A network meta-analysis of everolimus plus exemestane versus chemotherapy in the first- and second-line treatment of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy to exemestane plus everolimus (EXE/EVE) through a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials. NMA methods extend standard pairwise meta-analysis to allow simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments while maintaining randomization of individual studies. The method enables “direct” evidence (i.e., evidence from studies directly comparing two interventions) and “indirect” evidence (i.e., evidence from studies that do not compare the two interventions directly) to be pooled under the assumption of evidence consistency. We used NMA to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) curves in 34 studies, and response rate (RR) and the hazard ratios (HRs) of the PFS/TTP in 36 studies. A number needed to treat (NNT) analysis was also performed as well as descriptive comparison of reported toxicities. The NMA for PFS/TTP curves and for HR shows EXE/EVE is more efficacious than capecitabine plus sunitinib, CMF, megestrol acetate and tamoxifen, with an average of related-PFS/TTP difference ranging from about 10 months for capecitabine plus sunitinib to more than 6 months for tamoxifen. The NMA for overall RR shows that EXE/EVE provides a better RR than bevacizumab plus capecitabine, capecitabine, capecitabine plus sorafenib, capecitabine plus sunitinib, CMF, gemcitabine plus epirubicin plus paclitaxel, EVE plus tamoxifen, EXE, FEC, megestrol acetate, mitoxantrone, and tamoxifen. Finally, the NMA for NNT shows that EXE/EVE is more beneficial as compared to BMF, capecitabine, capecitabine plus sunitinib, CMF, FEC, megestrol acetate, mitoxantrone, and tamoxifen. The combination of EXE/EVE as first- or second-line therapy for ER+ve/HER2−ve metastatic breast cancer is more efficacious than several chemotherapy regimens that were reported in the literature. Toxicities also favored EXE/EVE in most instances.

[1]  Shaohua Zhang,et al.  Single-agent capecitabine maintenance therapy after response to capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer , 2012, Anti-cancer drugs.

[2]  D. Amadori,et al.  A randomized, phase II, three-arm study of two schedules of ixabepilone or paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  F. Cardoso,et al.  A review of the treatment of endocrine responsive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women. , 2013, Cancer treatment reviews.

[4]  M. Piccart,et al.  Phase III study comparing exemestane with tamoxifen as first-line hormonal treatment of metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  N. Tinari,et al.  Meta-analysis of phase III trials of docetaxel alone or in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer , 2011, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Thomas Bachelot,et al.  Comparative efficacy of everolimus plus exemestane versus fulvestrant for hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer following progression/recurrence after endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  M. Piccart,et al.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  I. Ray-Coquard,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: a GINECO study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B. Overmoyer,et al.  Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  The impact of incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis in cost-effectiveness analysis - a case study of pharmacotherapies for moderate to severe COPD , 2014, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.

[12]  M. Namer,et al.  Docetaxel vs 5-fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline therapy failure , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  C. Criscitiello,et al.  Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  N. Robert,et al.  Sunitinib plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label trial. , 2011, Clinical Breast Cancer.

[15]  G. Chahine,et al.  A phase II randomized study comparing navelbine and capecitabine (Navcap) followed either by Navcap or by weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of HER-2/neu negative metastatic breast cancer , 2011, Medical oncology.

[16]  W. Gradishar,et al.  Phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: final analysis of overall survival. , 2012, Clinical breast cancer.

[17]  M. Piccart,et al.  Everolimus Plus Exemestane in Postmenopausal Patients with HR+ Breast Cancer: BOLERO-2 Final Progression-Free Survival Analysis , 2013, Advances in Therapy.

[18]  M. Beckmann,et al.  Capecitabine plus paclitaxel versus epirubicin plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial by the AGO Breast Cancer Study Group , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[19]  D. Doval,et al.  Maintenance capecitabine and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone after initial first-line bevacizumab and docetaxel for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (IMELDA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[20]  P. Fasching,et al.  Phase III trial of sunitinib in combination with capecitabine versus capecitabine monotherapy for the treatment of patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  L. Dirix,et al.  Exemestane is superior to megestrol acetate after tamoxifen failure in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized double-blind trial. The Exemestane Study Group. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  W. Gradishar,et al.  nab-Paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer and poor prognostic factors: a retrospective analysis , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  R. Souchon,et al.  Is first-line single-agent mitoxantrone in the treatment of high-risk metastatic breast cancer patients as effective as combination chemotherapy? No difference in survival but higher quality of life were found in a multicenter randomized trial. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[24]  R. Souchon,et al.  Bendamustine prolongs progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): a phase III prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of bendamustine hydrochloride, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (BMF) versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as first-line treatment of MBC , 2005, Anti-cancer drugs.

[25]  H. Xu,et al.  A literature-based meta-analysis taxane-based doublet versus single-agent taxane chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer , 2011, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[26]  G. Jerusalem,et al.  The association of chemotherapy versus hormonal therapy and health outcomes among patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2−negative metastatic breast cancer: experience from the patient perspective , 2014, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[27]  Mauro D'Amico,et al.  Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  J. Mackey,et al.  Motesanib, or open-label bevacizumab, in combination with paclitaxel, as first-line treatment for HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Paclitaxel and epirubicin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  T. Fojo,et al.  Progression-Free Survival Is Simply a Measure of a Drug’s Effect While Administered and Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival , 2009, Cancer journal.

[31]  B. Ljung,et al.  Breast cancer version 3.2014. , 2014, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[32]  Eld,et al.  ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2) , 2014, Breast.

