Internet-based tailored virtual human health intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: design guidelines from two user studies

To influence user behaviors, Internet-based virtual humans (VH) have been used to deliver health interventions. When developing Internet-based VH health interventions, the developers have to make several design decisions on VH’s appearance, role, language, or medium. The design decisions can affect the outcomes of the Internet-based VH health intervention. To help make design decisions, the current paper presents design guidelines drawn from two studies. The two studies used Internet-based VH health intervention to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The two studies examined the influence of visual design and the influence of the information medium on user intentions to pursue more health information. In the first study, the qualitative analysis of the focus group (n = 73 users in 13 focus groups) transcripts shows that the VH’s visual realism, the VH’s healthcare role, and the presence of a local healthcare provider’s logo influenced the user perceptions of the intervention. The findings from the focus groups were used to iterate the intervention and derive design guidelines. In the second study (n = 1400), the analysis of online surveys from users after the VH-based intervention showed that to positively influence the user intentions to pursue the health topic further, the results recommend the use of an animated VH to deliver health information compared to other mediums of information delivery, such as text. The analysis also shows that very few user comments were related to the VH’s appearance after visual design iterations in the second study. The design guidelines from the two studies can be used by developers when using VH-based interventions to positively influence users’ intention to change behaviors.

[1]  Peter C. Gordon,et al.  Pronouns in Marital Interaction , 2005, Psychological science.

[2]  Wenhong Luo,et al.  Trust-building measures: a review of consumer health portals , 2004, CACM.

[3]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Render me real? , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[4]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[5]  C. Flowers,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening for average‐risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  Stephanie R. Land,et al.  An affective booster moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening , 2012, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[7]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Reporting Mental Health Symptoms: Breaking Down Barriers to Care with Virtual Human Interviewers , 2017, Front. Robot. AI.

[8]  D. Erwin,et al.  Who's Missing? Predictors of Attrition Following Participation in Culturally Targeted Educational Breast and Cervical Cancer Outreach Programs for Latinas , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[9]  Janice L. Krieger,et al.  Creating an mHealth App for Colorectal Cancer Screening: User-Centered Design Approach , 2019, JMIR human factors.

[10]  Catalina L. Toma,et al.  Tell-Tale Words , 2015 .

[11]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Effects of specialization in computers, web sites, and web agents on e-commerce trust , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Philip Tang,et al.  Effectiveness of the extended parallel process model in promoting colorectal cancer screening , 2015, Psycho-oncology.

[13]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples , 2008 .

[14]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Am “I” more important than “we”? Couples’ word use in instant messages , 2008 .

[15]  Peter Franks,et al.  The Effects of Tailoring Knowledge Acquisition on Colorectal Cancer Screening Self-Efficacy , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[16]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  The design of motivational agents and avatars , 2011 .

[17]  A. Graesser,et al.  Pronoun Use Reflects Standings in Social Hierarchies , 2014 .