The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty.

Intramedullary instrumentation for femoral component alignment during total knee arthroplasty is readily used. Newer alignment techniques using computer navigation are now available. This study assesses the difference in the sagittal and coronal plane alignments using a cadaveric model with 3 different entry points for intramedullary alignment compared with a navigation system. Seven cadaveric limb's results show that the anterior starting point resulted in recurvatum (-2.2 degrees +/- 1.4 degrees ), the middle starting point resulted in 1.9 degrees +/- 2.2 degrees of flexion, and the posterior starting point in 3.8 degrees +/- 2.6 degrees of flexion compared with the calculated femoral axis by the computer navigation system. When comparing the valgus angle, no statistical difference between any methods resulted (average 5.2 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees valgus). The anterior and posterior starting points were significantly different in the sagittal plane. These data suggest that alignment can be significantly affected by the starting point chosen for intramedullary instrumentation.

[1]  J. Gollish,et al.  The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  D. Hungerford,et al.  Intramedullary goniometer can improve alignment in knee arthroplasty surgery. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Potential errors in axial alignment using intramedullary instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  Jos Vander Sloten,et al.  How Correctly Does an Intramedullary Rod Represent the Longitudinal Tibial Axes? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  W. Yau,et al.  Unusual complication associated with femoral intramedullary alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  M. Ritter,et al.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  S. Harwin,et al.  Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  P. Lotke,et al.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  M. Ritter,et al.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary femoral alignment systems in total knee replacement. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J O Galante,et al.  Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J. Moreland Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  L. A. Rauscher,et al.  Intramedullary Pressure and Pulmonary Function During Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.