[33]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  D. Osoba,et al.  Phase III comparative study of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in disseminated metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA8. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  K. Thorlund,et al.  Network vs. Pairwise Meta-Analyses: A Case Study of the Impact of an Evidence-Synthesis Paradigm on Value of Information Outcomes , 2014, PharmacoEconomics.

[36]  J. Cueva,et al.  Novel therapeutic approaches to the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Cancer treatment reviews.

[37]  J. Klijn,et al.  Paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Study with cross-over. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  M. Piccart,et al.  ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)† , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[39]  I. Láng,et al.  Vandetanib with docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase II study , 2012, Investigational New Drugs.

[40]  C. Russell,et al.  Treatment effect of capecitabine and docetaxel or docetaxel alone by oestrogen receptor status in patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of an exploratory analysis. , 2013, Breast.

[41]  J. Haybittle,et al.  A randomised trial of second-line hormone vs single agent chemotherapy in tamoxifen resistant advanced breast cancer. , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[42]  P. Neven,et al.  Health‐related quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with everolimus plus exemestane versus placebo plus exemestane in the phase 3, randomized, controlled, BOLERO‐2 trial , 2013, Cancer.

[43]  W. Gradishar,et al.  Significantly longer progression-free survival with nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  S. Ackland,et al.  Dose-intensive epirubicin-based chemotherapy is superior to an intensive intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimen in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized multinational study. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  M. Piccart,et al.  Effect of visceral metastases on the efficacy and safety of everolimus in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: subgroup analysis from the BOLERO-2 study. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[46]  J. Jansen,et al.  A process for assessing the feasibility of a network meta-analysis: a case study of everolimus in combination with hormonal therapy versus chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer , 2014, BMC Medicine.

[47]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  A phase II randomized crossover study of liposomal doxorubicin versus weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. , 2009, Clinical breast cancer.

[48]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[49]  M. Inbar,et al.  Gemcitabine, epirubicin, and paclitaxel versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a Central European Cooperative Oncology Group International, multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  M. Campone,et al.  A Three‐Arm Randomized Phase II Study of Oral Vinorelbine Plus Capecitabine Versus Oral Vinorelbine and Capecitabine in Sequence Versus Docetaxel Plus Capecitabine in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Anthracyclines , 2013, The breast journal.

[51]  E. Perez,et al.  RIBBON-2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  C. Obasaju,et al.  A randomized phase II study of paclitaxel and bevacizumab with and without gemcitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, Clinical breast cancer.

[53]  V. Georgoulias,et al.  Bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[54]  S. Culine,et al.  Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[55]  I. Ray-Coquard,et al.  Final Results of ERASME-4: A Randomized Trial of First-Line Docetaxel plus either Capecitabine or Epirubicin for Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2011, Oncology.

[56]  David Miles,et al.  Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[57]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Weekly Docetaxel with or without Gemcitabine as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Paclitaxel-Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Study Conducted by the Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group , 2009, Oncology.

[58]  Arlene Chan,et al.  Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION IN THE 1990 S : A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[60]  P. Ellis,et al.  Anti-tumor activity of capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: findings from the EORTC 10001 randomized phase II trial. , 2008, Breast.

[61]  M. Fernö,et al.  Individually tailored treatment with epirubicin and paclitaxel with or without capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized multicenter trial , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[62]  W. Gradishar,et al.  A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study evaluating sorafenib in combination with paclitaxel as a first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[63]  E. Bluhmki,et al.  A statistical model for the dependence between progression‐free survival and overall survival , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[64]  Yang Yao,et al.  Paclitaxel-based versus docetaxel-based regimens in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2012, Current medical research and opinion.

[65]  E. Winer,et al.  International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the European School of Oncology (ESO)-MBC Task Force: Surveillance, staging, and evaluation of patients with early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. , 2013, Breast.

[66]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Phase III study of gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with capecitabine plus docetaxel for anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[67]  M. Espié,et al.  Sorafenib in combination with capecitabine: an oral regimen for patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[68]  R. Greil,et al.  First-line treatment of advanced breast cancer with sunitinib in combination with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone: results of a prospective, randomized phase III study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[69]  L. Vahdat,et al.  Treatment of metastatic breast cancer: second line and beyond. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[70]  A. Howell,et al.  Phase III trial of epirubicin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute trial AB01. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[71]  Xian Zhou,et al.  RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[72]  Allen S Melemed,et al.  Gemcitabine plus Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[73]  P. Neven,et al.  Disease management patterns for postmenopausal women in Europe with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative advanced breast cancer , 2014, Current medical research and opinion.

[74]  Val Gebski,et al.  Capecitabine versus classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[75]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  A randomized phase III study comparing three anthracycline-free taxane-based regimens, as first line chemotherapy, in metastatic breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[76]  Joseph C Cappelleri,et al.  Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[77]  J. Ingle Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: balancing benefit and toxicity from aromatase inhibitors. , 2013, Breast.

[78]  M. Aapro,et al.  Magnitude of risks and benefits of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients: Meta-regression analysis of randomized trials , 2011, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[79]  R. Rosso,et al.  Accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[80]  L. Mariani,et al.  A Multicenter Phase II Randomized Trial of Docetaxel/Gemcitabine versus Docetaxel/Capecitabine as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Breast Cancer: A Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale Study , 2011, Oncology.

[81]  P. Neven,et al.  Health-related quality of life and disease symptoms in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer treated with everolimus plus exemestane versus exemestane monotherapy , 2013, Current medical research and opinion.

[82]  David C Hoaglin,et al.  Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[83]  H. Burger,et al.  Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[84]  D. Forman,et al.  Travel time to hospital and treatment for breast, colon, rectum, lung, ovary and prostate cancer. , 2008, European journal of cancer.