PEDOT:PSS‐Free Polymer Non‐Fullerene Polymer Solar Cells with Efficiency up to 18.60% Employing a Binary‐Solvent‐Chlorinated ITO Anode

Despite the tremendous development of different high‐performing photovoltaic systems in non‐fullerene polymer solar cells (PSCs), improving their performance is still highly demanding. Herein, an effective and compatible strategy, i.e., binary‐solvent‐chlorinated indium tin oxide (ITO) anode, is presented to improve the device performance of the state‐of‐the‐art photoactive systems. Although both ODCB (1,2‐dichlorobenzene) solvent‐ and ODCB:H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) co‐solvent‐chlorinated ITO (ITO‐Cl‐ODCB and ITO‐Cl‐ODCB:H2O2) show similar optical transmittance, electrical conductivities, and work function values, ITO‐Cl‐ODCB:H2O2 exhibits higher Cl surface coverage and more suitable surface free energy close to the poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS)‐buffered ITO anode (ITO/PEDOT:PSS). As a direct consequence, the performance of ITO‐Cl‐ODCB‐based PBDB‐T‐2F:BTP‐eC9:PC71BM PSCs is comparable as the bare ITO‐based devices. In contrast, the performance of ITO‐Cl‐ODCB:H2O2‐based devices with both small and the scaled‐up areas significantly surpass the ITO/PEDOT:PSS‐based devices. Furthermore, detailed experimental studies are conducted linking optical property, blend morphology, and physical dynamics to find the reasons for the performance difference. By applying the ITO‐Cl‐ODCB:H2O2 anode to six other photovoltaic systems, the device efficiencies are enhanced by 3.6–6.2% relative to those of the ITO/PEDOT:PSS‐based control devices, which validates its great application potential of co‐solvent‐modified ITO anode employed into PEDOT:PSS‐free PSCs.

[1]  S. Luzzati,et al.  Interlayers for non-fullerene based polymer solar cells: distinctive features and challenges , 2021 .

[2]  K. Leo,et al.  Organic Solar Cells—The Path to Commercial Success , 2020, Advanced Energy Materials.

[3]  Y. Zou,et al.  Emerging Approaches in Enhancing the Efficiency and Stability in Non‐Fullerene Organic Solar Cells , 2020, Advanced Energy Materials.

[4]  Shinuk Cho,et al.  17% Non‐Fullerene Organic Solar Cells with Annealing‐Free Aqueous MoOx , 2020, Advanced science.

[5]  Rawad K. Hallani,et al.  Self-Assembled Monolayer Enables Hole Transport Layer-Free Organic Solar Cells with 18% Efficiency and Improved Operational Stability , 2020 .

[6]  Q. Zheng,et al.  Ladder-Type Heteroheptacenes with Different Heterocycles for Nonfullerene Acceptors. , 2020, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  Eui-Tae Kim,et al.  Synthesis and organic solar cell application of RNA-nucleobase-complexed CdS nanowires , 2020 .

[8]  Yiwang Chen,et al.  Hole transport layers for organic solar cells: recent progress and prospects , 2020 .

[9]  K. Sun,et al.  Molecular Lock Induced by Chloroplatinic Acid Doping of PEDOT:PSS for High-Performance Organic Photovoltaics. , 2020, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[10]  Rui Wang,et al.  Cathode engineering with perylene-diimide interlayer enabling over 17% efficiency single-junction organic solar cells , 2020, Nature Communications.

[11]  Zhicai He,et al.  Dopamine Semiquinone Radical Doped PEDOT:PSS: Enhanced Conductivity, Work Function and Performance in Organic Solar Cells , 2020, Advanced Energy Materials.

[12]  Yang Yang,et al.  Narrowing the Band Gap: The Key to High-Performance Organic Photovoltaics. , 2020, Accounts of chemical research.

[13]  Fei Huang,et al.  Solution‐Processed Polymer Solar Cells with over 17% Efficiency Enabled by an Iridium Complexation Approach , 2020, Advanced Energy Materials.

[14]  Jianqi Zhang,et al.  Single‐Junction Organic Photovoltaic Cells with Approaching 18% Efficiency , 2020, Advanced materials.

[15]  Congxia Xie,et al.  Flexible All‐Solution‐Processed Organic Solar Cells with High‐Performance Nonfullerene Active Layers , 2020, Advanced materials.

[16]  Yongfang Li,et al.  A Layer-by-Layer Architecture for Printable Organic Solar Cells Overcoming the Scaling Lag of Module Efficiency , 2020, Joule.

[17]  Yong Cao,et al.  Interface-enhanced organic solar cells with extrapolated T80 lifetimes of over 20 years. , 2020, Science bulletin.

[18]  Shangfeng Yang,et al.  18% Efficiency organic solar cells. , 2020, Science bulletin.

[19]  Yongfang Li,et al.  Solution-processable n-doped graphene-containing cathode interfacial materials for high-performance organic solar cells , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[20]  C. Brabec,et al.  A multi-objective optimization-based layer-by-layer blade-coating approach for organic solar cells: rational control of vertical stratification for high performance , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[21]  T. Anthopoulos,et al.  17% Efficient Organic Solar Cells Based on Liquid Exfoliated WS2 as a Replacement for PEDOT:PSS , 2019, Advanced materials.

