Exploring Free Will and Consciousness in the Light of Quantum Physics and Neuroscience

This chapter attempts to show that the different observations and arguments presented in this book, while coming from quite different disciplines, are related and complement each other. They support the conclusion that quantum physics and neuroscience are compatible with free will and consciousness. What is more, these seem to be becoming basic irreducible principles (axioms) of today’s science: Consciousness and free will undoubtedly exist, and they must be a fundamental ingredient of any sound explanation of the world. Knowledge, and in particular science, cannot be thought of as separated from the domain of human rights and responsibilities. The ultimate reason for choosing free will may be the profound desire of ensuring personal identity and authorship, and so making it possible to claim personal rights.

[1]  A. Suarez,et al.  Free Will and Nonlocality at Detection as Basic Principles of Quantum Physics , 2013 .

[2]  Giulio Tononi.  On the Irreducibility of Consciousness and Its Relevance to Free Will , 2013 .

[3]  C. Lewis.  Miracles: A Preliminary Study , 1996 .

[4]  R. D. Peralta,et al.  On the Quest for Consciousness in Vegetative State Patients Through Electrical Neuroimaging , 2013 .

[5]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Are There Quantum Effects Coming from Outside Space-time? Nonlocality, free will and , 2010, 1011.3440.

[6]  G. Tononi.  Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto , 2008, The Biological Bulletin.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Hobson.  Sleep is of the brain, by the brain and for the brain , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Theory of Consciousness , 2009 .

[10]  Paul Raymond-Robichaud,et al.  Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent , 2011, 1111.2563.

[11]  A. Acín.  True Quantum Randomness , 2013 .

[12]  F. Keller,et al.  The Role of Inhibitory Control of Reflex Mechanisms in Voluntary Behavior , 2013 .

[13]  Robert O. Doyle.  The Two-Stage Solution to the Problem of Free Will , 2013 .

[14]  M. Heisenberg.  The Origin of Freedom in Animal Behaviour , 2013 .

[15]  A. Kent,et al.  Many worlds? : Everett, quantum theory, and reality , 2010 .

[16]  Javier Bernacer,et al.  On Habit Learning in Neuroscience and Free Will , 2013 .

[17]  A. Kent.  One world versus many: the inadequacy of Everettian accounts of evolution, probability, and scientific confirmation , 2009, 0905.0624.

[18]  Benjamin Libet,et al.  The Timing of Mental Events: Libet's Experimental Findings and Their Implications , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[19]  Simon Kochen,et al.  The Free Will Theorem , 2006 .

[20]  A. Mele.  Free Will and Neuroscience: Revisiting Libet’s Studies , 2013 .

[21]  A. Suarez.  Is this Cell Entity a Human Being? Neural Activity, Spiritual Soul, and the Status of the Inner Cell Mass and Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2011 .

[22]  Simon Kochen,et al.  The Strong Free Will Theorem , 2008, 0807.3286.

[23]  Immanuel Kant,et al.  Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten , 1906 .

[24]  Antoine Suarez,et al.  Is Science Compatible with Free Will , 2013 .

[25]  Martin Heisenberg,et al.  Is free will an illusion? , 2009, Nature.

[26]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics , 1988 .

[27]  Classical demons and quantum angels: On 't Hooft's deterministic quantum mechanics , 2007, 0705.3974.