Using local transition probability models in Markov random fields for forest change detection

Change detection based on the comparison of independently classified images (i.e. post-classification comparison) is well-known to be negatively affected by classification errors of individual maps. Incorporating spatial-temporal contextual information in the classification helps to reduce the classification errors, thus improving change detection results. In this paper, spatial-temporal Markov Random Fields (MRF) models were used to integrate spatial-temporal information with spectral information for multi-temporal classification in an attempt to mitigate the impacts of classification errors on change detection. One important component in spatial-temporal MRF models is the specification of transition probabilities. Traditionally, a global transition probability model is used that assumes spatial stationarity of transition probabilities across an image scene, which may be invalid if areas have varying transition probabilities. By relaxing the stationarity assumption, we developed two local transition probability models to make the transition model locally adaptive to spatially varying transition probabilities. The first model called locally adjusted global transition model adapts to the local variation by multiplying a pixel-wise probability of change with the global transition model. The second model called pixel-wise transition model was developed as a fully local model based on the estimation of the pixel-wise joint probabilities. When applied to the forest change detection in Paraguay, the two local models showed significant improvements in the accuracy of identifying the change from forest to non-forest compared with traditional models. This indicates that the local transition probability models can present temporal information more accurately in change detection algorithms based on spatial-temporal classification of multi-temporal images. The comparison between the two local transition models showed that the fully local model better captured the spatial heterogeneity of the transition probabilities and achieved more stable and consistent results over different regions of a large image scene.

[1]  J. Thirgood Global deforestation and the nineteenth-century world economy , 1985, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[2]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  A spatial–temporal approach to monitoring forest disease spread using multi-temporal high spatial resolution imagery , 2006 .

[3]  E. Leigh,et al.  Tropical forest remnants: Edited by W.F. Laurance and R.O. Bieiregaard, Jr University of Chicago Press, 1997. £83.95/$ 105.00 hbk, £30.50/$38.00 pbk (632 pages) ISBN 0 226 46898 4 / 0 226 46899 2 , 1997 .

[4]  Mark S. Kaiser,et al.  Markov Random Field Models , 2014 .

[5]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities ED. W.F LAURANCE AND R.O. BIERREGAARD, JR 616 pp., ISBN 0 226 46898 4 US$105.00/£83.95 (cloth); 0 226 46899 2 US$38.00/£30.50 (paper), Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1997 , 1998, Environmental Conservation.

[6]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification of multisource and hyperspectral data based on decision fusion , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  J. Townshend,et al.  Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Hotspots: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions , 2000 .

[9]  J. Townshend,et al.  Rapid loss of Paraguay's Atlantic forest and the status of protected areas — A Landsat assessment , 2007 .

[10]  B. Xu,et al.  Remote Sensing of Forests Over Time , 2003 .

[11]  E. Dinerstein,et al.  The Global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation , 2002 .

[12]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[13]  T. Brooks,et al.  Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions , 2000 .

[14]  S. Franklin,et al.  Remote sensing of forest environments : concepts and case studies , 2003 .

[15]  Sebastiano B. Serpico,et al.  A Markov random field approach to spatio-temporal contextual image classification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  N. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[17]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems , 1994, Science.

[18]  Anthony C. Janetos,et al.  Global Effects of Tropical Deforestation: Towards an Integrated Perspective , 1990, Environmental Conservation.

[19]  Stan Z. Li Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis , 2009, Advances in Pattern Recognition.

[20]  D. Lu,et al.  Change detection techniques , 2004 .

[21]  Peng Gong,et al.  Registration-noise reduction in difference images for change detection , 1992 .

[22]  Michael Williams,et al.  Deforestation: past and present , 1989 .

[23]  J. V. Soares,et al.  Characterizing landscape changes in central Rondonia using Landsat TM imagery , 1999 .

[24]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[25]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Effects of tropical deforestation on global and regional atmospheric chemistry , 1991 .

[26]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The Future of Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[27]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities , 1998 .

[28]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Amazonian deforestation and global warming: carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil's Amazon forest , 1996 .

[29]  Xavier Pons,et al.  Post-classification change detection with data from different sensors: Some accuracy considerations , 2003 .

[30]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[31]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Classification of multisource remote sensing imagery using a genetic algorithm and Markov random fields , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[32]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Spatial modelling of deforestation in southern Cameroon - Spatial disaggregation of diverse deforestation processes , 1997 .

[33]  Richard A. Houghton,et al.  Tropical deforestation and atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1991 .

[34]  A. Chiarello,et al.  Effects of fragmentation of the Atlantic forest on mammal communities in south-eastern Brazil , 1999 .

[35]  R. Colwell Remote sensing of the environment , 1980, Nature.

[36]  N. Myers Threatened biotas: "Hot spots" in tropical forests , 1988, The Environmentalist.

[37]  Compton J. Tucker,et al.  Tropical deforestation in the Bolivian Amazon , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[38]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Random field models in image analysis , 1989 .

[39]  J. F. Richards,et al.  Global Deforestation and the Nineteenth-Century World Economy. , 1984 .

[40]  William F. Laurance,et al.  RAIN FOREST FRAGMENTATION AND THE DYNAMICS OF AMAZONIAN TREE COMMUNITIES , 1998 .

[41]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Biomass Collapse in Amazonian Forest Fragments , 1997 .

[42]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[43]  Christopher Justice,et al.  The impact of misregistration on change detection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[44]  R. DeFries,et al.  Detecting Long-term Global Forest Change Using Continuous Fields of Tree-Cover Maps from 8-km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) Data for the Years 1982–99 , 2004, Ecosystems.

[45]  C. Tucker,et al.  Tropical Deforestation and Habitat Fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite Data from 1978 to 1988 , 1993, Science.

[46]  D. Liu,et al.  Classifying multi-temporal TM imagery using Markov random fields and support vector machines , 2005, International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, 2005..