Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parametric Maps to Evaluate Intratumoral Vascularization

ObjectivesThe purposes of this study were to assess the reliability of parametric maps from dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) to reflect the heterogeneous distribution of intratumoral vascularization and to predict the tissue features linked to vasculature. This study was designed to compare DCE-US parametric maps with histologic vascularity measurements. Materials and MethodsDynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed on 17 melanoma-bearing nude mice after a 0.1-mL bolus injection of SonoVue (Bracco SPA, Milan, Italy). The parametric maps were developed from raw linear data to extract pixelwise 2 semiquantitative parameters related to perfusion and blood volume, namely, area under the curve (AUC) and peak intensity (PI). The mathematical method to fit the time-intensity curve for each pixel was a polynomial model used in clinical routine and patented by the team. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on DCE-US parametric maps for whole tumors and for several local areas of 15 mm2 within each tumor (iROI), the latter reflecting the heterogeneity of intratumoral blood volume. As the criterion standard correlation, microvessel densities (MVDs) were determined for both ROI categories. In detail, for all iROI of 15 mm2, MVD and maturity were divided separately for vessels of 0 to 10 &mgr;m, 10 to 40 &mgr;m, and greater than 40 &mgr;m in diameter, and the results were correlated with the ultrasound findings. ResultsAmong the 17 studied mice, a total of 64 iROIs were analyzed. For the whole-tumor ROI set, AUC and PI values significantly correlated with MVD (rAUC = 0.52 [P = 0.0408] and rPI = 0.70 [P = 0.0026]). In the case of multiple iROI, a strong linear correlation was observed between the DCE-US parameters and the density of vessels ranging in their diameter from 0 to 10 &mgr;m (rAUC = 0.68 [P < 0.0001]; rPI = 0.63 [P < 0.0001]), 10 to 40 &mgr;m (rAUC = 0.98 [P = 0.0003]; rPI = 0.98 [P = 0.0004]), and greater than 40 &mgr;m (rAUC = 0.86 [P = 0.0120]; rPI = 0.92 [P = 0.0034]), respectively. However, the DCE-US parameter values of perfusion and blood volume were not significantly different according to the diameters (AUC: P = 0.1731; PI: P = 0.2918) and maturity of blood vessels. ConclusionsParametric maps of DCE-US can be reliably established from raw linear data and reflect the heterogeneous histological measures of vascularization within tumors. In contrast, the values of DCE-US parametric maps (AUC, PI) do not allow deduction of heterogeneous tissue features such as the diameters and maturity of vascular networks.

[1]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Comparing contrast-enhanced color flow imaging and pathological measures of breast lesion vascularity. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[3]  F. Han,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonic parametric perfusion imaging in the evaluation of antiangiogenic tumor treatment. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[4]  J. Gore,et al.  Correlation Between Estimates of Tumor Perfusion From Microbubble Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography and Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  P. Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound assessment of angiogenesis in a matrigel model in rats. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Linda Chami,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) and anti-angiogenic treatments. , 2011, Discovery medicine.

[7]  James M Provenzale,et al.  Imaging of angiogenesis: clinical techniques and novel imaging methods. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  James H Thrall,et al.  Imaging angiogenesis: applications and potential for drug development. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of changes in tumor biology with treatment. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[10]  N. Weidner Chapter 14. Measuring intratumoral microvessel density. , 2008, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  Nathalie Lassau,et al.  Standardization of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Antiangiogenic Therapies: The French Multicenter Support for Innovative and Expensive Techniques Study , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[12]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  Current status and guidelines for the assessment of tumour vascular support with dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography , 2012, European Radiology.

[13]  W J Niessen,et al.  Heterogeneity in DCE-MRI parametric maps: a biomarker for treatment response? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Aurore Bleuzen,et al.  Non-invasive quantification of tumor vascular architecture during docetaxel-chemotherapy , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  Wolfhard Semmler,et al.  Comparison of conventional time-intensity curves vs. maximum intensity over time for post-processing of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[16]  Namkug Kim,et al.  Evaluation of Tumor Angiogenesis with a Second-Generation US Contrast Medium in a Rat Breast Tumor Model , 2008, Korean journal of radiology.

[17]  S. L. Bridal,et al.  Noninvasive contrast-enhanced US quantitative assessment of tumor microcirculation in a murine model: effect of discontinuing anti-VEGF therapy. , 2010, Radiology.

[18]  Andrew Needles,et al.  Assessment and Monitoring Tumor Vascularity With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Maximum Intensity Persistence Imaging , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[19]  Nathalie Lassau,et al.  Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[20]  David Cosgrove,et al.  Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  Wolfhard Semmler,et al.  Vessel fractions in tumor xenografts depicted by flow- or contrast-sensitive three-dimensional high-frequency Doppler ultrasound respond differently to antiangiogenic treatment. , 2008, Cancer research.

[22]  Anwar R. Padhani,et al.  Diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring anticancer therapy , 2010, Targeted Oncology.

[23]  Brandon Whitcher,et al.  DCE-MRI biomarkers of tumour heterogeneity predict CRC liver metastasis shrinkage following bevacizumab and FOLFOX-6 , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  P. Vrignaud,et al.  Early Quantitative Evaluation of a Tumor Vasculature Disruptive Agent AVE8062 Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[25]  J. Gore,et al.  Coregistration of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging with a Preliminary Investigation of the Spatial Colocalization of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression and Tumor Perfusion in a Murine Tumor Model , 2009, Molecular imaging.

[26]  Nathalie Lassau,et al.  Methodology for quantifying interactions between perfusion evaluated by DCE-US and hypoxia throughout tumor growth. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  Oriol Casanovas,et al.  Drug resistance by evasion of antiangiogenic targeting of VEGF signaling in late-stage pancreatic islet tumors. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[28]  V. Goh,et al.  Assessment of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell cancer: CT texture as a predictive biomarker. , 2011, Radiology.

[29]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Parameters of Tumor Vascularization in Nude Mice Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contrast‐Enhanced Intermittent Power Doppler Sonography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[30]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  Contrast Ultrasonography: Necessity of Linear Data Processing for the Quantification of Tumor Vascularization , 2010, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[31]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Changes in intratumor heterogeneity in blood perfusion in intradermal human melanoma xenografts during tumor growth assessed by DCE-MRI. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[32]  S. Koscielny,et al.  Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sunitinib: Early Evaluation of Treatment Response Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  Sarah Parisot,et al.  Estimation of intra-operator variability in perfusion parameter measurements using DCE-US. , 2011, World journal of radiology.

[34]  Panagiotis Samaras,et al.  Quantitative Perfusion Analysis of Malignant Liver Tumors: Dynamic Computed Tomography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[35]  P. Opolon,et al.  Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound for the Quantification of Angiogenesis In Vivo , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[36]  H. Augustin,et al.  Heterogeneity of angiogenesis and blood vessel maturation in human tumors: implications for antiangiogenic tumor therapies. , 2000, Cancer research.

[37]  Linda Chami,et al.  Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: early evaluation of response to bevacizumab therapy at dynamic contrast-enhanced US with quantification--preliminary results. , 2011, Radiology.

[38]  S. Kaul,et al.  Assessment of ischemia-induced microvascular remodeling using contrast-enhanced ultrasound vascular anatomic mapping. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[39]  L Barozzi,et al.  The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications , 2011, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[40]  N. Weidner Measuring Intratumoral Microvessel Density , 1998 .

[41]  Tristan Barrett,et al.  MRI of tumor angiogenesis , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[42]  A. Padhani,et al.  Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy. , 2010, Radiology.