Towards democratic leadership. Co-principal initiatives

This article introduces international co-principal and shared leadership initiatives that have aimed to develop more democratic organizational structures and practices. It focuses on a case study of a New Zealand primary school co-principalship initiated during the 1990s rise of new right managerialism and describes the impact on this initiative of some inter-group misunderstandings and struggles over power. A discourse analysis shows how these struggles were being played out within the normalising power of state discourse and regulatory practices that marginalized the two ‘special character’ educational strands in the school. The discussions endorse Fraser's (1997) argument that both cultural re-valuation and political/ economic re-distribution are needed for building a democratic school community. The article concludes that this requires a different set of considerations and practices to those promoted within a market managerial approach to school leadership.

[1]  Marian R. Court.  Using narrative and discourse analysis in researching co‐principalships , 2004 .

[2]  M. Day.  Double vision. , 1995, Nursing times.

[3]  Chris Weedon.  Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory , 1987 .

[4]  E. L. West.  The Co-Principalship: Administrative Realism. , 1978 .

[5]  Roland S. Barth.  Improving Schools from Within: Teachers, Parents, and Principals Can Make the Difference , 1990 .

[6]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[7]  James P. Spillane.  Distributed Leadership , 2005 .

[8]  Marian R. Court.  Women Challenging Managerialism: Devolution dilemmas in the establishment of co-principalships in primary schools in Aotearoa/New Zealand , 1998 .

[9]  Rosemary Hennessy.  BOOK REVIEW: Nancy Fraser.JUSTICE INTERRUPTUS: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE ?POSTSOCIALIST? CONDITION. New York: Routledge, 1997. , 1999 .

[10]  Kirsti Klette.  Working Time Blues: On How Norwegian Teachers Experience Restructuring in Education , 1998 .

[11]  B. Davies.  Frogs and Snails and Feminist Tales: Preschool Children and Gender , 1990 .

[12]  C. Mouffe.  Social Postmodernism: Feminism, citizenship, and radical democratic politics , 1995 .

[13]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[14]  G. Allison,et al.  Critical perspectives. , 2022, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  C. Shields,et al.  Complexities and Paradoxes of Community: Toward a more Useful Conceptualization of Community , 1997 .

[16]  M. Foucault.  The Subject and Power , 1982, Critical Inquiry.

[17]  G. Furman,et al.  Postmodernism and Community in Schools: Unraveling the Paradox , 1998 .

[18]  S Teasdale.  Management and administration. , 1992, BMJ.

[19]  Alison Banks.  Two heads better than one? building a cross-phase school of the future , 2002 .

[20]  I. Young.  The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference , 1986 .

[21]  J. Blackmore.  Troubling women : feminism, leadership, and educational change , 1999 .

[22]  A. Brown.  On Foucault : a critical introduction , 2000 .

[23]  Some Insights and Some Cautions , 1982 .

[24]  Thomas J. Sergiovanni.  Building community in schools , 1993 .

[25]  D. Lange.  Tomorrow's schools : the reform of education administration in New Zealand , 1988 .

[26]  A. Sidorkin.  Beyond Discourse: Education, the Self, and Dialogue , 1999 .

[27]  S. Kagan.  Leadership: Rethinking It--Making It Happen. , 1994 .

[28]  Pat Walsh,et al.  Public Management: The New Zealand Model , 1996 .