[22]  D. Deng,et al.  Spontaneous open-circuit voltage gain of fully fabricated organic solar cells caused by elimination of interfacial energy disorder , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[23]  Yong Cui,et al.  Improved Charge Transport and Reduced Nonradiative Energy Loss Enable Over 16% Efficiency in Ternary Polymer Solar Cells , 2019, Advanced materials.

[24]  Jacek Ulanski,et al.  Single-Junction Organic Solar Cell with over 15% Efficiency Using Fused-Ring Acceptor with Electron-Deficient Core , 2019, Joule.

[25]  Krishna Feron,et al.  The role of surface energy control in organic photovoltaics based on solar paints , 2019, Journal of Materials Chemistry A.

[26]  Huiqiong Zhou,et al.  Regulating Bulk‐Heterojunction Molecular Orientations through Surface Free Energy Control of Hole‐Transporting Layers for High‐Performance Organic Solar Cells , 2019, Advanced materials.

[27]  F. Huang,et al.  High-performance inverted polymer solar cells without an electron extraction layer via a one-step coating of cathode buffer and active layer , 2019, Journal of Materials Chemistry A.

[28]  H. Ade,et al.  A Printable Organic Cathode Interlayer Enables over 13% Efficiency for 1-cm2 Organic Solar Cells , 2019, Joule.

[29]  H. Yao,et al.  A Self‐Organized Poly(vinylpyrrolidone)‐Based Cathode Interlayer in Inverted Fullerene‐Free Organic Solar Cells , 2018, Advanced materials.

[30]  Jie Min,et al.  A Cost Analysis of Fully Solution‐Processed ITO‐Free Organic Solar Modules , 2018, Advanced Energy Materials.

[31]  Wenjun Zhang,et al.  Small Molecule Interlayers in Organic Solar Cells , 2018 .

[32]  Jianhui Hou,et al.  Solution‐Processable Conjugated Polymers as Anode Interfacial Layer Materials for Organic Solar Cells , 2018 .

[33]  Yongfang Li,et al.  Flexible and Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells , 2018 .

[34]  Alex K.-Y. Jen,et al.  Recent progress and perspective in solution-processed Interfacial materials for efficient and stable polymer and organometal perovskite solar cells , 2015 .

[35]  Zhan'ao Tan,et al.  Solution-processable metal oxides/chelates as electrode buffer layers for efficient and stable polymer solar cells , 2015 .

[36]  Huiqiong Zhou,et al.  Polymer Homo‐Tandem Solar Cells with Best Efficiency of 11.3% , 2015, Advanced materials.

[37]  A. Heeger,et al.  An Organic Surface Modifier to Produce a High Work Function Transparent Electrode for High Performance Polymer Solar Cells , 2015, Advanced materials.

[38]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Interface Design to Improve the Performance and Stability of Solution‐Processed Small‐Molecule Conventional Solar Cells , 2014 .

[39]  Boyuan Qi,et al.  Perylene diimides: a thickness-insensitive cathode interlayer for high performance polymer solar cells , 2014 .

[40]  A. Heeger,et al.  Conductive Conjugated Polyelectrolyte as Hole‐Transporting Layer for Organic Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells , 2014, Advanced materials.

[41]  A. Heeger,et al.  Facile doping of anionic narrow-band-gap conjugated polyelectrolytes during dialysis. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[42]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  A combination of Al-doped ZnO and a conjugated polyelectrolyte interlayer for small molecule solution-processed solar cells with an inverted structure , 2013 .

[43]  Zhenghong Lu,et al.  The origin of the high work function of chlorinated indium tin oxide , 2013 .

[44]  A. Heeger,et al.  High‐Efficiency Polymer Solar Cells Enhanced by Solvent Treatment , 2013, Advanced materials.

[45]  K. Wong,et al.  Enhanced performance in polymer solar cells by the use of a halogenated indium tin oxide anode , 2013 .

[46]  Fei Huang,et al.  Inverted polymer solar cells with 8.4% efficiency by conjugated polyelectrolyte , 2012 .

[47]  K. Sun,et al.  Polymer solar cells using chlorinated indium tin oxide electrodes with high work function as the anode , 2012 .

[48]  H. Ohkita,et al.  Selective Dye Loading at the Heterojunction in Polymer/Fullerene Solar Cells , 2011 .

[49]  S. T. Lee,et al.  Enhanced performance in polymer photovoltaic cells with chloroform treated indium tin oxide anode modification , 2011 .

[50]  Zhuozhi Wang,et al.  Chlorinated Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes with High Work Function for Organic Device Compatibility , 2011, Science.

[51]  A. Heeger,et al.  Improved high-efficiency organic solar cells via incorporation of a conjugated polyelectrolyte interlayer. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[52]  Hongbin Wu,et al.  High-efficiency, environment-friendly electroluminescent polymers with stable high work function metal as a cathode: green- and yellow-emitting conjugated polyfluorene polyelectrolytes and their neutral precursors. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[53]  L. S. Roman,et al.  Modeling photocurrent action spectra of photovoltaic devices based on organic thin films , 1999 .

[54]  D. K. Owens,et al.  Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers , 1969 .