellous bone. , 1995 .

[21]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  C C Glüer,et al.  Osteoporosis: association of recent fractures with quantitative US findings. , 1996, Radiology.

[24]  P. Nicholson,et al.  The dependence of ultrasonic properties on orientation in human vertebral bone. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  H K Genant,et al.  Osteoporosis. Current techniques and recent developments in quantitative bone densitometry. , 1991, Radiologic clinics of North America.